Leaf litter affects the survival and predation rates for large and small Pinus seeds in the Qinling Mountains, China
äºIsrael Journal of Ecology and EvolutionNorthwest A & F University, Yangling District
Research Center for Zhongyuan Cultural Ecology, Henan Normal University
Search for other papers by Fei Yu in
Current site
Google Scholar
Northwest A & F University, Yangling District
Search for other papers by Xiaoxiao Shi in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Kailu Wei in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Dexiang Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
It is generally accepted that leaf litter covers seeds, which may be beneficial for their survival, but it is unclear whether leaf litter contributes in different ways to the survival of plant seeds with contrasting sizes. In this study, we examined the effect of different levels of leaf litter coverage on seed predation and foraging/caching for small-seeded Pinus tabulaeformis and large-seeded Pinus armandii in the Qinling Mountains, China. Our results showed that leaf litter failed to protect P. armandii seeds from being removed by small rodents, whereas it improved seed survival for P. tabulaeformis. P. tabulaeformis were eaten in situ, whereas more P. armandii seeds were eaten in the high leaf litter coverage plots. Therefore, we propose that leaf litter affects the survival and predation rates for large and small Pinus seeds in the Qinling Mountains, China.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Blate GM, , Peart DR, , Leighton M. 1998. Post-dispersal predation on isolated seeds: a comparative study of 40 tree species in a Southeast Asian rainforest. Oikos. 82:522â538.
-
Brewer SW. 2001. Predation and dispersal of large and small seeds of a tropical palm. Oikos. 92:245â255.
-
Brewer SW, , Rejmanek M. 1999. Small rodents as significant dispersers of tree seeds in a neotropical forest. J Vegetation Sci. 10:165â174.
-
Brown JS. 1988. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behavioral Ecol Sociobiol. 22:37â47.
-
Briggs JS, , Vander Wall SB, , Jenkins SH. 2009. Forest rodents provide directed dispersal of Jeffrey pine seeds. Ecology. 90:675â687.
-
Chang G, , Jin TZ, , Pei JF, , Chen XN, , Zhang B, , Shi ZJ. 2012. Seed dispersal of three sympatric oak species by forest rodents in the Qinling Mountains, Central China. Plant Ecol. 213:1633â1642.
-
Cintra R.1997. Leaf litter effects on seed and seedling predation of the palm Astrocaryummurumuru and the legume tree Dipteryxmicrantha in Amazonian forest. J Tropical Ecol. 13:709â725.
-
Clark CJ, , Poulsen JR, , Bolker BM, , Connor EF, . Parker VT. 2005. Comparative seed shadows of bird-, monkey-, and wind-dispersed trees. Ecology. 86:2684â2694.
-
Den Ouden J, , Jansen PA, , Smit R, . 2004. Jays, mice and oaks: predation and dispersal of Quercusrobur and Q.petraeain north-western Europe. In: Forget PM, , Lambert JE, , Hulme PE, , Vander Wall SB, editors. Seed fate: predation, dispersal and seedling establishment. Wallingford: CAB International; p. 223â240.
-
Duncan RS, , Chapman CA. 1999. Seed dispersal and potential forest succession in abandoned agriculture in tropical Africa. Ecol Appl. 9:998â1008.
-
Facelli JM, , Pickett STA. 1991. Plant litter: effects on community structure. Botanical Rev. 57:1â32.
-
Fedriani JM, , Manzaneda AJ. 2005. Pre-and postdispersal seed predation by rodents: balance of food and safety. Behavioral Ecol. 16:1018â1024.
-
Forget JM. 1991. Scatterhoarding of Astrocaryumparamaca by Proechimys in French Guiana: comparisons with Myoproctaexilis. Tropical Ecol. 32:155â167.
-
Forget PM, , Milleron T, , Feer F. 1998. Patterns in post-dispersal seed removal by neotropical rodents and seed fate in relation to seed size.In: Proceedings of the Dynamics of Tropical Communities: The 37th Symposium of the British Ecological Society; 1998; 25â49.
