Save

Tragedy as Contingency Acknowledgement: Towards a Practical Religious-Scientific Theory

In: Journal of Empirical Theology
Authors:
Egbert van Dalen Radboud University Nijmegen

Search for other papers by Egbert van Dalen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Michael Scherer-Rath Radboud University Nijmegen

Search for other papers by Michael Scherer-Rath in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hanneke van Laarhoven Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam

Search for other papers by Hanneke van Laarhoven in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gerard Wiegers University of Amsterdam

Search for other papers by Gerard Wiegers in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Chris Hermans Radboud University Nijmegen

Search for other papers by Chris Hermans in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€36.93

Abstract

According to philosopher of religion Kurt Wuchterl, contingency acknowledgement (German: Kontingenzanerkennung) means that rational thinking is inadequate for explaining contingency experiences. The authors argue that, in the tragic narrative of a contingency experience, subjects face limitations in three dimensions: in the individual, social and transcending dimensions. The individual dimension is expressed in powerful, visual metaphors for the confrontation with forces that do not take the human dimension into account in any way, even coercing the subjects to relinquish their existence. The social dimension concerns the tragic subject’s feeling of being avoided and excluded by some individuals in their environment. The transcending dimension emerges in the complaint “Why me?”, which religious persons address to a religious power, using moral arguments. Empirical research suggests that the acknowledgement of one’s own limitations resulting from a contingency experience can be seen as a sign of strength rather than weakness, for, by doing so, one shows the courage to let go of past interpretative frameworks and be vulnerable. This creates the possibility of an opening in the interpretation crisis, which can lead to an unexpected, new perspective.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 675 82 2
Full Text Views 89 4 0
PDF Views & Downloads 118 4 0