While ShÄh WalÄ« AllÄhâs political letters have been the subject of much scholarly discussion, they are still deeply misunderstood. These misunderstandings are due, primarily, to erroneous attributions of recipients, misidentified individuals in the letters, and the failure to read these âpolitical lettersâ alongside WalÄ« AllÄhâs broader epistolographic corpus, contemporary biographical texts and political chronicles of the period. This article argues that far from being a critic of the Mughal Empire per se, WalÄ« AllÄh was closely associated with leading members of Ê¿ÄlamgÄ«r IIâs court. Moreover, his famous âinvitationâ to the Afghan ruler Aḥmad ShÄh AbdÄlÄ«, ostensibly asking him to invade Hindustan, should properly be understood as an ultimately unsuccessful attempt to attract the favorable attention of a military leader in order to mitigate the danger posed by his troops.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Alam, Muzaffar. 2009. The Mughals, the Sufi Shaikhs and the Formation of the Akbari Dispensation. Modern Asian Studies 43/1: 135â174.
Alam, Muzaffar and Sanjay Subrahmanyam. 2006. Envisioning Power: The Political Thought of a Late Eighteenth-Century Mughal Prince. Indian Economic and Social History Review 43/2: 131â161.
Anooshahr, Ali. 2009. The Ghazi Sultans and the Frontiers of Islam: A comparative study of the late medieval and early modern periods. London and New York: Routledge.
Anon. n.d. TÄrÄ«kh-i Ê¿ÄlamgÄ«r-i s̱ÄnÄ«. Manuscript # Or. 1749. British Library.
Anthony, Sean William. 2020. Muhammad and the Empires of Faith: The Making of the Prophet of Islam. Oakland: University of California Press.
BahrÄʾichÄ«, Muḥammad Naʿīm AllÄh ibn GhulÄm Quá¹b al-DÄ«n and Fozail Ahmad Qadri. 1981. Edition of Bisharat-i-Mazhariyah. M. Phil. Dissertation: Aligarh Muslim University.
Chenoy, Shama Mitra. 2018. Delhi in Transition, 1821 and Beyond: Mirza Sangin Begâs Sair-ul Manazil. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Faruqui, Munis D. 2009. At Empireâs End: The Nizam, Hyderabad and Eighteenth-Century India. Modern Asian Studies 43/1: 5â43.
Francklin, William. 1798. The History of the Reign of Shah-Aulum, The Present Emperor of Hindostaun. London: Cooper and Graham.
Ghazi, Mahmood A. 1982. Political Letters of ShÄh WalÄ« AllÄh: A Critical Review. Journal of the Pakistan Historical Society 30/2: 86â108.
IḥsÄn MujaddidÄ« SirhindÄ«, KhwÄjah Muḥammad. n.d. Rawáºat al-qayyÅ«miyya: aḥwÄl wa maqÄmÄt-i QayyÅ«m-i S̱ÄniÊ¿ Ḥaáºrat ḴáºwÄja Muḥammad Zubayr SirhindÄ«. LÄhawr: Maktaba-i Nabawiyya.
Irvine, William. 1907. Aḥmad Shah AbdÄlÄ«, and the Indian WazÄ«r, Ê¿ImÄd-ul-Mulk (1756â7). The Indian Antiquary 36: 10â18, 43â51, 55â70.
Irvine, William. n.d. Later Mughals, ed. by Jadunath Sarkar. 2 vols. Calcutta: M.C. Sarkar & Sons.
Jalal, Ayesha. 2008. Partisans of Allah: Jihad in South Asia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kaicker, Abhishek. 2014. Unquiet City: Making and Unmaking Politics in Mughal Delhi, 1707â39. Ph.D. Dissertation: Columbia University.
Kaicker, Abhishek. 2020. The King and the People: Sovereignty and Popular Politics in Mughal Delhi. New York: Oxford University Press.
Khan, Timur. 2022. A âGood Qaá¹£ba:â ChamkanÄ« and the Confluence of Politics, Economy and Religion in DurrÄnÄ« Peshawar, 1747â1834. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 65/4: 618â647.
Khoja, Neelam. 2020. Competing Sovereignties in Eighteenth-Century South Asia: Afghan Claims to Kingship. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 63/4: 555â581.
Morgan, Daniel. 2021. Spokesman of the unseen world: ShÄh WalÄ« AllÄh (1703â1762), Islamic reform and applied cosmology in late-Mughal Delhi. Ph.D. Dissertation: University of Chicago.
Morgan, Daniel. More Beneficial than Karl Marx: Ê¿Ubayd AllÄh SindhÄ« and modern receptions of ShÄh WalÄ« AllÄh. In Marxism in Muslim Contexts, ed. by Danielle Widmann Abraham, forthcoming.
NadwÄ«, Sayyid SulaymÄn. 1939. MusÄfir-i IslÄm HindÅ«stÄn ke ghurbatkade meá¹ . In Sayyid AbÅ« al-Ḥasan Ê¿AlÄ« NadwÄ«. SÄ«rat Sayyid Aḥmad ShahÄ«d. Lakhnauʾ: NÄmÄ« Pres: 7â16.
NaqwÄ«, Sayyid GhulÄm Ê¿AlÄ« KhÄn. 1897. Ê¿ImÄd al-saÊ¿Ädat. Maá¹baÊ¿-i MunshÄ« Nawal KishÅr.
Nizami, K.A. 1951.Shah Wali-Ullah Dehlavi and Indian Politics in the 18th Century. Islamic Culture 25/Jubilee Number, Part 1: 133â145.
