Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Environmental performances of the yellow mealworm defatted meal supply chain: a life cycle assessment study focused on different rearing substrates
in Journal of Insects as Food and FeedSearch for other papers by M. Cordara in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by G. Serra in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by F. Caraceni in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by A. Braca in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by R. Anedda in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by S. Solinas in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by E. Vagnoni in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The increasing demand for sustainable protein sources has positioned edible insect farming as a promising alternative to conventional feed resources. This study explored the implications of Tenebrio molitor meal production, examining how different rearing substrates influence its environmental footprint. Through a site-specific Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), environmental trade-offs were investigated between wheat bran (WB) and dried brewerâs spent grains (BSG) as the main rearing substrates for yellow mealworm production. The dataset was obtained from a pilot-scale trial including 17 and 13 rearing cycles on WB and BSG, respectively, followed by drying and defatting steps. The feed conversion ratio was more efficient using BSG than WB (1.73 vs 2.34Â kg of dry feed per kg of fresh larvae, respectively), although it required higher intake of fresh vegetables. WB-reared larvae showed higher dry matter, nearly double the fat content, and similar protein levels compared to BSG-reared larvae. After processing, WB-based meals contained more protein (55 vs 52%) and yielded more extractable fat. The LCA results showed that substrate choice shaped environmental profiles, creating trade-offs across the nine environmental impact categories considered. Compared to the BSG-based diet, the WB-based diet performed significantly better across all impact categories, except for Freshwater Ecotoxicity and Photochemical Ozone Formation (approx. 70 and 7% higher, respectively). The most notable difference was observed in the Climate Change category, where the WB-based diet showed 44 to 80% lower impacts, depending on the BSG allocation approach. Meal yield emerged as the relevant driver in environmental impacts variability, followed by dry and fresh feeds. The rearing phase was the most impactful in six environmental categories, while defatting phase was the main contributor in two categories. Mealworm protein content resulted in a critical factor in determining the feed environmental efficiency, suggesting that future developments should prioritize both nutritional value and process efficiency.
Kauf
Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):
Institutszugang
Melden Sie sich mit Open Athens, Shibboleth oder Ihren institutionellen Anmeldedaten an.
Persönliche Anmeldung
Melden Sie sich mit Ihrem brill.com-Konto an
-
Alfiko, Y., Xie, D., Astuti, R.T., Wong, J. and Wang, L., 2022. Insects as a feed ingredient for fish culture: status and trends. Aquaculture and Fisheries 7: 166-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaf.2021.10.004
-
Amorim, H.C.S., Ashworth, A.J., Arsi, K., Rojas, M.G., Morales-Ramos, J.A., Donoghue, A. and Robinson, K., 2024. Insect frass composition and potential use as an organic fertilizer in circular economies. Journal of Economic Entomology 117: 1261-1268. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toad234
-
Andreasi Bassi, S., Biganzoli, F., Ferrara, N., Amadei, A., Sala, S. and Ardente, F., 2023. Updated characterisation and normalisation factors for the Environmental Footprint 3.1 method. EUR 31414 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/798894
-
Ashworth, A.J., Amorim, H.C.S., Drescher, G.L., Moore, P.A. Jr, Rojas, M.G., Morales-Ramos, J. and Donoghue, A.M., 2025. Insect frass fertilizer as soil amendment for improved forage and soil health in circular systems. Scientific Reports 15: 24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87075-8
-
