As English-medium instruction (EMI) continues to expand globally, meeting the needs of diverse student cohorts in multilingual and multicultural settings remains a major challenge. This study investigates the inclusivity of EMI at the Faculty of Architecture (FoA) at one of Polandâs leading public universities. Drawing on interview data from 11 architecture students, we conducted Reflexive Thematic Analysis to explore their experiences and perceptions of lecturersâ instructional practices, with particular attention to their alignment with Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principlesâan intersection previously unexplored in EMI research. Three themes were identified: disciplinary knowledge development, language practices, and the social-affective environment. This article focuses on the first two. Findings reveal that UDL principles are only partially reflected in the EMI programme. Students are rarely offered meaningful choice in content, topics, or tools for assignments and assessment. Instruction remains largely teacher-centred, with limited use of varied presentation modes to accommodate diverse learning preferences. Major concerns also include poor accessibility of teaching materials and insufficient English proficiency of some lecturers, which hinders content comprehension. In addition, the frequent use of Polishâby both staff and local studentsâleaves international students feeling excluded. These findings underscore the urgent need to adapt instructional and language practices in EMI to better support student diversity and foster more inclusive, universally designed learning environments, in turn enhancing the overall quality of EMI.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Airey, John. 2020. The content lecturer and English-medium instruction (EMI): epilogue to the special issue on EMI in higher education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 23: 340â346.
Almeqdad, Qais I., Ali M. Alodat, Mahmoud F. Alquraan, Mohammad A. Mohaidat & Alaa K. Al-Makhzoomy. 2023. The effectiveness of universal design for learning: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Cogent Education 10. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2218191
Akintayo, Olateju T., Chima A. Eden, Oyebola O. Ayeni & Nneamaka C. Onyebuchi. 2024. Inclusive curriculum design: meeting the diverse needs of students for social improvement. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences 6: 770â784.
Barahona, Malba, Viviana David, Francisca Gallegos, José Reyes-Rojas, Ximena Ibaceta-Quijanes & Stephen Darwin. 2023. Analysing preservice teachersâ enactment of the UDL framework to support diverse students in a remote teaching context. System 114: 103027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103027
Beltrán-Palanques, Vicent & Edgar Bernad-Mechó. 2024. Current Trends in EMI and Multimodality in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
Bendazzoli, Claudio, Sarah Crielesi, Slobodanka Dimova, Branka Drljaca MargiÄ, Montse Irun, Joyce Kling, Sanne Larsen, Denise McAllister Wylie, Irena MestroviÄ Stajduhar, Alessandra Molino, Virginia Pulcini, Xavier Martin Rubio, Martin Solly & Irena Vodopija-KrstanoviÄ. 2020. TAEC Erasmus+ project (2017â2020): EMI HANDBOOK. https://cip.ku.dk/english/projects-and-collaborations/taec/TAEC_Handbook_FEB_2020_NoEdit.pdf
Bowles, Hugo & Amanda C. Murphy, eds. 2020. English-medium Instruction and the Internationalization of Universities. Berlin: Springer.
Braun, Virginia & Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77â101.
Braun, Virginia & Victoria Clarke. 2013. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. London: SAGE.
Braun, Virginia & Victoria Clarke. 2022. Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: SAGE.
Braun, Virginia & Victoria Clarke. 2023. Toward good practice in thematic analysis: avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health 24: 1â6.
Braun, Virginia & Victoria Clarke. 2025. Reporting guidelines for qualitative research: a values-based approach. Qualitative Research in Psychology 22: 399â438.
CAST. 2024. Universal Design for Learning guidelines version 3.0. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/
Dafouz, Emma & Ute Smit. 2020. Road-mapping English Medium Education in the Internationalised University. Berlin: Springer.
Dearden, Julie. 2014. English as a medium of instructionâa growing global phenomenon: phase 1 (Interim report). British Council & University of Oxford, UK.
Dearden, Julie & Ernesto Macaro. 2016. Higher education teachersâ attitudes towards English medium instruction: a three-country comparison. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 6: 455â486.
