Seed size has been considered a key factor influencing the dynamics of plant communities, but few empirical, within-community predictions have been made based on seed size. Data on species density, biomass, frequency, and seed size were measured in alpine meadows with different grazing gradients in Northwest China. Seed mass variance and range within community were analyzed and relationships between seed size and density, biomass, and frequency within community were evaluated. Our results showed that vegetation height, coverage, and productivity decreased significantly with increasing grazing intensity. Species richness and total individual density were greatest in moderately-grazed meadow. Mean seed mass, mean coefficient of variation of seed mass, and seed mass range within community showed a consistent trend of moderately-grazed meadow > ungrazed meadow > heavily-grazed meadow. Correlation analyses showed that seed size was positively related to species density, biomass, and frequency within community in ungrazed meadow, but was negatively related to species density, biomass, and frequency within community in heavily-grazed meadow. Our study suggests that grazing disturbance can alter the relationship between seed size and dominance for coexistent species within communities. With increasing grazing intensity, the advantages of species density, biomass, and frequency were switched from the larger-seeded species to the smaller-seeded species within the community.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Aarssen, L. W., Jordan, C. Y. 2001. Between-species patterns of covariation in plant size, seed size and fecundity in monocarpic herbs. Ecoscience 8: 471-477.
Cingolani, A. M., Noy-Meir, I., D�az, S. 2005. Grazing effects on rangeland diversity: a synthesis of contemporary models. Ecol. Appl. 15: 757-773.
Connell, J. H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forest and coral reefs. Science 199: 1302-1310.
Coomes, D. A., Grubb, P. J. 2003. Colonization, tolerance, competition and seed-size variation within functional groups. Trend Ecol. Evol. 18: 283-291.
Coomes, D. A., Rees, M., Grubb, P. J., Turnbull, L. 2002. Are differences in seed mass among species important in structuring plant communities? Evidence from analyses of spatial and temporal variation in dune-annual populations. Oikos 96: 421-432.
Cosyns, E., Delporte, A., Lens, L., Hoffmann, M. 2005. Germination success of temperate grassland species after passage through ungulate and rabbit guts. J. Ecol. 93: 353-361.
Falster, D. S., Westoby, M. 2003. Plant height and evolutionary games. Trend Ecol. Evol. 18: 337-343.
G�mez, J. M. 2004. Bigger is not always better: Conflicting selective pressures on seed size in Quercus ilex. Evolution 58: 71-80.
Grime, J. P. 1974. Vegetation classification by reference to strategies. Nature 250: 26-31.
Guo, Q. F. 2003. Plant abundance: the measurement and relationship with seed size. Oikos 101: 639-642.
Guo, Q., Thompson, D. B., Valone, T. J., Brown, J. H. 1995. The effects of vertebrate granivores and folivores on plant community structure in the Chihuahuan Desert. Oikos 73: 251-259.
Guo, Q., Brown, J. H., Valone, T. J., Kachman, S. D. 2000. Constraints of seed size on plant distribution and abundance. Ecology 81: 2149-2155.
Hanley, M. E., Cordier, P. K., May, O., Kelly, C. K. 2007. Seed size and seedling growth: differential response of Australian and British Fabaceae to nutrient limitation. New Phytol. 174: 381-388.
Hao, X. 2008. A green fervor sweeps the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Science 321: 633-635.
Henery, M. L., Westoby, M. 2001. Seed mass and seed nutrient content as predictors of seed output variation between species. Oikos 92: 479-490.
Jakobsson, A., Eriksson, O. 2000. A comparative study of seed number, seed size, seedling size and recruitment in grassland plants. Oikos 88: 494-502.
Kadmon, R., Benjamini, Y. 2006. Effects of productivity and disturbance on species richness: a neutral model. Am. Nat. 167: 939-946.
Kleyer, M. 1999. Distribution of plant functional types along gradients of disturbance intensity and resource supply in an agricultural landscape. J. Veg. Sci. 10: 697-708.
Leishman, M. R., Murray, B. R. 2001. The relationship between seed size and abundance in plant communities: model predictions and observed patterns. Oikos 94: 151-161.
Leishman, M. R., Westoby, M. 1994. The role of large seeds in seedling establishment in dry soil conditions—experimental evidence for semi-arid species. J. Ecol. 82: 249-258.
Leishman, M. R., Westoby, M., Jurado, E. 1995. Correlates of seed size variation: a comparison among five temperate floras. J. Ecol. 83: 517-530.