Berardy, A., Johnston, C.S., Plukis, A., Vizcaino, M. and Wharton, C., 2019. Integrating protein quality and quantity with environmental impacts in life cycle assessment. Sustainability 11: 2747. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102747
-
Biteau, C., Bry-Chevalier, T., Crummett, D., Ryba, R. and St. Jules, M., 2024. Insect-based livestock feeds are unlikely to become economically viable in the near future. Food and Humanity 3: 100383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foohum.2024.100383
-
Blonk Agri-footprint, 2019. SimaPro software. Available at https://www.blonksustainability.nl
-
Bordiean, A., KrzyzÌaniak, M. and Stolarski, M.J., 2022. Bioconversion potential of agro-industrial by-products by Tenebrio molitor â long-term results. Insects 13: 810. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13090810
-
CaÌmara-Ruiz, M., SaÌnchez-Venegas, A., Blasco-Lavilla, N., HernaÌndez, M.D., SaÌnchez-Liarte, F., FernaÌndez-GutieÌrrez, D. and Lara-GuilleÌn, A.J., 2023. Comparative assessment of insect processing technologies for sustainable insect protein production. Sustainability 15: 13735. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813735
-
Caparros Megido, R., Francis, F., Haubruge, E., Le Gall, P., Tomberlin, J.K., Miranda, C.D., Jordan, H.R., Picard, C.J., Pino, M.J.M., Ramos-Elordy, J., Katz, E., BarragaÌn-Fonseca, K.B., Costa-Neto, E.M., Ponce-Reyes, R., Wijffels, G., Ghosh, S., Jung, C., Han, Y.S., Conti, B., Vilcinskas, A., Tanga, C.M., Kababu, M.O., Beesigamukama, D., Morales Ramos, J.A. and van Huis, A., 2024. A worldwide overview of the status and prospects of edible insect production. Entomologia Generalis 44: 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2023/2279
-
Cliff, N., 1993. Dominance statistics: ordinal analyses to answer ordinal questions. Psychological Bulletin 114: 494-509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.494
-
Corona-Mariscal, A., Sanjuan, N., Güell, C. and Clemente, G., 2024. Assessing the environmental sustainability of insects as a source of functional proteins: a prospective LCA. Future Foods 10: 100457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100457
-
Dancker, P., Glas, K. and Gastl, M., 2025. Potential utilisation methods for brewerâs spent grain: a review. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 60: vvae022. https://doi.org/10.1093/IJFOOD/vvae022
-
Dörper, A., Veldkamp, T. and Dicke, M., 2021. Use of black soldier fly and house fly in feed to promote sustainable poultry production. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 7: 761-780. https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2020.0064
-
Dreyer, M., Hörtenhuber, S., Zollitsch, W., Jäger, H., Schaden, L., Gronauer, A. and Kral, I., 2021. Environmental life cycle assessment of yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) production for human consumption in Austria â a comparison of mealworm and broiler as protein source. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 26: 2232-2247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01980-4
-
Ecoinvent Association, 2023. Ecoinvent database version 3.10. Available at https://ecoinvent.org
-
European Commission, 2021. Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) method, version 3.0. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/PEF_method_en.htm
-
Gasco, L., Caimi, C., Trocino, A., Lussiana, C., Oddon, S.B., Malfatto, V., Anedda, R., Serra, G., Biasato, I., Schiavone, A., Gai, F. and Renna, M., 2022. Digestibility of defatted insect meals for rainbow trout aquafeeds. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 8: 1385-1400. https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2021.0160
-
Gasco, L., Biancarosa, I. and Liland, N.S., 2020. From waste to feed: a review of recent knowledge on insects as producers of protein and fat for animal feeds. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 23: 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2020.03.003
-
Halloran, A., Hanboonsong, Y., Roos, N. and Bruun, S., 2017. Life cycle assessment of cricket farming in north-eastern Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production 156: 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.032
-
Holm, S., 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6: 65-70.
