Valuing Care Protects Religiosity from the Antisocial Consequences of Impersonal Deontology
In: Journal of Empirical TheologySearch for other papers by Csilla Deak in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Vassilis Saroglou in
Current site
Google Scholar
Morality typically includes prosociality but often also extends to impersonal deontology. Religion, theoretically and empirically, is concerned with both moral domains. What happens when the two domains are in conflict? Do religious people prefer impersonal deontology at the detriment of prosociality? Or do their prosocial inclinations allow them to transgress conflicting moral principles, for instance through white lies? Participants (177 Belgian adults) made a choice in several hypothetical moral dilemmas and were afterwards evaluated on Haidt’s moral foundations (care, fairness, authority, loyalty, and purity) and religiosity. When the conflict implied minor consequences for the target, religiosity predicted impersonal deontology at the detriment of prosociality, because of a high endorsement of purity. However, when the consequences were severe, religiosity was unrelated to impersonal deontology due to a suppressor effect of care. The findings indicate that prosocial dispositions shape religiosity into a ‘compassionate moral rigorism’, thus protecting it from excessive moralism.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Antonenko Young O., Willer R. & Keltner D. ‘Thou shalt not kill’: Religious fundamentalism, conservatism, and rule-based moral processing Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 2013 5 110 115
-
Arzheimer K. & Carter E. Christian religiosity and voting for West European radical right parties West European Politics 2009 32 985 1011
-
Blogowska J. & Saroglou V. Fundamentalism and authoritarianism: Global constructs, global relations? 2011 August Paper presented at the International Association for the Psychology of Religion Conference Bari, Italy
-
Blogowska J. & Saroglou V. For better or worse: Fundamentalists’ attitudes towards outgroups as a function of exposure to authoritative religious texts International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 2013 23 103 125
-
Conway P. & Gawronski B. Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2013 104 216 235
-
Deak C. & Saroglou V. Emotional intelligence and moral foundations as predicting deontological, non-prosocial moral choices 2012 May Poster presented at the 4th European Conference on Emotion of the Consortium of European Research on Emotion Canterbury, Great Britain
-
Deak C. & Saroglou V. Opposing abortion, gay adoption, euthanasia, and suicide: Compassionate openness or self-centered moral rigorism? Archive for the Psychology of Religion 2015 37 267 294
-
Deak C. & Saroglou V. Terminating a child’s life? Religious, moral, cognitive, and emotional factors underlying non-acceptance of child euthanasia Psychologica Belgica (in press)
-
Graham J. & Haidt J. Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities Personality and Social Psychology Review 2010 14 140 150
-
Graham J., Nosek B. A., Haidt J., Iyer R., Koleva S. P. & Ditto P. H. Mapping the moral domain Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2011 101 366 385
-
Greene J. D., Sommerville R. B., Nystrom L. E., Darley J. M. & Cohen J. D. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment Science 2001 293 2105 2108
-
Haidt J. & Graham J. When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize Social Justice Research 2007 20 98 116
-
Hayes A. F. & Preacher K. J. Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 2014 67 451 470
-
Kohlberg L. Essays on moral development. Vol. 1: The philosophy of moral development 1981 San Francisco, CA Harper & Row
-
Kugler M., Jost J. T. & Noorbaloochi S. Another look at moral foundations theory: Do authoritarianism and social dominance orientation explain liberal-conservative differences in ‘moral’ intuitions? Social Justice Research 2014 27 413 431
-
Malka A. Saroglou V. Religion and domestic political attitudes around the world Religion, personality, and social behavior 2014 New York, NY Psychology Press 230 254
-
Malka A. & Soto C. J. The conflicting influences of religiosity on attitude toward torture Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2011 37 1091 1103
-
Malka A., Lelkes Y., Srivastava S., Cohen A. B. & Miller D. T. The association of religiosity and political conservatism: The role of political engagement Political Psychology 2012 33 275 299
-
McCullough M. E. & Carter E. Pargament K. I., Exline J. J. & Jones J. W. Religion and self-regulation APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality 2013 Vol. 1 Washington, DC American Psychological Association 123 138
-
Piazza J. ‘If you love me keep my commandments’: Religiosity increases preference for rule-based moral arguments International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 2012 22 285 302
-
Piazza J. & Landy J. F. ‘Lean not on your own understanding’: Belief that morality is founded on divine authority and non-utilitarian moral thinking Judgment and Decision Making 2013 8 639 661