-
Garb J, , Kotler BP, , Brown JS. 2000. Foraging and community consequences of seed size for coexisting Negev Desert granivores. Oikos. 88:291â300.
-
Harper JL. 1977. Population biology of plants. New York (NY): Academic Press.
-
Hirsch BT, , Kays R, , Jansen PA. 2012. A telemetric thread tag for tracking seed dispersal by scatter-hoarding rodents. Plant Ecol. 213:933â943.
-
Hoshizaki K, , Suzuki W, , Nakashizuka T. 1999. Evaluation of secondary dispersal in a large-seeded tree Aesculusturbinata: a test of directed dispersal. Plant Ecol. 144:167â176.
-
Jansen PA, , Bartholomeus M, , Bongers F, , Elzinga JA, , Ouden J, , Van Wieren SE, . 2002. The role of seed size in dispersal by a scatter-hoarding rodent. In: Levey D, , Silva WR, , Galetti M, editors. Seed dispersal and frugivory: ecology, evolution and conservation. Wallingford: CABI Publishing; p. 209â225.
-
Jansen PA, , Hemerik L, , Bongers F. 2004. Seed mass and mast seeding enhance dispersal by a neotropical scatter-hoarding rodent. Ecol Monograph. 74:369â389.
-
Jorge MLSP, , Brown JS, , van der Merwe M. 2012. Handling time and the evolution of caching behavior. Behavioral Ecol. 23:410â417.
-
Kotler BP, , Brown JS, , Oldfield A, , Thorson J, , Cohen D. 2001. Foraging substrate and escape substrate: patch use by three species of gerbils. Ecology. 82:1781â1790.
-
Lai X, , Guo C, , Xiao ZS. 2013. Trait-mediated seed predation, dispersal and survival among frugivore-dispersed plants in a fragmented subtropical forest, Southwest China. Integrative Zool. doi: .
-
Li HJ, , Zhang ZB. 2003. Effect of rodents on acorn dispersal and survival of the Liaodong oak (Quercusliaotungensis Koidz.). Forest Ecol Manage. 176:387â396.
-
Li HJ, , Zhang HM, , Zhang ZB. 2006. Acorn removal of Liaodong oak (Quercusliaotungensis) by rodents. Acta Theriologica Sinica. 26:8â12.
-
Lima SL, , Valone TJ, , Caraco T. 1985. Foraging efficiency, predation risk trade off in the grey squirrel. Anim Behav. 33:155â165.
-
Lu JQ, , Zhang ZB. 2004. Effects of habitat and season on removal and hoarding of seeds of wild apricot (Prunusarmeniaca) by small rodents. Acta Oecologica. 26:247â254.
-
Moles AT, , Warton DI, , Westoby M. 2003. Do small-seeded species have higher survival through seed predation than large-seeded species? Ecology. 84:3148â3161.
-
Moles AT, , Westoby M. 2003. Latitude, seed predation and seed mass. J Biogeography. 30:105â128.
-
Moles AT, , Westoby M. 2006. Seed size and plant strategy across the whole life cycle. Oikos. 113:91â105.
-
Price MV, , Jenkins SH, . 1986. Rodents as seed consumers and dispersers. In Murray DR., editor. Seed dispersal. New York (NY): Academic Press; p. 191â234.
-
Scheper J, , Smit C. 2011 The role of rodents in the seed fate of a thorny shrub in an ancient wood pasture. Acta Oecologica. 37:133â139.
-
Schmidt KA, , Ostfeld RS. 2003. Mice in space: space use predicts the interaction between mice and songbirds. Ecology. 84:3276â3283.
-
Smit C, , Verwijmeren M. 2011. Tree-shrub associations in grazed woodlands: first rodents, then cattle? Plant Ecol. 212:483â493.
-
Smythe N. 1989. Seed survival in the palm Astrocaryumstandleyanum: evidence for dependence upon its seed dispersers. Biotropica. 21:50â56.
-
Vander Wall SB. 1990. Food hoarding in animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Vander Wall SB. 1995. The effects of seed value on the caching behavior of yellow pine chipmunks. Oikos. 74:533â537.