-
Houben, D., Daoulas, G., Faucon, M.P. and Dulaurent, A.M., 2020. Potential use of mealworm frass as a fertilizer: Impact on crop growth and soil properties. Scientific Reports 10: 4659. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61765-xI
-
IPIFF, 2020. Perspectives on the evolution of the European insect sector towards 2030: current EU regulatory status, existing opportunities and prospects for development. Available at https://ipiff.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IPIFF-Brochure-1-1.pdf
-
IPIFF, 2024. Overview investment and funding trends EU insect sector. Available at https://ipiff.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Overview-Investment-and-Funding-Trends-EUinsect-sector-updated-SB-28-06-2024-1.pdf
-
Koutsos, L., McComb, A. and Finke, M., 2019. Insect composition and uses in animal feeding applications: A brief review. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 112: 544-551. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saz033
-
Li, M., Mao, C., Li, X., Jiang, L., Zhang, W., Li, M., Liu, H., Fang, Y., Liu, S., Yang, G. and Ho, X., 2023. Edible insects: a new sustainable nutritional resource worth promoting. Foods 12: 4073. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12224073
-
Lowe, B.H., Bimpizas-Pinis, M., Zerbino, P. and Genovese, A., 2024. Methods to estimate the circular economy rebound effect: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production 443: 141063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141063
-
Maiolo, S., Parisi, G., Biondi, N., Lunelli, F., Tibaldi, E. and Pastres, R., 2020. Fishmeal partial substitution within aquafeed formulations: life cycle assessment of four alternative protein sources. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 25: 1455-1471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01759-z
-
Mancini, S., Sogari, G., Espinosa Diaz, S., Menozzi, D., Paci, G. and Moruzzo, R., 2022. Exploring the future of edible insects in Europe. Foods 11: 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11030455
-
Mann, H.B. and Whitney, D.R., 1947. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 18: 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177730491
-
Melis, R., Braca, A., Mulas, G., Sanna, R., Spada, S., Serra, G., Fadda, M.L., Roggio, T., Uzzau, S. and Anedda, R., 2018. Effect of freezing and drying processes on the molecular traits of edible yellow mealworm. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies 48: 138-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2018.06.003
-
Melis, R., Braca, A., Sanna, R., Spada, S., Mulas, G., Fadda, M.L., Sassu, M.M., Serra, G. and Anedda, R., 2019. Metabolic response of yellow mealworm larvae to two alternative rearing substrates. Metabolomics 15: 113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-019-1578-2
-
Moruzzo, R., Riccioli, F., Espinosa Diaz, S., Secci, C., Poli, G. and Mancini, S., 2021. Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor): Potential and challenges to promote circular economy. Animals 11: 2568. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092568
-
Oonincx, D.G.A.B. and de Boer, I.J.M., 2012. Environmental impact of the production of mealworms as a protein source for humans â a life cycle assessment. PLoS ONE 7: e51145. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051145
-
Oonincx, D.G.A.B., van Broekhoven, S., van Huis, A. and van Loon, J.J.A., 2015. Feed conversion, survival and development and composition of four insect species on diets composed of food by-products. PLoS ONE 10: e0144601. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144601
-
Oonincx, D.G.A.B., van Itterbeeck, J., Heetkamp, M.J.W., van den Brand, H., van Loon, J.J.A. and van Huis, A., 2010. An exploration on greenhouse gas and ammonia production by insect species suitable for animal or human consumption. PLoS ONE 5: e14445. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014445
-
Paris, N., Fortin, A., Hotte, N., Zadeh, A.R., Jain, S. and HeÌnault-Ethier, L., 2024. Developing an environmental assessment framework for an insect farm operating in a circular economy: the case study of a MontreÌal (Canada) mealworm farm. Journal of Cleaner Production 460: 142450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142450
-
Piercy, E., Verstraete, W., Ellis, P.R., Banks, M., Rockström, J., Smith, P., Witard, O.C., Hallett, J., Hogstrand, C., Knott, G., Karwati, A., Rasoarahona, H.F., Leslie, A., He, Y. and Guo, M., 2023. A sustainable waste-to-protein system to maximise waste resource utilisation for developing food- and feed-grade protein solutions. Green Chemistry 25: 808-832. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2gc03095k
-
Poveda, J., JimeÌnez-GoÌmez, A., Saati-SantamarıÌa, Z., Usategui-MartıÌn, R., Rivas, R. and GarcıÌa-Fraile, P., 2019. Mealworm frass as a potential biofertilizer and abiotic stress tolerance-inductor in plants. Applied Soil Ecology 142: 110-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.04.016
-
PReÌ Sustainability, 2025. Software LCA SimaPro Craft Analyst 10.1.0.4. Available at https://simapro.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/UpdateInstructionsSimaPro960ToSimaPro101.pdf
-
Riudavets, J., CastanÌeÌ, C., AgustıÌ, N., del Arco, L., Diaz, I. and Castellari, M., 2020. Development and biomass composition of Ephestia kuehniella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) and Hermetia illucens (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) reared on different byproducts of the agri-food industry. Journal of Insect Science 20: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieaa085
-
Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Saisana, M. and Tarantola, S., 2008. Global sensitivity analysis: the primer. Wiley, Chichester. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470725184
-
