Save

Meat and Religious Difference in Colonial India: the Courage and Contradictions of Sayyid Ahmad Khan

in Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient
Autor:in:
SherAli Tareen Franklin and Marshall College Lancaster, PA USA

Search for other papers by SherAli Tareen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6916-4669
Zitierung herunterladen Berechtigungen erhalten

Optionen für den Zugriff

Nutzen Sie bitte eine der untenstehenden Zugriffsmöglichkeiten, um den vollständigen Artikel zu lesen.

Institutszugang

Melden Sie sich mit Open Athens, Shibboleth oder Ihren institutionellen Anmeldedaten an.

Über Institut einloggen

Kauf

Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):

36,93 €

Weitere Zugriffsmöglichkeiten

Auf DeepDyve mieten
Token einlösen

Abstract

This article conducts a detailed reading of the paradigmatic South Asian Muslim modernist scholar Sayyid Ahmad Khan’s (d.1898) views on Indian Muslims dining with or eating the meat prepared and/or served by the British, as found in his Urdu/Arabic Text Rules on the Food of the People of the Book (Ahkam-i Ta‘am-i Ahl-i Kitab) composed in 1868. I argue that though Khan’s hermeneutic was saturated with Muslim traditionalist categories of inquiry and analysis, he ultimately remained wedded to a secular modernist privileging of a disembodied notion of religious authenticity that saw no harm in sites of embodied interreligious encounter like that of gastronomy. Conceptually thus, this article a) shows the impact and imprints of modern secular assumptions and desires on the thought of a Muslim scholar on a topic of profound ethical consequence, and b) highlights the limits but also the efficacy of the categories of modernist and traditionalist in the study of Islam.

Kennzahlen

Insgesamt Letzte 365 Tage In den letzten 30 Tagen
Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen 371 371 7
Gesamttextansichten 35 35 0
PDF-Downloads 86 86 0