Save

Rethinking Kingship and Authority in South Asia: Amber (Rajasthan), ca. 1560-1615

In: Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient
Author:
Ramya Sreenivasan University of Pennsylvania rsreenivasan@sas.upenn.edu

Search for other papers by Ramya Sreenivasan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€36.93

The literature on South Asian kingship has typically explored the idioms in which kingship—a king’s assertion of his right to rule—was articulated, while assuming ready consent to such assertions of royal authority among a king’s subjects, vassals, peers, and overlords. This paper re-examines the nature and limits of South Asian kingship by investigating the modes in which Man Singh Kachhwaha, a prominent regional chief in the Mughal Empire, claimed royal status. I examine how target audiences—consisting of literati, peers, rivals, and the Mughal overlord—may have received an ambitious chief’s claims to kingly status in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. This essay reinterprets the abundant evidence from Man Singh’s reign to reveal the character of kingship in South Asia as much more circumscribed and contingent than has often been assumed, and as continually open to challenge and contestation.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1376 175 24
Full Text Views 306 9 0
PDF Views & Downloads 174 20 0