Siddiqui, S.A., Osei-Owusu, J., Yunusa, B.M., Rahayu, T., Fernando, I., Shah, M.A. and Centoducati, G., 2023. Prospects of edible insects as sustainable protein for food and feed â a review. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 10: 191-217. https://doi.org/10.1163/23524588-20230042
-
Smetana, S., Ristic, D., Pleissner, D., Tuomisto, H.L., Parniakov, O. and Heinz, V., 2023. Meat substitutes: resource demands and environmental footprints. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 190: 106831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106831
-
Smetana, S., Spykman, R. and Heinz, V., 2021. Environmental aspects of insect mass production. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 7: 553-571. https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2020.0116
-
SO, 2021. ISO 14040-44 International Standard. Environmental management â Life Cycle Assessment â Requirements and guidelines. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
-
Syahrulawal, L., Torske, M.O., Sapkota, R., Næss, G. and Khanal, P., 2023. Improving the nutritional values of yellow mealworm Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) larvae as an animal feed ingredient: a review. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 14: 146. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00945-x
-
TheÌvenot, A., Rivera, J., Wilfart, A., Maillard, F., Hassouna, M., Senga-Kiesse, T., Le FeÌon, S. and Aubin, J., 2018. Mealworm meal for animal feed: environmental assessment and sensitivity analysis to guide future prospects. Journal of Cleaner Production 170: 1260-1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.054
-
van Huis, A. and Oonincx, D.G.A.B., 2017. The environmental sustainability of insects as food and feed: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 37: 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0452-8
-
Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T.E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., van der Walt, S.J., Brett, M., Wilson, J., Millman, K.J., Mayorov, N., Nelson, A.R.J., Jones, E., Kern, R., Larson, E., Carey, C.J., Polat, IÌ., Feng, Y., Moore, E.W., VanderPlas, J., Laxalde, D., Perktold, J., Cimrman, R., Henriksen, I., Quintero, E.A., Harris, C.R., Archibald, A.M., Ribeiro, A.H., Pedregosa, F. and van Mulbregt, P., 2020. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nature Methods 17: 261-272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
-
Vrontaki, M., Adamaki-Sotiraki, C., Rumbos, C.I., Anastasiadis, A. and Athanassiou, C.G., 2024. Bridging the gap: scaling up the sustainable production of the yellow mealworm with agricultural by-products â insights into larval growth and body composition. Agriculture 14: 520. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14040520
Supplementary Materials
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 185 | 185 | 185 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| PDF-Downloads | 14 | 14 | 14 |
Environmental performances of the yellow mealworm defatted meal supply chain: a life cycle assessment study focused on different rearing substrates
in Journal of Insects as Food and FeedSearch for other papers by M. Cordara in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G. Serra in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F. Caraceni in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A. Braca in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R. Anedda in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S. Solinas in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E. Vagnoni in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The increasing demand for sustainable protein sources has positioned edible insect farming as a promising alternative to conventional feed resources. This study explored the implications of Tenebrio molitor meal production, examining how different rearing substrates influence its environmental footprint. Through a site-specific Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), environmental trade-offs were investigated between wheat bran (WB) and dried brewerâs spent grains (BSG) as the main rearing substrates for yellow mealworm production. The dataset was obtained from a pilot-scale trial including 17 and 13 rearing cycles on WB and BSG, respectively, followed by drying and defatting steps. The feed conversion ratio was more efficient using BSG than WB (1.73 vs 2.34Â kg of dry feed per kg of fresh larvae, respectively), although it required higher intake of fresh vegetables. WB-reared larvae showed higher dry matter, nearly double the fat content, and similar protein levels compared to BSG-reared larvae. After processing, WB-based meals contained more protein (55 vs 52%) and yielded more extractable fat. The LCA results showed that substrate choice shaped environmental profiles, creating trade-offs across the nine environmental impact categories considered. Compared to the BSG-based diet, the WB-based diet performed significantly better across all impact categories, except for Freshwater Ecotoxicity and Photochemical Ozone Formation (approx. 70 and 7% higher, respectively). The most notable difference was observed in the Climate Change category, where the WB-based diet showed 44 to 80% lower impacts, depending on the BSG allocation approach. Meal yield emerged as the relevant driver in environmental impacts variability, followed by dry and fresh feeds. The rearing phase was the most impactful in six environmental categories, while defatting phase was the main contributor in two categories. Mealworm protein content resulted in a critical factor in determining the feed environmental efficiency, suggesting that future developments should prioritize both nutritional value and process efficiency.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 185 | 185 | 185 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| PDF-Downloads | 14 | 14 | 14 |
