Religious Pluralism and Religious Education
äºJournal of Empirical TheologySearch for other papers by Hans-Georg Ziebertz in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
When thinking of alternatives for denominational religious teaching, it always includes answering the question about the relating discipline. In this contribution, the question is which theological horizon justifies the established type of denominational teaching as practised in Germany, and which theological justifications for alternative concepts of teaching are involved. In addition, it is also necessary to investigate the actual importance of distinctions between types of teaching and explanatory contexts in practice, that is, in the minds of teachers.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 491 | 33 | 7 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 165 | 3 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 67 | 8 | 0 |
Religious Pluralism and Religious Education
äºJournal of Empirical TheologySearch for other papers by Hans-Georg Ziebertz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
When thinking of alternatives for denominational religious teaching, it always includes answering the question about the relating discipline. In this contribution, the question is which theological horizon justifies the established type of denominational teaching as practised in Germany, and which theological justifications for alternative concepts of teaching are involved. In addition, it is also necessary to investigate the actual importance of distinctions between types of teaching and explanatory contexts in practice, that is, in the minds of teachers.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 491 | 33 | 7 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 165 | 3 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 67 | 8 | 0 |
