Are there Public Effects of Religious Education?
Assessing the Contribution of Religious Education to the Acceptance of Cultural Diversity, Reticence toward Populism, and Generalized Social Trust among Young People in Germany
In: Journal of Empirical TheologySearch for other papers by Felix Roleder in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This quantitative study examines the effects of religious education, in conjunction with other religious and non-religious factors, on the civic attitudes of Christians under the age of 30 in Germany. The multivariate analyses are based on a recent population representative sample (6th Church Membership Survey). The results provide modest evidence of a limited direct and indirect contribution of religious education to civic attitudes. In addition to a direct reduction in populist attitudes, school religious education is somewhat associated with acceptance of cultural diversity and immigration, thereby also indirectly decreasing the appeal of populism. However, the ambivalent role of young Christians’ religiosity is evident in relation to traditionalism and religious exclusivism, which are associated with a preference for cultural homogeneity and, consequently, an affinity with populism. These findings contribute to the understanding of the current crisis of the acceptance of democracy and underline the public dimension of religious education.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Abu-Raiya, H., & Pargament, K. (2015). “Religious Coping among Diverse Religions: Commonalities and Divergences” in Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037652.
-
Akkerman, A., Mudde, C., & Zaslove, A. (2014). “How Populist are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters” in Comparative Political Studies, 47(9), 1324–1353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013512600.
-
Albert, M., Quenzel, G., & Moll, F. (2024). Jugend 2024–19. Shell Jugendstudie: Pragmatisch zwischen Verdrossenheit und gelebter Vielfalt. Weinheim: Belz.
-
Benoit, V. (2021). “Opposing Immigrants in Europe: The Interplay between Religiosity, Values, and Threat” in Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 60(3), 555–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12726.
-
Bruch, S., & Soss, J. (2018). “Schooling as a Formative Political Experience: Authority Relations and the Education of Citizens” in Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717002195.
-
Charles, S., van Mulukom, V., Brown, J., Watts, F., Dunbar, R., & Farias, M. (2021). “United on Sunday: The Effects of Secular Rituals on Social Bonding and Affect” in PloS One, 16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242546.
-
Foa, R. S., Klassen, A., Wenger, D., Rand, A., & Slade, M. (2020). Youth and Satisfaction with Democracy: Reversing the Democratic Disconnect? Cambridge: Centre for the Future of Democracy.
-
Francis, L., Penny, G., & Barnes, P. (2017). “Does RE Work and Contribute to the Common Good in England?” in E. Arweck (Ed.), Young People’s Attitudes to Religious Diversity (pp. 153–170). Oxon: Routledge.
-
Ghitza, Y., Gelman, A., & Auerbach, J. (2023). “The Great Society, Reagan’s Revolution, and Generations of Presidential Voting” in American Journal of Political Science, 67(3), 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12713.
-
Grümme, B. (2009). Religionsunterricht und Politik: Bestandsaufnahme – Grundsatzüberlegungen – Perspektiven für eine politische Dimension des Religionsunterrichts. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
-
Hawkins, K., Rovira Kaltwasser, C., & Andreadis, I. (2020). “The Activation of Populist Attitudes” in Government and Opposition, 55(2), 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2018.23.
-
Hock, J. (2023). “Der Religionsunterricht im Spiegel der sechsten Kirchenmitgliedschaftsuntersuchung: Die Daten im Überblick” in Zeitschrift für Pädagogik und Theologie, 75(4), 466–475. https://doi.org/10.1515/zpt-2023-2033.
-
KAMP, & SI EKD. (2024). Wie hältst du’s mit der Kirche? Zur Relevanz von Religion und Kirche in der pluralen Gesellschaft. Analysen zur 6. Kirchenmitgliedschaftsuntersuchung. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt.
-
Könemann, J. (2018). “Plädoyer für eine politische Religionspädagogik” in Religionspädagogische Beiträge, 78, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.15496/publikation-76996.
-
Maier, M., Welzenbach-Vogel, I., Christner, C., Tillman, E., Zinkernagel, A., & Schmitt, M. (2023). “Implicit and Explicit Populist and Anti-Immigrant Attitudes and their Explanatory Power for Populist Radical-right Party Support” in Acta Politica, 58(3), 591–613. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-022-00255-6
-
Mitchell, J. (2021). “Social Trust and Anti-Immigrant Attitudes in Europe: A Longitudinal Multi-Level Analysis” in Frontiers in Sociology, 6, 604884. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.604884.
-
Nai, A. (2021). “Fear and Loathing in Populist Campaigns? Comparing the Communication Style of Populists and Non-populists in Elections Worldwide” in Journal of Political Marketing, 20(2), 219–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2018.1491439.
-
Noack, P., & Eckstein, K. (2023). “Populism in Youth: Do Experiences in School Matter?” in Child Development Perspectives, 17(2), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12481.
-
Österman, M. (2021). “Can We Trust Education for Fostering Trust? Quasi-experimental Evidence on the Effect of Education and Tracking on Social Trust” in Social Indicators Research, 154(1), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02529-y.
-
Österman, M., & Robinson, D. (2023). “Educating Democrats or Autocrats? The Regime- Conditional Effect of Education on Support for Democracy” in Political Studies, 71(4), 1298–1320. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211067385.
-
Paxton, P., & Ressler, R. (2018). “Trust and Participation in Associations” in E. Uslaner (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust (pp. 149–174). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Petri, A. (2018). Emotionssensibler Politikunterricht: Konsequenzen aus der Emotionsforschung für Theorie und Praxis politischer Bildung. Frankfurt am Main: Wochenschau Verlag.