Dickinson, Paul. 2018. Addressing current and future challenges in EAL writing with Universal Design for Learning. In P. Taalas, J. Jalkanen, L. Bradley & S. Thouësny (eds), Future-proof CALL: language learning as exploration and encountersâshort papers from EUROCALL 2018, 41â46. Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.26.810
Doiz, Aintzane & David Lasagabaster. 2021. An analysis of the use of cognitive discourse functions in English-medium history teaching at university. English for Specific Purposes 62: 58â69.
Emihovich, Benjamin. 2024. Implementing universal design for learning in online courses to support multilingual students in higher education. The CATESOL Journal 35. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4c87h7rf
Espada-Chavarria, Rosa, Rayco H. González-Montesino, José Luis López-BastÃas & Miriam DÃaz-Vega. 2023. Universal design for learning and instruction: effective strategies for inclusive higher education. Education Sciences 13: article 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060620
Fornauf, Beth S. & Joy Dangora Erickson. 2020. Toward an inclusive pedagogy through universal design for learning in higher education: a review of the literature. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability 33: 183â199.
Fürstenberg, Ulla, Tom Morton, Petra Kletzenbauer & Margit Reitbauer. 2022. âI wouldnât say there is anything language specificâ: the disconnect between tertiary CLIL teachersâ understanding of the general communicative and pedagogical functions of language. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning 14: 293â322.
Galloway, Nicola & Heath Rose. 2021. English medium instruction and the English language practitioner. ELT Journal 75: 33â41.
Hakel, Katja & Melanie Magin. 2024. The impact of professional development training on facultyâs integration of universal design for learning in daily teaching practices. International Journal of Inclusive Education 12: 1â16.
Halliday, Michael A.K. 2007. Language and Education. London: Bloomsbury.
Han, Chen & Jianghua Lei. 2024. Teachersâ and studentsâ beliefs towards universal design for learning framework: a scoping review. Sage Open 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241272032
Hillman, Sara, Wendy Li, Curtis Green-Eneix & Peter I. De Costa. 2023. The emotional landscape of English medium instruction (EMI) in higher education. Linguistics and Education 75: 1â6.
Lyster, Roy. 2007. Learning and Teaching Languages through Content: A Counterbalanced Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lyster, Roy & Yolanda Ruiz De Zarobe. 2018. Introduction: instructional practices and teacher development in CLIL and immersion school settings. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 21: 273â274.
Macaro, Ernesto. 2018. English Medium Instruction: Content and Language in Policy and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mace, Ronald. 1985. Universal design: barrier-free environments for everyone. Designers West 33: 147â152.
McKinley, Jim & Heath Rose. 2022. English language teaching and English-medium instruction. Journal of English-Medium Instruction 1: 85â104.
McKinley, Jim, Heath Rose & Xiao Lan Curdt-Christiansen. 2022. EMI in Chinese higher education: the muddy water of âEnglishisationâ. Applied Linguistics Review 14: 1475â1481.
Moriña, Anabel, Rafael Carballo & Ana Doménech. 2025. Transforming higher education: a systematic review of faculty training in UDL and its benefits. Teaching in Higher Education 12: 1â18.
Morton, Tom. 2018. Reconceptualizing and describing teachersâ knowledge of language for content and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 21: 275â286.
Paul Hanna & Shadreck Mwale. 2017. âIâm not with you, yet I am â¦â Virtual face-to-face interviews. In V. Braun, V. Clarke and D. Gray (eds), Collecting Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide to Textual, Media and Virtual Techniques, 256â274. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rao, Kavita, Emily Garant-Jones, Bonnie Amelia Dean & Michelle J. Eady. 2024. Applying universal design for learning to work-integrated learning: designing for inclusion and equity. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning 25: 67â81.
Richards, Jack C. & Jack Pun. 2022. Introduction. In J.C. Richards & J. Pun (eds), Teaching and Learning in English Medium Instruction, 1â6. London: Routledge.