Nizami, K.A 1965. NaqshbandÄ« Influence on Mughal Rulers and Politics. Islamic Culture 39: 41â53.
Nizami, K.A. 1980. ShÄh Waliullah of Delhi: His Thought and Contribution. Islamic Culture 54 (1980): 141â153.
Pernau, Margrit. 2006. Entangled Translations: The History of the Delhi College. In The Delhi College: Traditional Elites, the Colonial State, and Education Before 1857, ed. Margrit Pernau. New Delhi: Oxford University Press: 1â32.
PhulatÄ«, Muhammad Ê¿Äshiq. 1989. Al-Qawl al-jalÄ« fÄ« ẕikr Äs̱Är al-WalÄ«. DihlÄ«: ShÄh AbÅ« al-Khayr AkÄá¸emÄ«.
Rizvi, Saiyid Athar Abbas. 1980. ShÄh WalÄ«-AllÄh and His Times: A Study of Eighteenth Century IslÄm, Politics, and Society in India. Canberra: Maʾrifat Publishing.
Rizvi, Saiyid Athar Abbas. 1982. ShÄh Ê¿Abd Al-Ê¿AzÄ«z: Puritanism, Sectarian Polemics and JihÄd. Canberra: Maʾrifat Publishing.
Sarkar, Jadunath. 2008. Fall of the Mughal Empire. Vol. 1: 1739â1754. Calcutta: Orient BlackSwan.
Siddiqi, Zameeruddin. 1967. The Wizarat of Safdar Jang. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 29/1: 190â204.
SindhÄ«, Ê¿Ubayd AllÄh. 2008. ShÄh WalÄ« AllÄh awr unki siyÄsi taḥrÄ«k. Lahawr: Sindh SÄgar AkÄdemÄ«.
Srivastava, Ashirbadi Lal. 1933. The First Two Nawabs of Oudh (A Critical Study Based on Original Sources). Lucknow: The Upper India Publishing House, Ltd.
Srivastava, Ashirbadi Lal. 1961. Shuja-ud-Daulah, vol 1: 1754â1765. Delhi: Shiva Lal Agarwala & Co.
Tareen, SherAli. 2020. South Asian QurʾÄn Commentaries and Translations: A Preliminary Intellectual History. ReOrient 5/2: 233â256.
Tarzi, Amin. 2015. Tarikh-i Ahmad Shahi: The First History of âAfghanistan. In Afghan History Through Afghan Eyes, ed. Nile Green. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 79â98.
Umar, Muhammad. 1998. Muslim Society in Northern India During the Eighteenth Century. Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.
WalÄ« AllÄh al-DihlawÄ«, ShÄh. 1352 [1933]. Al-Khayr al-kathÄ«r. Bijnor: MadÄ«na Pres.
WalÄ« AllÄh al-DihlawÄ«, ShÄh. 1969. ShÄh WalÄ« DihlawÄ« ke siyÄsÄ« maktÅ«bÄt. Ed. KhÄliq Aḥmad NiáºÄmÄ«. DihlÄ«: Nadwat al-Muá¹£annifÄ«n.
WalÄ« AllÄh al-DihlawÄ«, ShÄh. 2004. MakÄtÄ«b-i Ḥaáºrat ShÄh WalÄ« AllÄh Muḥaddis̱ DihlawÄ«. Ed. MuftÄ« NasÄ«m Aḥmad FarÄ«dÄ« AmrohawÄ«. RÄmpÅ«r: KitÄb KhÄna-i RaáºÄ.
Williams, Richard. 2016. Krishnaâs Neglected Responsibilities: Religious Devotion and Social Critique in Eighteenth-Century North India. Modern Asian Studies 50/ 5: 1403â1440.
Yilmaz, HuÌseyin. 2018. Caliphate Redefined: The Mystical Turn in Ottoman Political Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Zaman, Muhammad Qasim. 2020. Political Power, Religious Authority, and the Caliphate in Eighteenth-Century Indian Islamic Thought. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 30/2: 313â340.
Ziad, Waleed. 2017. Transporting Knowledge in the Durrani Empire: Two Manuals of NaqshbandÄ«-Mujaddidi Sufi Practice. In Afghanistanâs Islam: From Conversion to the Taliban, ed. Nile Green. Oakland: University of California Press: 105â126.
Ziad, Waleed. 2021. Hidden Caliphate: Sufi Saints beyond the Oxus and Indus. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 2052 | 987 | 106 |
| Full Text Views | 61 | 13 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 219 | 29 | 0 |
While ShÄh WalÄ« AllÄhâs political letters have been the subject of much scholarly discussion, they are still deeply misunderstood. These misunderstandings are due, primarily, to erroneous attributions of recipients, misidentified individuals in the letters, and the failure to read these âpolitical lettersâ alongside WalÄ« AllÄhâs broader epistolographic corpus, contemporary biographical texts and political chronicles of the period. This article argues that far from being a critic of the Mughal Empire per se, WalÄ« AllÄh was closely associated with leading members of Ê¿ÄlamgÄ«r IIâs court. Moreover, his famous âinvitationâ to the Afghan ruler Aḥmad ShÄh AbdÄlÄ«, ostensibly asking him to invade Hindustan, should properly be understood as an ultimately unsuccessful attempt to attract the favorable attention of a military leader in order to mitigate the danger posed by his troops.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 2052 | 987 | 106 |
| Full Text Views | 61 | 13 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 219 | 29 | 0 |