Several life history parameters of desert and nondesert (mesic) passerines were compared for five large regions: South Africa, North Africa, southwest North America, Pakistan and northern India, and Australia. Desert and mesic passerines do not differ in their mean body mass, length of incubation and fledging periods, egg size, length of breeding seasons, and number of clutches laid per breeding season. There are certain differences in clutch size between desert and mesic passerines, and these differences are significantly related to the proportion of migrants in each region: the larger the percentage of nonbreeding species, the larger the difference in clutch size between the two forms. These results are interpreted as confirming Ashmole's hypothesis: migrants tend to spend more time in nondesert areas, where they compete with resident passerines, and cause higher mortality there in comparison to desert areas. As a result, during breeding, desert forms face stronger competition from other survivors and lay smaller clutches than nondesert forms.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Ali S., Ripley S.D.Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan Oxford University Press 1972–1974s. 6–10. Bombay
Ashmole N.P.The regulation of numbers of tropical oceanic birds Ibis 1963 103 458 473
Bennett P.M., Harvey P.H.How fecundity balances mortality in birds Nature (London) 1988 333 216
Carnaby I.C.Nesting seasons of Western Australian birds West. Aust. Nat 1954 4 149 156
Cramp S., Simmons K.E.L.Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Vol Oxford University Press Oxford 1988 5
Cramp S., Simmons K.E.L.Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Vol Oxford University Press Oxford 1992 6
Cramp S., Perrins C.M.Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Vol Oxford University Press Oxford 1993 7
Cramp S., Perrins C.M.Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Vol Oxford University Press Oxford 1994a 8
Cramp S., Perrins C.M.Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Vol Oxford University Press Oxford 1994b 9
Davies S.J.J.The breeding season of birds in south-western Australia J. R. Soc. West. Aust 1979 62 53 64
Dunning J.B.Handbook of avian body masses CRC Press London 1993Jr
Ekman J., Askenmo C.Reproductive cost, age-specific survival and a comparison of the reproductive strategies in two European tits (genus Parus) Evolution 1986 40 159 168
Ehrlich P.R., Dobkin D.S., Wheye D.The birder's handbook—a field guide to the natural history of North American birds Simon and Schuster New York 1988
Etchecopar R.D., Hüe F.The birds of North Africa Oliver and Boyd Edinburgh 1967
Harrison C.A field guide to the nests, eggs and nestlings of British and European birds with North Africa and the Middle East Collins London 1975
Harvey P.H., Mace C.M.Comparisons between taxa and adaptive trends: Problems of methodology Cambridge University Press Cambridge 1982 343 361King's College Sociobiology Group, ed
Harvey P.H., Purvis A.Comparative methods for explaining adaptations Nature (London) 1991 351 619 624
Keast A., Marshall A.J.The influence of drought and rainfall on reproduction in Australian desert birds Proc. R. Soc. London 1954 124 493 499
Klomp H.The determination of clutch size in birds: A review Ardea 1970 58 1 124
Lack D., Moreau R.E.Clutch size in tropical birds of forest and savanna Oiseau 1965 35 76 89
Maclean G.L.The breeding season of birds in the south-western Kalahari. Ostrich 8s: 1971 179 192
Maclean G.L.Robert's birds of Southern Africa. John Voelcker Bird Book Fund, Capetown 1985
van Noordwijk A.J., Keizer L.P.C., van Balen J.H., Schrloo W.Genetic variation in egg dimensions in a population of Great Tit Genetica 1981 55 221 232
Perrins C.M.Birds of Britain and Europe Collins London 1987
Perrins C.M., Birkhead T.R.Avian ecology Blackie Glasgow 1983
Pianka E.R.Evolutionary ecology Harper and Row New York 1974
Pizzey G.A field guide to the birds of Australia. Collins, Sydney 1983
Reader's Digest Complete book of Australian birds. Reader's Digest Services, Sydney 1976
Ricklefs R.E.Geographical variation in clutch size among passerine birds: Ashmole's hypothesis Auk 1980 97 38 49
Robbins C.S., Bruun B., Zim H.S.Birds of North America. Golden Press, New York 1966
Saether B.-E.Patterns of covariation between life-hisory traits of European birds Nature (London) 1988 331 616 617
Schönwetter M.Handbuch der Oölogie Akademie Verlag Berlin 1967–1983s. 14–39
Stearns S.C.The evolution of life histories Oxford University Press Oxford 1992
Terborgh J.Where have all the birds gone?* Princeton University Press PrincetonNJ 1989
Wyndham E.Length of birds' breeding seasons Am. Nat 1986 128 155 164
Yom-Tov Y.The reproductive rate of Australian passerines Aust. Wildl. J 1987 14 319 330
Yom-Tov Y.Late breeding records in some Israel desert birds Isr. J. Zool 1989 36 77 80
Yom-Tov Y.Clutch size of passerines at mid-latitudes: the possible effect of competition with migrants Ibis 1994 136 161 165
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 192 | 21 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 13 | 0 | 0 |
Several life history parameters of desert and nondesert (mesic) passerines were compared for five large regions: South Africa, North Africa, southwest North America, Pakistan and northern India, and Australia. Desert and mesic passerines do not differ in their mean body mass, length of incubation and fledging periods, egg size, length of breeding seasons, and number of clutches laid per breeding season. There are certain differences in clutch size between desert and mesic passerines, and these differences are significantly related to the proportion of migrants in each region: the larger the percentage of nonbreeding species, the larger the difference in clutch size between the two forms. These results are interpreted as confirming Ashmole's hypothesis: migrants tend to spend more time in nondesert areas, where they compete with resident passerines, and cause higher mortality there in comparison to desert areas. As a result, during breeding, desert forms face stronger competition from other survivors and lay smaller clutches than nondesert forms.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 192 | 21 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 13 | 0 | 0 |