McGlynn, T. P., Weiser, M. D., Dunn, R. R. 2010. More individuals but fewer species: testing the more individuals hypothesis in a diverse tropical fauna. Biol. Lett. in press; doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0103.
Moles, A. T., Westoby, M. 2004. What do seedlings die from, and what are the implications for evolution of seed size? Oikos 106: 193-199.
Moles, A. T., Westoby, M. 2006. Seed size and plant strategy across the whole life cycle. Oikos 113: 91-105.
Moles, A. T., Ackerly, D. D., Webb, C. O., Tweddle, J. C., Dickie, J. B., Westoby, M. 2005. A brief history of seed size. Science 307: 576-580.
Muller-Landau, H. C. 2003. Seeds of understanding of plant diversity-traits important to competitive ability are variable and subject to evolutionary change. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 1469-1471.
Murray, B. R., Leishman, M. R. 2003. On the relationship between seed mass and species abundance in plant communities. Oikos 101: 643-645.
Murray, B. R., Kelaher, B. P., Hose, G. C., Figueira, W. F. 2005. A meta-analysis of the interspecific relationship between seed size and plant abundance within local communities. Oikos 110:191194.
Niering, W. A. 1987. Vegetation dynamics (succession and climax) in relation to plant community management. Cons. Biol. 1: 287-295.
Ozinga, W. A., Bekker, R. M., Schamin�e, J. H. J., Van Groenendael, J. M. 2004. Dispersal potential in plant communities depends on environmental conditions. J. Ecol. 92:767-777.
Pakeman, R. J., Digneffe, G., Small, J. L. 2002. Ecological correlates of endozoochory by herbivores. Funct. Ecol. 90: 296-304.
Rees, M. 1995. Community structure in sand dune annuals: Is seed weight a key quantity? J. Ecol. 83: 857-863.
Rees, M., Westoby, M. 1997. Game theoretical evolution of seed mass in multi-species ecological models. Oikos 78: 116-126.
Rees, M., Condit, R., Crawley, M., Westoby, M. 2001. Long-term studies of vegetation dynamics. Science 293: 650-655.
Ren, Q. J., Wu, G. L., Ren, G. H. 2009. Effect of grazing intensity on characteristics of alpine meadow communities in the eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Acta Prataculture Sin. 18: 256-261.
Smith, C. C., Fretwell, D. 1974. The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am. Nat. 108: 499-506.
Swanborough, P., Westoby, M. 1996. Seedling relative growth rate and its components in relation to seed size: phylogenetically independent contrasts. Funct. Ecol. 10: 176-184.
Thompson, K., Bakker, J. P., Bekker, R. M., Hodgson, J. G. 1998. Ecological correlates of seed persistence in soil in the north-west European flora. J. Ecol. 86: 163-169.
Tilman, D. 1988. Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Uriarte, M., Reeve, H. K. 2003. Matchmaking and species marriage: a game-theory model of community assembly. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 1787-1792.
Wu, G. L., Du, G. Z. 2009. Seed mass in Kobresia-dominated communities in alpine meadows at two different elevations. Israel J. Ecol. Evol. 55: 31-40.
Wu, G. L., Du, G. Z., Liu, Z. H., Thirgood, S. 2009. Effect of fencing and grazing on a Kobresia-dominated meadow in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Plant Soil 319: 115-126.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 464 | 101 | 20 |
| Full Text Views | 42 | 9 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 18 | 0 | 0 |
Seed size has been considered a key factor influencing the dynamics of plant communities, but few empirical, within-community predictions have been made based on seed size. Data on species density, biomass, frequency, and seed size were measured in alpine meadows with different grazing gradients in Northwest China. Seed mass variance and range within community were analyzed and relationships between seed size and density, biomass, and frequency within community were evaluated. Our results showed that vegetation height, coverage, and productivity decreased significantly with increasing grazing intensity. Species richness and total individual density were greatest in moderately-grazed meadow. Mean seed mass, mean coefficient of variation of seed mass, and seed mass range within community showed a consistent trend of moderately-grazed meadow > ungrazed meadow > heavily-grazed meadow. Correlation analyses showed that seed size was positively related to species density, biomass, and frequency within community in ungrazed meadow, but was negatively related to species density, biomass, and frequency within community in heavily-grazed meadow. Our study suggests that grazing disturbance can alter the relationship between seed size and dominance for coexistent species within communities. With increasing grazing intensity, the advantages of species density, biomass, and frequency were switched from the larger-seeded species to the smaller-seeded species within the community.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 464 | 101 | 20 |
| Full Text Views | 42 | 9 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 18 | 0 | 0 |