Morphological and molecular characters for solving taxonomic problems have been employed for many years. A new method for resolving phylogenetic issues involves a synthesis of anatomical and ecological observations and can be used to predict one of three ecological parameters when the other two are known. Naturally occurring population densities of sympatric species, when carefully analyzed, can provide information on the phylogenetic relationships of these species if certain criteria are met. The major outline of this hypothesis is: (1) In a typical ecological pyramid, species which occupy a consumer trophic level coexist in a ratio (actual numbers) determined by whether they are euryphagous or stenophagous; (2) For a meaningful comparison, a pair of species must satisfy these Criteria: a) they are of the same taxonomic order; b) they are of approximately the same body size or of equal biomass; c) they are contemporaneous; and d) they are syntopic and sympatric. Examples: Heterohyrax brucei vs Procavia capensis (=P. johnstoni) in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania; Phacochoerus aethiopicus vs Kobus (=Adenota) kob thomasi in Queen Elizabeth National Park, Uganda; and Mammut americanum vs Mammuthus in the USA. The first member of each pair is phylogenetically more generalized (primitive) than the second. Hypothesis: Population densities of species are affected by habitat preferences and skeletal anatomies, especially dental structures (taphonomical considerations, for extinct species, will be discussed below). Given that the four criteria listed above hold, then, if two of three ecological parameters (relative numbers, anatomical structures, and habitats) are known, the third can be predicted. Predictions can be useful for unknown species A and species B, whose sympatric habitat (e.g., diverse forest suitable for euryphagous species) and relative numbers are known (e.g., A was found in significantly greater numbers than B)—then, it may be predicted that species A is more phylogenetically primitive than species B). At present, data are available to corroborate this hypothesis for five mammalian species-pairs; those of other vertebrate taxa (e.g., avian, and reptilian) are being studied.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Fossils in the making: vertebrate taphonomy and paleoecology Behrensmeyer A.K., Hill A.P.The University of Chicago Press Chicago and London 1980
Bothma J.du P., Order Hyracoidea. The mammals of Africa: an identification manual Meester J., Setzer H.W.Smithsonian Institution Press Washington D.C. 1971 1 8Part 12
Bown T.M.Geology and mammalian paleontology of the sand creek facies, lower Willwood Formation (lower Eocene), Washkie County, Wyoming. The Geological Survey of Wyoming, Memoire No. 2: x+151 pp., plus 1 map 1979
Corbet B.The taxonomy of Procavia capensis in Ethiopia, with special reference to the aberrant tusks of P. c. capillosa Brauer (Mammalia, Hyracoidea) British Museum of Natural History (Zoology) 1979 36 4 251 259
Czelusniak J., Goodman M., Koop B.F., Tagle D.A., Shoshani J., Braunitzer G., Kleinschmidt T.K., de Jong W.W., Matsuda G., Perspectives from amino acid and nucleotide sequences on cladistic relationships among higher taxa of Eutheria. Current mammalogy, Vol Genoways H.H.Plenum Press New York 1990 545 5722
Domning D.P., Hoeck H.N., Shoshani J., Order Hyracoidea. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Allen Press, Inc., and The Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, KS Honacki J.H., Kinman K.E., Koeppl J.W.1982 312 313
Dor M.Zoological lexicon: Vertebrata. Dvir Publishers, Tel Aviv, Israel, 2 volumes 1987
Dorst J., Dandelot P.A field guide to the larger mammals of Africa Collins London 1970
Eisenberg J.F., The density and biomass of tropical mammals. Conservation biology, an evolutionary-ecological perspective Soulé M.E., Wilcox B.A.Sinauer SunderlandMA 1980 35 55
Elton C.Animal ecology Sidgwick & Jackson 1927Ltd., London
Gentry A.W., Bovidae. Evolution of African mammals Maglio V.J., Cooke H.B.S.Harvard University Press CambridgeMA 1978 540 572
Hahn H.Die Familie der Procaviidae Zeitschrifte für Saugetierkundliche 1934 9 207 358
Hoeck H.N.Differential feeding behaviour of the sympatric hyrax Procavia johnstoni Heterohyrax brucei Oecologia 1975 22 15 47
Hoeck H.N.Systematics of the Hyracoidea: toward a classification Bulletin Carnegie Museum of Natural History, No 1978 6 146 151
Hoeck H.N.Population dynamics, dispersal and genetic isolation in two species of hyrax (Heterohyrax brucei Procavia johnstoni) on habitat islands in the Serengeti Zeitschrift für Tierphsychologie 1982 59 177 210
Hoeck H.N.Demography and competition in hyrax: a 17 year study Oecologia 1989 79 353 360
Hoeck H.N., Klein H., Hoeck P.Flexible social organization in hyrax Zeitschrift für Tierphysiologie 1982 59 265 298
Hutchinson G.E.Concluding remarks Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 1957 22 415 427
Jones C.Dendrohyrax dorsalis Mammalian Species 1978 113 1 4
Lacher T.E. Jr.The comparative social behavior of Kerodon rupestris Galea spixii and the evolution of behavior in Caviidae Bulletin of Carnegie Museum of Natural History, No 1981 17 1 71
Quaternary extinction—a prehistoric revolution Martin P.S., Klein R.G.University of Arizona Press TucsonAZ 1984
Mayr E.Principles of systematic zoology. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York 1969
McKenna M.C.Fossil Mammalia from the early Wasatchian Four Mile fauna Eocene of northwest Colorado. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences 1960 37 1 1 130
Meltzer A.Procavia capensis syriaca Schreber 1784). Ph.D. dissertation, Tel Aviv University, Israel 1973Heat balance and water economy of the rock hyrax
Mendelssohn H.Breeding the Syrian hyrax International Zoo Yearbook 1965 5 116 125
