Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Narrative integration of experiences of contingency describes the ways (modes) in which people assimilate the uncontrollability—or contingency—of life, while accepting, acknowledging and tolerating the existential fears accompanying these experiences, thus keeping contingency open. Contingency is defined as events being ‘possible (or not impossible) and also not necessary at the same time’. Experiences of contingency, caused by the interplay between life events, one’s worldview and ultimate life goals, disrupt one’s life story, challenging one’s basic needs for understanding, coherence and meaning.
The different modes of narrative integration are studied in six highly sensitive Dutch children, aged between 6 and 12 years old. A practice-based model by Kruizinga et al. (2017) is compared to a theoretical construct of religious philosophical contingency constructed by Wuchterl (2011; 2019). Practical and theoretical differences are discussed. This study confirms the findings by Kruizinga et al. (2017).
Four modes of dealing with contingency are identified: Denial, Acknowledging, Accepting and Receiving. In mode four, Receiving, people transcend themselves (self-transcendence). Contrary to Wuchterl’s theory, vertical transcendence is not a prerequisite for narrative integration of contingency, or for keeping contingency open. We conclude that the model of narrative integration of experiences of contingency by Kruizinga et al. is a valid tool for further research. Possible applications in the field of spiritual care are discussed.
Kauf
Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):
Institutszugang
Melden Sie sich mit Open Athens, Shibboleth oder Ihren institutionellen Anmeldedaten an.
Persönliche Anmeldung
Melden Sie sich mit Ihrem brill.com-Konto an
Aron, E. (2003). The Highly Sensitive Child—Helping Children Thrive in a World that Overwhelms Them. New York, Harper Collins Publishers.
Boeije, H. (2014). Analyseren in kwalitatief onderzoek. Denken en doen. Den Haag, Uitgeverij Boom Lemma Uitgevers.
Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods (3rd ed.). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Friese, S. (2012). Qualitative Data Analysis with Atlas Ti. London, Sage.
Hart, T. (2003). The Secret Spiritual World of Children. Novato, New World Library.
Hartog, I., Scherer-Rath, M., Kruizinga, R., Netjes, J., Henriques, J., Nieuwkerk, P., Sprangers, M. and Van Laarhoven, H. (2017). Narrative meaning making and integration: Toward a better understanding of the way falling ill influences quality of life. Journal of Health Psychology, 1-17.
Hay, D., & Nye, R. (2006). The Spirit of the Child. Revised edition. London, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Jansen, H. (2010). The logic of qualitative survey research and its position in the field of social research methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11, 1-19. DOI: 0114-fqs1002110.
Kruizinga, R., Hartog, I.D., Scherer-Rath, M., Schilderman, H. and Van Laarhoven, H. (2017). Modes of relating to contingency: an exploration of experiences in advanced cancer patients. Palliative & Supportive Care, 15, 444-453.
Kruizinga, R., Najmeh, N., Scherer-Rath, M., Schilderman, H., Bires, J., Puchalski, C. and Van Laarhoven, H. (2018). Relating to the experience of contingency in advanced cancer patients: an interview study in American patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 11, 913-921.
Mulvaney, M. (2011). Narrative processes around childhood. Early Child Development and Care, 181, 1153-1161.
Nye, R. and Hay, D. (1996). Identifying children’s spirituality: how do you start without a starting point? British Journal of Religious Education, 18, 144-154.
Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and Narrative. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1986). Zufall und Vernunft in der Geschichte. Tübingen, Konkursbuch-Verlag.
Scherer-Rath, M. (2013). Ervaring van contingentie en spirituele zorg. Psyche en Geloof, 24(3), 184-195.
Scherer-Rath, M., Van den Brand, J., Van Straten, C., Modderkolk, L., Terlouw, C. and Hoencamp, E. (2012). Experience of contingency and congruent interpretation of life events in clinical psychiatric settings: a qualitative pilot study. Journal of Empirical Theology, 25, 127-152. DOI: 10.1163/15709256-12341242.
Schnell, T. (2003). A framework for the study of implicit religion: the psychological theory of implicit religiosity. Implicit Religion, 6, 2-3.
Straub, J. (2005). Telling stories, making history: toward a narrative psychology of the historical construction of meaning. In: Straub, J. (ed.) Narration, Identity, and Historical Consciousness, pp. 44-98. New York, Berghahn Books,.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J.M. (1997). Grounded Theory in Practice. London, Sage Publications.
Van Dalen, E., Scherer-Rath, M., Hermans, C., et al. (2012). Breaking the bad news: experiences of contingency in advanced cancer patients. In: Paper presented at the ASCO annual meeting, Chicago, IL, 1-5 June.
Van Dalen, E. (2019). Interpretatiecrisis bij ongeneselijke kankerpatiënten. Een religiewetenschappelijk onderzoek naar verklaringen, het onverwachte, tragiek en de gewaarwording van het andere. Münster, LIT Verlag.
Van den Brand, J. (2016). Levensverhaal en pedagogische handelingsoriëntatie in de laatmoderne tijd. Münster, LIT Verlag.
Van den Brand, J., Hermans, C., Scherer-Rath, M. and Verschuren, P. (2013). An instrument for reconstructing interpretation in life stories. In: R. Ganzevoort, M. de Haardt, M. Scherer-Rath (eds.). Religious Stories We Live By: Narrative Approaches in Theology and Religious Studies, pp. 163-180. Leiden, Brill.
Vanaelst, B., Huybrechts, I., de Bourdeaudhuij, I., Bammann, K., Hadjigeorgiou, C., Eiben, G., Konstabel, K., Michels, N., Molnar, D., Moreno, L., Pigeot, I., Reisch, L., Siani, A., Vyncke, K. and de Henauw, S. (2012). Prevalence of negative life events and chronic adversities in European pre- and primary-school children: results from the IDEFICS study. Archives of Public Health, 70(26), 1-11.
Verschuren, P.J.M., and J. Doorewaard (2006). Het ontwerpen van een onderzoek. ’s-Gravenhage, Boom Lemma.
Vos, J. (2018). Meaning in Life. An Evidence-Based Handbook for Practitioners. London, Palgrave.
Weiher, E. (2014). Das Geheimnis des Lebens berühren. Spiritualität bei Krankheit, Sterben, Tod. Eine Grammatik für Helfende. Stuttgart, W. Kohlhammer.
Wuchterl, K. (2011). Kontingenz Oder Das Andere Der Vernunft: Zum Verhältnis Von Philosophie, Naturwissenschaft Und Religion. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner Verlag.
Wuchterl, K. (2019). Religious-philosophical Contingency and Empirical Theology. Journal of Empirical Theology, 32(2), 169-187.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 771 | 57 | 1 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 96 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF-Downloads | 146 | 7 | 0 |
Narrative integration of experiences of contingency describes the ways (modes) in which people assimilate the uncontrollability—or contingency—of life, while accepting, acknowledging and tolerating the existential fears accompanying these experiences, thus keeping contingency open. Contingency is defined as events being ‘possible (or not impossible) and also not necessary at the same time’. Experiences of contingency, caused by the interplay between life events, one’s worldview and ultimate life goals, disrupt one’s life story, challenging one’s basic needs for understanding, coherence and meaning.
The different modes of narrative integration are studied in six highly sensitive Dutch children, aged between 6 and 12 years old. A practice-based model by Kruizinga et al. (2017) is compared to a theoretical construct of religious philosophical contingency constructed by Wuchterl (2011; 2019). Practical and theoretical differences are discussed. This study confirms the findings by Kruizinga et al. (2017).
Four modes of dealing with contingency are identified: Denial, Acknowledging, Accepting and Receiving. In mode four, Receiving, people transcend themselves (self-transcendence). Contrary to Wuchterl’s theory, vertical transcendence is not a prerequisite for narrative integration of contingency, or for keeping contingency open. We conclude that the model of narrative integration of experiences of contingency by Kruizinga et al. is a valid tool for further research. Possible applications in the field of spiritual care are discussed.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 771 | 57 | 1 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 96 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF-Downloads | 146 | 7 | 0 |