In this article the author first prov ides the lexicology of temptation the word and the concept have been semantically integrated into theology, but never indexed in scientific psychology. Next he provides a clinical description of three experiences of temptation without any moral or religious implications. After this he considers robbery, rape, and violence as an expressive projection of social prejudices or as repression in an ascetic ideal. Next he describes the current debate in Christian religion: are there temptations without a Tempter? His conclusion deals with the methodological presuppositions for the psychological study of experiences of temptation.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 264 | 48 | 4 |
| Full Text Views | 31 | 1 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 23 | 3 | 0 |
In this article the author first prov ides the lexicology of temptation the word and the concept have been semantically integrated into theology, but never indexed in scientific psychology. Next he provides a clinical description of three experiences of temptation without any moral or religious implications. After this he considers robbery, rape, and violence as an expressive projection of social prejudices or as repression in an ascetic ideal. Next he describes the current debate in Christian religion: are there temptations without a Tempter? His conclusion deals with the methodological presuppositions for the psychological study of experiences of temptation.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 264 | 48 | 4 |
| Full Text Views | 31 | 1 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 23 | 3 | 0 |