-
Vander Wall SB. 2003. Effects of seed size of wind-dispersed pines(Pinus) on secondary seed dispersal and the caching behaviorof rodents. Oikos. 100:25â34.
-
Wang B, , Chen J. 2009. Seed size, more than nutrient or tannin content, affects seed caching behavior of a common genus of Old World rodents. Ecology. 90:3023â3032.
-
Willson MF. 1993. Dispersal mode, seed shadows, and colonization patterns. Vegetatio. 107â108:261â280.
-
Xiao ZS, , Wang YS, , Harris M, , Zhang ZB. 2006. Spatial and temporal variation of seed predation and removal of sympatric large-seeded species in relation to innate seed traits in a subtropical forest, Southwest China. Forest Ecol Manage. 222:46â54.
-
Xiao ZS, , Jansen PA, , Zhang ZB. 2006. Using seed-tagging methods for assessing post-dispersal seed fate in rodent-dispersed trees. Forest Ecol Manage. 223:18â23.
-
Xiao ZS, , Zhang ZB, , Wang YS. 2005. Effects of seed size on dispersal distance in five rodent-dispersed fagaceous species. Acta Oecologica. 18:221â229.
-
Yan XF, , Zhou LB, , Liu JL. 2012. Effects of different habitats and coverage treatments on the fates of Quercuswutaishanica seeds under the predation pressure of rodents. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 32:2778â2787.
-
Yan XF, , Yu YC, , Zhou LB, , Zhou YF. 2012. Seed predation and removal of Quercuswutaishanica, Prunussalicina and Pinusarmandii by rodents in the Liupan Mountains. Biodiversity Sci. 20:427â436.
-
Yi XF, , Zhang ZB. 2008. Seed predation and dispersal of glabrous filbert (Corylusheterophylla) and pilose filbert (Corylusmandshurica) by small mammals in a temperate forest, northeast China. Plant Ecol. 196:135â142.
-
Yu F, , Wang DX, , Shi XX, , Yi XF, , Li G. 2013a. Seed dispersal by small rodents favours oak over pine regeneration in the pine-oak forests of the Qinling Mountains, China. Scandinavian J Forest Res. 28:540â549.
-
Yu F, , Wang DX, , Shi XX, , Yi XF, , Huang QP, , Hu YN. 2013b. Effects of environmental factors on tree seedling regeneration in a pine-oak mixed forest in the Qinling Mountains, China. J Mountain Sci. 10:845â853.
-
Zhang HM, , Zhang ZB. 2008. Endocarp thickness affects seed removal speed by small rodents in a warm-temperate broad-leafed deciduous forest, China. Acta Oecologica. 34:285â293.
-
Zhang ZB, , Wang FS. 2001. Effect of rodents on seed dispersal and survival of wild apricot (Prunusarmeniaca). Acta Ecologica Sinica. 21:839â845.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 498 | 87 | 10 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 11 | 0 | 0 |
Leaf litter affects the survival and predation rates for large and small Pinus seeds in the Qinling Mountains, China
äºIsrael Journal of Ecology and EvolutionNorthwest A & F University, Yangling District
Research Center for Zhongyuan Cultural Ecology, Henan Normal University
Search for other papers by Fei Yu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Northwest A & F University, Yangling District
Search for other papers by Xiaoxiao Shi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kailu Wei in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dexiang Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
It is generally accepted that leaf litter covers seeds, which may be beneficial for their survival, but it is unclear whether leaf litter contributes in different ways to the survival of plant seeds with contrasting sizes. In this study, we examined the effect of different levels of leaf litter coverage on seed predation and foraging/caching for small-seeded Pinus tabulaeformis and large-seeded Pinus armandii in the Qinling Mountains, China. Our results showed that leaf litter failed to protect P. armandii seeds from being removed by small rodents, whereas it improved seed survival for P. tabulaeformis. P. tabulaeformis were eaten in situ, whereas more P. armandii seeds were eaten in the high leaf litter coverage plots. Therefore, we propose that leaf litter affects the survival and predation rates for large and small Pinus seeds in the Qinling Mountains, China.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 498 | 87 | 10 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 11 | 0 | 0 |
