Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Recent theoretical models of parent-offspring conflict suggest that costly solicitation by offspring reflects offspring need in a reliable manner, and that parents are, therefore, selected to increase parental effort in response to offspring solicitation. However, theory and experiments suggest that parents pay attention not only to their nestlings' needs, but also to their relative quality as reflected by size and competitive ability. A study on barn swallow nestlings, described here, investigates how such complex feeding rules affect nestling begging strategies, and how different begging strategies affect the nestlings' relative success. Begging strategies were compared for large and small brood mates, assumed to represent high and low nestling qualities, respectively. The results indicate that small nestlings tend to beg at greater intensities than large nestlings for a similar level of food deprivation. A higher intensity of begging does not, however, guarantee greater success for smaller nestlings because mass gain by nestlings is affected by both size and begging differences among the competing nestlings. I suggest that higher levels of begging by small nestlings are caused by differences in the expected benefit for a given level of begging, and create a negative correlation between the optimal level of signaling and the signaler's quality. This contrasts with the typical handicap case discussed in the literature, in which differences among individuals in the cost of signaling create a positive correlation between the optimal level of signaling and the signaler's quality. This study suggests that “negatively correlated handicaps” may emerge whenever receivers integrate cryptic information about the signaler's momentary need or motivation, based on one signal, and non-cryptic information about the signaler's quality based on other cues.
Kauf
Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):
Institutszugang
Melden Sie sich mit Open Athens, Shibboleth oder Ihren institutionellen Anmeldedaten an.
Persönliche Anmeldung
Melden Sie sich mit Ihrem brill.com-Konto an
Bengtsson H., Ryden O.Parental feeding in relation to begging behaviour in asynchronously hatched broods of the great tit Parus major Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 1983 12 243 251
Cotton P.A., Kacelnik A., Wright J.Chick begging as a signal: are nestlings honest? Behav. Ecol 1996 7 178 182
Enquist M.Communication during aggressive interactions with particular reference to variation in choice of behaviour Anim. Behav 1985 33 1152 1161
Godfray H.C.J.Signalling of need by offspring to their parents Nature 1991 352 328 330
Godfrey H.C.J.Evolutionary theory of parent-offspring conflict Nature 1995a 376 133 138
Godfray H.C.J.Signalling of need between parents and young: parent-offspring conflict and sibling rivalry Am. Nat 1995b 146 1 24
Gottlander K.Parental feeding behaviour and sibling competition in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca Ornis Scand 1987 18 269 276
Grafen A.Biological signals as handicaps J. Theor. Biol 1990 144 517 546
von Haartman L.Was reizt den trauerfliegenschnäpper (Muscicapa hypoleuca) zu füttern? Vogelwarte 1953 16 157 164
Haig D.Brood reduction and optimal parental investment when offspring differ in quality Am. Nat 1990 136 550 556
Hochachka W., Smith J.N.M.Determinants and consequences of nestling condition in song sparrows J. Anim. Ecol 1991 60 995 1008
Johnstone R.A., The evolution of animal signals. Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach., 4th ed. Krebs J.R., Davies N.B.Blackwell Oxford 1997 155 178
Kacelnik A., Cotton P.A., Stirling L., Wright J.Food allocation among nestling starlings: sibling competition and the scope of parental choice. Proc. R. Soc. London 259B: 1995 259 263
Kilner R.When do canary parents respond to nestling signals of need?*. Proc. R. Soc. London 260B: 1995 343 348
Kilner R., Johnstone A.R.Begging the question: are offspring solicitation behaviours signals of need? Trends Ecol. Evol 1997 12 11 15
Lack D.The natural regulation of animal numbers Clarendon Press Oxford 1954
Lotem A.Secondary sexual ornaments as signals: the handicap approach and three possible problems Ethologia 1993 3 209 218
Lotem A.Differences in begging behaviour among barn swallow (Hirundo rustica) nestlings Anim. Behav 1998 55 809 818
Magrath R.D.Nestling weight and juvenile survival in the blackbird (Turdus merula) J. Anim. Ecol 1991 60 335 351
