PHYSICAL DISTANCES AMONG INDIVIDUALS IN FLOCKS OF GREATER FLAMINGOES (PHOENICOPTERUS RUBER) ARE AFFECTED BY HUMAN DISTURBANCE
In: Israel Journal of Ecology and EvolutionSearch for other papers by Reuven Yosef in
Current site
Google Scholar
Use of flock members to reduce individual levels of vigilance has been the focus of many studies that have attempted to explain the relationship among vigilance, group size, and distance covered by using foraging or preening as indicators. To avoid the confounding variables associated with foraging and preening, the effects of increasing levels of disturbance on vigilance by measuring distances among individuals (D) in flocks of greater flamingoes was studied. During 61 h, reactions to 112 disturbances were recorded. Undisturbed flamingoes exhibited no relationship between D and flock size. When joggers appeared, birds became alert but continued to feed. D was uninfluenced by flock size when jeeps drove past, but was different in value from that in undisturbed flocks. However, when tours stopped and occupants got out of their vehicles, D was significantly reduced and flock size was positively correlated with flock cohesiveness, i.e., smaller flocks had smaller D values than larger flocks. Flamingoes were terrified of all-terrain vehicles, and in 82% of these encounters, they flew away. In these cases, flock cohesiveness was extremely dense, but flock size did not influence flock reaction. This study shows that flocking species seek protection in numbers, and they leave the area when insufficient conspecifics are present when serious disturbance occurs.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Alcock J.Animal behavior., 4th ed. Sinauer SunderlandMA 1989
-
Barnard C.J.Flock feeding and time budgets in the House Sparrow (Passer domesticus) Anim. Behav 1980 28 295 309
-
Bekoff M.Vigilance, flock size, and flock geometry: information gathering by western evening grosbeaks (Aves, Fringillidae) Ethology 1995 99 150 161
-
Bildstein K.L., Frederik P.C., Spalding M.G.Feeding patterns and aggressive behavior in juvenile and adult American flamingos Condor 1991 93 916 925
-
Brown J.S.Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 1988 22 37 47
-
Brown J.S., Kotler B.P., Smith R.J., Wirtz W.O.The effects of owl predation on the foraging behavior of heteromyid rodents Oecologia 1988 76 408 415II
-
Caraco T., Martindale S., Pulliam H.R.Avian time budgets and distance to cover. Auk 1980 872 875
-
Charnov E.L.Optimal foraging: the marginal value theorem Theor. Popul. Biol 1976 9 129 136
-
Conder P.J.Individual distance Ibis 1956 91 649 655
-
Handbook of the birds of Europe the Middle East and North Africa, The birds of the Western Palearctic. Vol Cramp S.Oxford Univ. Press Oxford 1977 1Ostrich to ducks
-
Cresswell W.Flocking is an effective anti-predation strategy in Redshanks, Tringa totanus Anim. Behav 1994 47 433 442
-
Diaz J.A., Asensio B.Effects of group size and distance to protective cover on the vigilance behaviour of Black-billed Magpies, Pica pica Bird Study 1991 38 38 41
-
Elcavage P., Caraco T.Vigilance behaviour in House Sparrow flocks Anim. Behav 1983 31 303 304
-
Elgar M.A.Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence Biol. Rev 1989 64 13 33
-
Ginat K., The climate of Elat. Elat—man, sea and desert. Ariel Publ., Jerusalem Cohen M., Schiler E.1993 38 45
-
Keller V.Variations in the response of great-crested grebes Podiceps cristatus to human disturbance—a sign of adaptation? Biol. Conserv 1989 49 31 45
-
Krebs J.R., Davies N.B.An introduction to behavioural ecology Blackwell Oxford 1987
-
Lazarus J., Symonds L.Contrasting effects of protective and obstructive cover on avian vigilance Anim. Behav 1992 43 519 521
-
Poysa H.Group foraging, distance to cover and vigilance in the Teal, Anas crecca Anim. Behav 1994 48 921 928
-
Pulliam H.R.On the advantages of flocking J. Theor. Biol 1973 95 89 103
-
Pyke G.H., Pulliam H.R., Charnov E.L.Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests Q. Rev. Biol 1977 52 137 154
-
Redpath S.Vigilance levels in preening dunlins, Calidris alpina Ibis 1988 130 555 557
-
Roberts G.A real-time response of vigilance behaviour to changes in group size Anim. Behav 1995 50 1371 1374
-
Roberts G.Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases Anim. Behav 1996 51 1077 1086
-
Safriel U.Bird migration at Elat, Israel Ibis 1968 110 283 320
-
Scheel D.Watching for lions in the grass: the usefulness of scanning and its effects during hunts Anim. Behav 1993 46 695 704
-
Schmitz R.A., Baldassarree G.A.Contest asymmetry and multiple bird conflicts during foraging among nonbreeding American flamingos in Yucatan, Mexico Condor 1992 94 260 264
-
Shirahai H.The birds of Israel Academic Press London 1996
-
Sullivan K.A.The advantages of social foraging in downy woodpeckers Anim. Behav 1984 32 16 22
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 317 | 42 | 14 |
| Full Text Views | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 7 | 0 | 0 |
PHYSICAL DISTANCES AMONG INDIVIDUALS IN FLOCKS OF GREATER FLAMINGOES (PHOENICOPTERUS RUBER) ARE AFFECTED BY HUMAN DISTURBANCE
In: Israel Journal of Ecology and EvolutionSearch for other papers by Reuven Yosef in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Use of flock members to reduce individual levels of vigilance has been the focus of many studies that have attempted to explain the relationship among vigilance, group size, and distance covered by using foraging or preening as indicators. To avoid the confounding variables associated with foraging and preening, the effects of increasing levels of disturbance on vigilance by measuring distances among individuals (D) in flocks of greater flamingoes was studied. During 61 h, reactions to 112 disturbances were recorded. Undisturbed flamingoes exhibited no relationship between D and flock size. When joggers appeared, birds became alert but continued to feed. D was uninfluenced by flock size when jeeps drove past, but was different in value from that in undisturbed flocks. However, when tours stopped and occupants got out of their vehicles, D was significantly reduced and flock size was positively correlated with flock cohesiveness, i.e., smaller flocks had smaller D values than larger flocks. Flamingoes were terrified of all-terrain vehicles, and in 82% of these encounters, they flew away. In these cases, flock cohesiveness was extremely dense, but flock size did not influence flock reaction. This study shows that flocking species seek protection in numbers, and they leave the area when insufficient conspecifics are present when serious disturbance occurs.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 317 | 42 | 14 |
| Full Text Views | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 7 | 0 | 0 |