Rose, Heath, Samantha Curle, Ikuya Aizawa & Gene Thompson. 2020. What drives success in English medium taught courses? The interplay between language proficiency, academic skills, and motivation. Studies in Higher Education 45: 2149â2161.
Rubio-Alcala, Fernando D. & Do Coyle (eds). 2021. Developing and Evaluating Quality Bilingual Practices in Higher Education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Sahan, Kari & Heath Rose. 2021. Translanguaging or code-switching? Re-examining the functions of language in EMI classrooms. In B. Di Sabato & B. Hughes (eds), Multilingual Perspectives from Europe and Beyond on Language Policy and Practice, 348â356. Abingdon: Routledge.
Scrivener, Jim. 2011. Learning Teaching: The Essential Guide to English Language Teaching (3rd ed.). London: Macmillan Education.
Shraga-Roitman, Yael, Revital Cohen-Liverant, Shira Soffer-Vital, Idit Finkelstein & Tsfira Grebelsky-Lichtman. 2023. Towards multicultural, inclusive and diverse evaluationâexploring post-secondary studentsâ perceptions. Intercultural Education 34: 378â395.
Soffer-Vital, Shira and Idit Finkelstein. 2023. Towards a new multi-modality campus: unboxing Pandoraâs box. Intercultural Education 34: 396â411.
Taguchi, Naoko. 2014. English-medium education in the global society. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 52: 89â98.
Tai, Kevin W.H. & Li Wei. 2021. Constructing playful talk through translanguaging in English Medium Instruction mathematics classrooms. Applied Linguistics 42: 607â640.
Thapaliya, Mukti. 2025. Teaching ESL/EFL/ESOL students through universal design for learning. In R.A. Giri & L. Gnawali (eds), The Handbook of English Language Education in Nepal, 204â218. New Delhi: Routledge India.
TimuÈ, Natalia, Michelle E. Bartlett, James E. Bartlett, Suzanne Ehrlich & Zakaria Babutsidze. 2023. Fostering inclusive higher education through universal design for learning and inclusive pedagogyâEU and US faculty perceptions. Higher Education Research & Development 43: 473â487.
Qu, Xiao & Beth Cross. 2024. UDL for inclusive higher educationâwhat makes group work effective for diverse international students in UK? International Journal of Educational Research 123: article 102277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102277
Yaqoubi, Tahera, Zahra Mohammadi & Jawad Golzar. 2022. An analysis of universal design for learning at collegial level: effective ways to maximise learning outcomes, inclusion, and equity. Research in Post-Compulsory Education 27: 594â621.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 300 | 300 | 8 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 16 | 16 | 1 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 41 | 41 | 0 |
As English-medium instruction (EMI) continues to expand globally, meeting the needs of diverse student cohorts in multilingual and multicultural settings remains a major challenge. This study investigates the inclusivity of EMI at the Faculty of Architecture (FoA) at one of Polandâs leading public universities. Drawing on interview data from 11 architecture students, we conducted Reflexive Thematic Analysis to explore their experiences and perceptions of lecturersâ instructional practices, with particular attention to their alignment with Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principlesâan intersection previously unexplored in EMI research. Three themes were identified: disciplinary knowledge development, language practices, and the social-affective environment. This article focuses on the first two. Findings reveal that UDL principles are only partially reflected in the EMI programme. Students are rarely offered meaningful choice in content, topics, or tools for assignments and assessment. Instruction remains largely teacher-centred, with limited use of varied presentation modes to accommodate diverse learning preferences. Major concerns also include poor accessibility of teaching materials and insufficient English proficiency of some lecturers, which hinders content comprehension. In addition, the frequent use of Polishâby both staff and local studentsâleaves international students feeling excluded. These findings underscore the urgent need to adapt instructional and language practices in EMI to better support student diversity and foster more inclusive, universally designed learning environments, in turn enhancing the overall quality of EMI.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 300 | 300 | 8 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 16 | 16 | 1 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 41 | 41 | 0 |