McRae S.B., Weatherhead P.J., Montgomerie R.American robin nestlings compete by jockeying for position Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 1993 33 101 106
McGillivray W.B., Levenson H.Distribution of food within broods of barn swallows Willson Bull 1986 98 286 291
Mock D.W., Forbes L.S.Parent-offspring conflict: a case of arrested development Trends Ecol. Evol 1992 7 409 413
Muller R.E., Smith D.G.Parent-offspring interactions in zebra finches Auk 1978 95 485495
Nur N., Hasson O.Phenotypic plasticity and the handicap principle J. Theor. Biol 1984 110 275 297
O'Connor R.J.Brood reduction in birds: selection for fratricide, infanticide and suicide? Anim. Behav 1978 26 79 96
Parker G.A., Mock D.W., Lamey T.C.How selfish should stronger sibs be? Am. Nat 1989 133 846 868
Price K., Ydenberg R.Begging and provisioning in brood of asynchronously-hatched yellow-headed blackbird nestlings Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 1995 37 201 208
Price K., Harvey H., Ydenberg R.Begging tactics of nestling yellow-headed blackbirds, Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus, in relation to need Anim. Behav 1996 51 421 435
Redondo T., Castro F.Signalling of nutritional need by magpie nestlings Ethology 1992 92 193 204
Reynolds J.D.Should attractive individuals court more? Theory and a test. Am. Nat 1993 141 914 927
Ryden O., Bengtsson H.Differential begging and locomotory behaviour by early and late hatched nestlings affecting the distribution of food in asynchronously hatched broods of altricial birds Z. Tierpsychol 1980 53 209 224
Smith H.G., Montgomerie R.Nestling American robins compete with siblings by begging Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 1991 29 307 312
Sokal R.R., Rohlf J.F.Biometry., 2nd ed. Freeman New York 1981
Stamps J.A., Clark A., Arrowood P., Kus B.Begging behaviour in budgerigars Ethology 1989 81 177 192
Trivers R.L.Parent-offspring conflict Am. Zool 1974 14 249 264
Zahavi A.Mate selection—a selection for a handicap J. Theor. Biol 1975 53 205 214
Zahavi A.The theory of signal selection and some of its implications. In: Delfino, U.P., ed International Symposium of Biological Evolution. Bari, Adriatica Editrice 1987
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 266 | 59 | 11 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 17 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF-Downloads | 13 | 0 | 0 |
Recent theoretical models of parent-offspring conflict suggest that costly solicitation by offspring reflects offspring need in a reliable manner, and that parents are, therefore, selected to increase parental effort in response to offspring solicitation. However, theory and experiments suggest that parents pay attention not only to their nestlings' needs, but also to their relative quality as reflected by size and competitive ability. A study on barn swallow nestlings, described here, investigates how such complex feeding rules affect nestling begging strategies, and how different begging strategies affect the nestlings' relative success. Begging strategies were compared for large and small brood mates, assumed to represent high and low nestling qualities, respectively. The results indicate that small nestlings tend to beg at greater intensities than large nestlings for a similar level of food deprivation. A higher intensity of begging does not, however, guarantee greater success for smaller nestlings because mass gain by nestlings is affected by both size and begging differences among the competing nestlings. I suggest that higher levels of begging by small nestlings are caused by differences in the expected benefit for a given level of begging, and create a negative correlation between the optimal level of signaling and the signaler's quality. This contrasts with the typical handicap case discussed in the literature, in which differences among individuals in the cost of signaling create a positive correlation between the optimal level of signaling and the signaler's quality. This study suggests that “negatively correlated handicaps” may emerge whenever receivers integrate cryptic information about the signaler's momentary need or motivation, based on one signal, and non-cryptic information about the signaler's quality based on other cues.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 266 | 59 | 11 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 17 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF-Downloads | 13 | 0 | 0 |