-
Pöhlmann, M. (2022). Rechte Esoterik: Wenn sich alternatives Denken und Extremismus gefährlich vermischen. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.
-
Rekker, R., Keijsers, L., Branje, S., & Meeus, W. (2015). “Political Attitudes in Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood: Developmental Changes in Mean Level, Polarization, Rank-order stability, and Correlates” in Journal of Adolescence, 41, 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.03.011.
-
Riegel, U. (2018). Wie Religion in Zukunft unterrichten? Zum Konfessionsbezug des Religionsunterrichts von (über-)morgen. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
-
Riegel, U. (2024). Wirksamkeitsforschung, religionsdidaktische. WiReLex. https://doi.org/10.23768/wirelex.400002.
-
Rinnooy Kan, W., Munniksma, A., & Volman, M. (2023). “Diverse Sources of Trust: Sense of School Membership, Generalized Social Trust, and the Role of a Diverse School Population” in Journal of Applied Youth Studies, 6(4), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43151-023-00105-y.
-
Roleder, F. (2020). Die relationale Gestalt von Kirche: Der Beitrag der Netzwerkforschung zur Kirchentheorie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
-
Roleder, F. (2025). “Religious Coping with Contingency as a Resource for Democracy? Exploring Religious Resilience as a Mediator between Religiosity, Political Trust, and Reticence toward Populism” in Zeitschrift für Religion, Gesellschaft und Politik. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41682-024-00178-3.
-
Schlag, T. (2010). Horizonte demokratischer Bildung: Evangelische Religionspädagogik in politischer Perspektive. Freiburg: Herder.
-
Schnetzer, S., Hampel, K., & Hurrelmann, K. (2024). Trendstudie Jugend in Deutschland: Verantwortung für die Zukunft? Ja, aber. Düsseldorf: Publikationsservice HHU. http://doi.org/10.17879/58918451646.
-
Schweitzer, F. (2020). “Wirksamkeitsforschung in der Religionsdidaktik: Ziele, Forschungsfelder und die Frage nach religionsdidaktischen Forschungsformaten” in Theo-Web. Zeitschrift für Religionspädagogik, 19(1), 85–98.
-
Simojoki, H., Hees, M., & Ilg, W. (2024). Konfi-Arbeit in und nach der Corona-Pandemie: Empirische Befunde und Impulse für die Qualitätsentwicklung aus der dritten bundesweiten Studie. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus.
-
Steinmann, J.‑P. (2023). “Hochreligiös und migrantenfreundlich? Der nichtlineare Zusammenhang zwischen Religiosität und Fremdenfeindlichkeit in Deutschland” in Zeitschrift für Religion, Gesellschaft und Politik, 7(1), 419–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41682-023-00157-0.
-
Stephan, W., & Renfro, L. (2003). “The Role of Threat in Intergroup Relations” in D. Mackie & E. Smith (Eds.), From Prejudice to Intergroup Relations: Differentiated Reactions to Social Groups (pp. 191–207). New York: Psychology Press.
-
Traunmüller, R. (2018). “Religion und Sozialkapital” in D. Pollack, V. Krech, O. Müller, & M. Hero (Eds.), Handbuch Religionssoziologie (pp. 911–933). Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18924-6_37.
-
Unser, A. (2021). “Interreligiöses Lernen” in U. Kropač & U. Riegel (Eds.), Handbuch Religionsdidaktik (pp. 280–291). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
-
Uslaner, E. (2018). “The Study of Trust” in E. Uslaner (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust (pp. 3–14). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Vieluf, S., Praetorius, A.‑K., Rakoczy, K., Kleinknecht, M., & Pietsch, M. (2020). “Angebots-Nutzungs-Modelle der Wirkweise des Unterrichts: Ein kritischer Vergleich verschiedener Modellvarianten” in A.-K. Praetorius, J. Grünkorn, & E. Klieme (Eds.), Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, Beiheft 66. Empirische Forschung zu Unterrichtsqualität: Theoretische Grundfragen und quantitative Modellierungen (pp. 63–80). Weinheim: Belz. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:25864.
-
Zick, A., & Sandal-Önal, E. (2023). “Krisenungewissheit und ihr Zusammenhang zu anti- und prodemokratischen Überzeugungen” in A. Zick, B. Küpper, & N. Mokros (Eds.), Die distanzierte Mitte: Rechtsextreme und demokratiegefährdende Einstellungen in Deutschland 2022/23 (pp. 219–242). Bonn: J.H.W. Dietz.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 508 | 233 | 16 |
| Full Text Views | 33 | 15 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 77 | 35 | 0 |
Are there Public Effects of Religious Education?
Assessing the Contribution of Religious Education to the Acceptance of Cultural Diversity, Reticence toward Populism, and Generalized Social Trust among Young People in Germany
In: Journal of Empirical TheologySearch for other papers by Felix Roleder in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This quantitative study examines the effects of religious education, in conjunction with other religious and non-religious factors, on the civic attitudes of Christians under the age of 30 in Germany. The multivariate analyses are based on a recent population representative sample (6th Church Membership Survey). The results provide modest evidence of a limited direct and indirect contribution of religious education to civic attitudes. In addition to a direct reduction in populist attitudes, school religious education is somewhat associated with acceptance of cultural diversity and immigration, thereby also indirectly decreasing the appeal of populism. However, the ambivalent role of young Christians’ religiosity is evident in relation to traditionalism and religious exclusivism, which are associated with a preference for cultural homogeneity and, consequently, an affinity with populism. These findings contribute to the understanding of the current crisis of the acceptance of democracy and underline the public dimension of religious education.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 508 | 233 | 16 |
| Full Text Views | 33 | 15 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 77 | 35 | 0 |
