See Gedicks, Religious Freedom, 142–143.

 See Gedicks, Religious Freedom, 142–143.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Winnifred Fallers Sullivan, The Impossibility of Religious Freedom, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011); Brian Leiter, Why Tolerate Religion?, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012).

 Winnifred Fallers Sullivan, The Impossibility of Religious Freedom, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011); Brian Leiter, Why Tolerate Religion?, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Gedicks, Religious Freedom, 133. The same remark is made by Rex Ahdar (The Empty Idea of Equality Meets the Unbearable Fullness of Religion, in this Journal) in the context of a critical overview of the liberal-democratic approach to freedom of religion (the approach that is upheld by Gedicks): “Religion is no longer special or distinctive but is simply lumped into a category along with other things important to personal identity such as political affiliations, racial or ethnic background, sexuality or marital status… If religion is not special then there is no need to single it out for separate mention or protection.”

 Gedicks, Religious Freedom, 133. The same remark is made by Rex Ahdar (The Empty Idea of Equality Meets the Unbearable Fullness of Religion, in this Journal) in the context of a critical overview of the liberal-democratic approach to freedom of religion (the approach that is upheld by Gedicks): “Religion is no longer special or distinctive but is simply lumped into a category along with other things important to personal identity such as political affiliations, racial or ethnic background, sexuality or marital status… If religion is not special then there is no need to single it out for separate mention or protection.”)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 See S.N. Balagangadhara, “The Heathen in His Blindness…” Asia, the West and the Dynamic of Religion (Leiden: Brill, 1994); Prakash Shah, Legal responses to religious diversity (or to cultural diversity?), in Silvio Ferrari (ed.), Routledge Handbook, 119–132.

 See S.N. Balagangadhara, “The Heathen in His Blindness…” Asia, the West and the Dynamic of Religion (Leiden: Brill, 1994); Prakash Shah, Legal responses to religious diversity (or to cultural diversity?), in Silvio Ferrari (ed.), Routledge Handbook, 119–132.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 See Silvio Ferrari, Models, 204–205.

 See Silvio Ferrari, Models, 204–205.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 See Marco Ventura, “Italy,” in International Encyclopaedia of Laws: Religion (Alphen aan den Rijn, Wolters Kluwer, 2013), 87ff.

 See Marco Ventura, “Italy,” in International Encyclopaedia of Laws: Religion (Alphen aan den Rijn, Wolters Kluwer, 2013), 87ff.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 See John R. Bowen, Why the French Don’t Like Headscarves: Islam, the State, and Public Space (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 2006).

 See John R. Bowen, Why the French Don’t Like Headscarves: Islam, the State, and Public Space (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 2006).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 See Philip Petchey, “Legal Issues for Faith Schools in England and Wales,” in Ecclesiastical Law Journal, v. 10, 2008, 174–190.

 See Philip Petchey, “Legal Issues for Faith Schools in England and Wales,” in Ecclesiastical Law Journal, v. 10, 2008, 174–190.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 See Mohamed Keshavjee, Islam, Sharia and Alternative Dispute Resolution: Mechanisms for Legal Redress in the Muslim Community (London: Tauris, 2013).

 See Mohamed Keshavjee, Islam, Sharia and Alternative Dispute Resolution: Mechanisms for Legal Redress in the Muslim Community (London: Tauris, 2013).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Leiter, Why Tolerate Religion?, 21.

 Leiter, Why Tolerate Religion?, 21.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation