Consumer perception of insects in non-food products
äºJournal of Insects as Food and FeedSearch for other papers by M. Lenaerts in
Current site
Google Scholar
Biomolecular & Analytical Mass Spectrometry, Department of Chemistry, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium.
Search for other papers by F. Meersman in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by G.R. Verheyen in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by S. Van Miert in
Current site
Google Scholar
In order to evolve towards a green and biobased economy, the use of insects can play a vital role for the management of organic waste and its conversion into biomass. The larvae of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens), a high fat containing insect, appear to hold interesting opportunities for companies active in oleo chemistry as well as companies that process the fats and derived products (such as surfactants) into end products, such as detergents, household cleaning products, personal care products and cosmetics. When introducing new green products like these to consumers, an understanding of the perception of insect-based products is necessary to choose appropriate marketing strategies to overcome innovation resistance. Due to the lack of research on this subject, the purpose of this study is to develop an initial understanding of the consumer perception and to explore the factors driving and hindering the adoption of insect-based products. The majority of studies on the subject of insects, is focused on applications in food. Our study aims to fill an existing gap, by focussing on non-food products. A mixed method design was used and consists of a literature study, and a qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis. The results indicate that both novelty seekers and risk avoiders are willing to try insect-based products, but barriers vary per product category. This study is part of the INFACT project, in which green surfactants, based on black soldier fly fats are synthesised and implemented in technical applications.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Beers, P., Lodder, M., Spork, C. and Rotmans, J., 2018. Rapport roadmap next economy Greenport West-Holland 2050. Dutch Research Institute for Transitions, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
'Rapport roadmap next economy Greenport West-Holland 2050', ().
-
Cohen, S. and Markowitz, P., 2002. Renewing market segmentation: some new tools to correct old problems. European Society for Opinion and Marketing Research (ESOMAR) In: Proceedings of the Consumer Insight Congress, September, 2002, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 595-612.
'Renewing market segmentation: some new tools to correct old problems ', () 595 -612.
-
Doey, L. and Kurta, J., 2011. Correspondence analysis applied to psychological research. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, pp. 5-14.https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.07.1.p005
-
Flanders Food, 2016. Flanders food. Available at:https://www.flandersfood.com/documenten/2017/10/20/dag-1-insecten-thomas-more-marktonderzoek
-
GlobalWebIndex, 2018. The rise of green consumerism: what brands need to know? Available at:https://blog.globalwebindex.com/chart-of-the-week/green-consumerism/
-
Laureati, M., Proserpio, C., Jucker, C. and Savoldelli, S., 2016. New sustainable protein sources: consumersâ willingness to adopt insects as feed and food. Italian Journal of Food Science 28: 652-668.
'New sustainable protein sources: consumersâ willingness to adopt insects as feed and food ' () 28 Italian Journal of Food Science : 652 -668.
-
Louviere, J., 1993. The best-worst or maximum difference measurement model: applications to behavioral research in marketing. In: Proceedings of the American Marketing Associationâs 1993 Behavioral Research Conference, Phoenix, AZ, USA
'The best-worst or maximum difference measurement model: applications to behavioral research in marketing', ().
-
Martins, Y. and Pliner, P., 2006. âUgh! Thatâs disgusting!â: Identification of the characteristics of foods underlying rejections based on disgust. Appetite 46: 75-85.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2005.09.001
-
Megido, R., Sablon, L., Geuens, M., Brostaux, Y., Alabi, T., Blecker, C., Drugmand, D., Haubruge, E. and Francis, F., 2014. Edible insects acceptance by Belgian consumers: promising attitude for entomophagy development. Journal of Sensory Studies 29: 14-20.https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12077
-
Qualtrics (n.d.). Survey platform. Available at:https://www.qualtrics.com/research-core/survey-software/
-
Schösler, H., De Boer, J. and Boersema, J., 2012. Can we cut out the meat of the dish? Constructing consumer-oriented pathways towards meat substitution. Appetite 58: 39-47.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.09.009
-
Sun-Waterhouse, D., Waterhouse, G., You, L., Zhang, J., Liu, Y., Ma, L., Gao, J. and Dong, Y., 2016. Transforming insect biomass into consumer wellness foods: a review. Food Research International 89: 129-151.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2016.10.001
-
Tan, H., Fischer, A., Tinchan, P., Stieger, M., Steenbekkers, L. and Van Trijp, H., 2015. Insects as food: exploring cultural exposure and individual experience as determinants of acceptance. Food Quality and Preference 42: 78-89.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.01.013
-
Verbeke, W., 2015. Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society. Food Quality and Preference 39: 147-155.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.008
-
Verheyen, G., Ooms, T., Vogels, L., Vreysen, S., Bovy, A. and Van Miert, S., 2018. Insects as an alternative source for the production of fats for cosmetics. Journal of Cosmetic Science 69: 187-202.https://europepmc.org/abstract/med/30052193
Supplementary Materials
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 650 | 197 | 17 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 42 | 5 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 65 | 13 | 0 |
Consumer perception of insects in non-food products
äºJournal of Insects as Food and FeedSearch for other papers by M. Lenaerts in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Biomolecular & Analytical Mass Spectrometry, Department of Chemistry, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium.
Search for other papers by F. Meersman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G.R. Verheyen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S. Van Miert in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
In order to evolve towards a green and biobased economy, the use of insects can play a vital role for the management of organic waste and its conversion into biomass. The larvae of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens), a high fat containing insect, appear to hold interesting opportunities for companies active in oleo chemistry as well as companies that process the fats and derived products (such as surfactants) into end products, such as detergents, household cleaning products, personal care products and cosmetics. When introducing new green products like these to consumers, an understanding of the perception of insect-based products is necessary to choose appropriate marketing strategies to overcome innovation resistance. Due to the lack of research on this subject, the purpose of this study is to develop an initial understanding of the consumer perception and to explore the factors driving and hindering the adoption of insect-based products. The majority of studies on the subject of insects, is focused on applications in food. Our study aims to fill an existing gap, by focussing on non-food products. A mixed method design was used and consists of a literature study, and a qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis. The results indicate that both novelty seekers and risk avoiders are willing to try insect-based products, but barriers vary per product category. This study is part of the INFACT project, in which green surfactants, based on black soldier fly fats are synthesised and implemented in technical applications.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 650 | 197 | 17 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 42 | 5 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 65 | 13 | 0 |