Meyer G.E., Hyracoidea. Evolution of African mammals Maglio V.J., Cooke H.B.S.Harvard University Press CambridgeMA 1978 284 314
Novacek M.J., Morphology, paleontology, and the higher clades of mammals. Current mammalogy. Vol Genoways H.H.1990 2 507 543Plenum Publishing, New York
Odum E.P., Fundamentals of ecology Saunders19713rd Philadelphia
Olds N., Shoshani J.Procavia capensis Mammalian Species 1982 171 1 7
Pianka E.R.Evolutionary ecology, 3rd ed Harper & Row New York 1983
Ricklefs R.E.Ecology. Chiron Press, Newton, MA 1973
Robinson J.G., Redford K.H.Body size, diet, and population density of Neotropical forest mammals The American Naturalist 1986 128 5 665 680
Roche J.Systematique du genre Procavia et des damans en general Mammalia 1972 36 1 22 49
Rose K.D.The Clarkforkian land-mammal age and mammalian faunal composition across the Paleocene-Eocene boundary. University of Michigan Paper on Paleontology No. 26: x+1–197 1981
Savage D.E., Russell D.E.Mammalian paleofaunas of the world Addison-Wesley Reading MA 1983
Shoshani J.Mammalian phylogeny: comparison of morphological and molecular results Molecular Biology and Evolution 1986 3 3 222 242
Shoshani J.A new hypothesis on the numbers of mastodons and mammoths in the USA Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs 1988 20 5 388
Shoshani J.A report on the Shelton Mastodon Site and a discussion on the numbers of mastodons and mammoths in Michigan Michigan Academician 1989 21 115 132
Shoshani J.A new ecological density model for mammals 1990 31CANQUA/AMQUA 1990, Programme and Abstracts, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, p
Shoshani J.University of Chicago PressIn press. On the phylogenetic relationships among Paenungulata and within Elephantidae based on immunological and osteological evidence. Evolutionary Monographs
Shoshani J.in preparation. Additional evidence for the Generalist vs. Specialist hypothesis
Shoshani J., Geron R.Field observations of living and dead elephants (including some interpretations) in Kenya, Uganda, and Zimbabwe Elephant 1986 2 2 44 68
Shotwell J.A.An approach to the paleoecology of mammals Ecology 1955 36 2 327 337
Shotwell J.A.Inter-community relationships in Hemphillian (mid-Pliocene) mammals Ecology 1958 39 2 271 282
Shotwell J.A.The Juntura Basin: studies in earth history and paleoecology Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, New Series 1963 53 1 1 77
Simpson G.G.The principles of classification and a classification of mammals Bulletin American Museum of Natural History 1945 85 1 350
Smith T.B.A double-billed dilemma. Natural History, 1/91: 14, 16 1991 18 19
Tassy P., Shoshani J., The Tethytheria: elephants and their relatives. The phylogeny and classification of the tetrapods. No. 35B, Volume 2: Mammals. The Systematics Association, London Benton M.J.1988 283 315
Vrba E.S., Evolutionary pattern and process in the sister-group Alcelaphini-Aepycerotini (Mammalia: Bovidae). Living fossils Eldredge N., Stanley S.M.Springer-Verlag New York 1984 62 79
Walker A, Hoeck H.N., Perez L.Microwear of mammalian teeth as an indicator of diet Science 1978 201 908 910
Late-Quatemary environments of the United States (2 volumes) Wright H.E. Jr.University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis 1983
The zoogeography of Israel. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht Yom-Tov Y., Tchernov E.1988
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 356 | 75 | 22 |
| Full Text Views | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Morphological and molecular characters for solving taxonomic problems have been employed for many years. A new method for resolving phylogenetic issues involves a synthesis of anatomical and ecological observations and can be used to predict one of three ecological parameters when the other two are known. Naturally occurring population densities of sympatric species, when carefully analyzed, can provide information on the phylogenetic relationships of these species if certain criteria are met. The major outline of this hypothesis is: (1) In a typical ecological pyramid, species which occupy a consumer trophic level coexist in a ratio (actual numbers) determined by whether they are euryphagous or stenophagous; (2) For a meaningful comparison, a pair of species must satisfy these Criteria: a) they are of the same taxonomic order; b) they are of approximately the same body size or of equal biomass; c) they are contemporaneous; and d) they are syntopic and sympatric. Examples: Heterohyrax brucei vs Procavia capensis (=P. johnstoni) in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania; Phacochoerus aethiopicus vs Kobus (=Adenota) kob thomasi in Queen Elizabeth National Park, Uganda; and Mammut americanum vs Mammuthus in the USA. The first member of each pair is phylogenetically more generalized (primitive) than the second. Hypothesis: Population densities of species are affected by habitat preferences and skeletal anatomies, especially dental structures (taphonomical considerations, for extinct species, will be discussed below). Given that the four criteria listed above hold, then, if two of three ecological parameters (relative numbers, anatomical structures, and habitats) are known, the third can be predicted. Predictions can be useful for unknown species A and species B, whose sympatric habitat (e.g., diverse forest suitable for euryphagous species) and relative numbers are known (e.g., A was found in significantly greater numbers than B)—then, it may be predicted that species A is more phylogenetically primitive than species B). At present, data are available to corroborate this hypothesis for five mammalian species-pairs; those of other vertebrate taxa (e.g., avian, and reptilian) are being studied.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 356 | 75 | 22 |
| Full Text Views | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 5 | 0 | 0 |