-
Piazza J. & Sousa P. Religiosity, political orientation, and consequentialist moral thinking Social Psychological and Personality Science 2014 5 334 342
-
Preston J. L., Salomon E. & Ritter R. S. Saroglou V. Religious prosociality: Personal, cognitive, and social factors Religion, personality, and social behavior 2014 New York, NY Psychology Press 149 169
-
Rothschild Z. K., Abdollahi A. & Pyszczynski T. Does peace have a prayer? The effect of mortality salience, compassionate values, and religious fundamentalism on hostility toward out-groups Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2009 45 816 827
-
Saroglou V. Religiousness as a cultural adaptation of basic traits: A Five Factor Model perspective Personality and Social Psychology Review 2010 14 108 125
-
Saroglou V. Pargament K. I., Exline J. J. & Jones J. W. Religion, spirituality, and altruism APA Handbook of psychology, religion and spirituality 2013 Vol. 1 Washington, DC American Psychological Association 439 457
-
Saroglou V. Saroglou V. Conclusion: Understanding religion and irreligion Religion, personality, and social behavior 2014 New York, NY Psychology Press 361 391
-
Saroglou V. & Mathijsen F. Religion, multiple identities, and acculturation: A study of Muslim immigrants in Belgium Archive for the Psychology of Religion 2007 29 177 198
-
Saroglou V., Van Pachterbeke M. & Dupont S. Abstract deontology versus care: The dark side of non-interpersonal morality 2010 Unpublished manuscript
-
Schweiker W. The Blackwell companion to religious ethics 2005 Malden, MA Blackwell
-
Shariff A., Piazza J. & Kramer S. Morality and the religious mind: Why theists and non-theists differ Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2014 18 439 441
-
Shariff A. F., Willard A. K., Andersen T. & Norenzayan A. Religious priming: A meta-analysis with a focus on prosociality Personality and Social Psychology Review 2016 20 27 48
-
Stavrova O. & Siegers P. Religious prosociality and morality across cultures: How social enforcement of religion shapes the effects of personal religiosity on prosocial and moral attitudes and behaviors Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2014 40 315 333
-
Szekely R. D., Opre A. & Miu A. C. Religiosity enhances emotion and deontological choice in moral dilemmas Personality and Individual Differences 2015 79 104 109
-
Tsang J. A., Rowatt W. C. & Shariff A. Schroeder D. A. & Graziano W. G. Religion and prosociality The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior 2015 New York, NY Oxford University Press 609 625
-
Turiel E. The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention 1983 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press
-
Van Pachterbeke M., Freyer C. & Saroglou V. When authoritarianism meets religion: Sacrificing others in the name of abstract deontology European Journal of Social Psychology 2011 41 898 903
-
Weeden J. & Kurzban R. What predicts religiosity? A multinational analysis of reproductive and cooperative morals Evolution and Human Behavior 2013 34 440 445
-
Weeden J., Cohen A. B. & Kenrick D. T. Religious attendance as reproductive support Evolution and Human Behavior 2008 29 327 334
-
Wink P., Dillon M. & Prettyman A. Religiousness, spiritual seeking, and authoritarianism: Findings from a longitudinal study Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 2007 46 321 345
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 517 | 51 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 229 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 53 | 0 | 0 |
Valuing Care Protects Religiosity from the Antisocial Consequences of Impersonal Deontology
In: Journal of Empirical TheologySearch for other papers by Csilla Deak in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vassilis Saroglou in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Morality typically includes prosociality but often also extends to impersonal deontology. Religion, theoretically and empirically, is concerned with both moral domains. What happens when the two domains are in conflict? Do religious people prefer impersonal deontology at the detriment of prosociality? Or do their prosocial inclinations allow them to transgress conflicting moral principles, for instance through white lies? Participants (177 Belgian adults) made a choice in several hypothetical moral dilemmas and were afterwards evaluated on Haidt’s moral foundations (care, fairness, authority, loyalty, and purity) and religiosity. When the conflict implied minor consequences for the target, religiosity predicted impersonal deontology at the detriment of prosociality, because of a high endorsement of purity. However, when the consequences were severe, religiosity was unrelated to impersonal deontology due to a suppressor effect of care. The findings indicate that prosocial dispositions shape religiosity into a ‘compassionate moral rigorism’, thus protecting it from excessive moralism.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 517 | 51 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 229 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 53 | 0 | 0 |
