The systematics of the African pigmy mice Nannomys is studied through molecular and morphological approaches. Molecular data based on single-copy nuclear DNA (scnDNA) hybridization indicate that Nannomys is as divergent from Mus sensu stricto as is the Asian subgenus Coelomys; moreover, it shows a much closer relationship to Mus than to any other African, Oriental, or Palearctic murid genus tested so far. Furthermore, when using a molecular clock calibrated by Mus/Rattus split, estimated by paleontologists at about 10 million years ago, it appears that the separation between Nannomys and the Mus lineage occurred about 5 million years ago, a date which could indicate the earliest entry of the ancestors of Nannomys in Africa. Morphological investigations indicate that it is almost impossible to distinguish between Nannomys sp. and some similar Asian Mus species. These results suggest that Nannomys and their Oriental relatives have a common ancestor either in Africa or in Asia, or else have developed a parallel evolution, as seen in many other rodent groups.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Bonhomme F.Evolutionary relationships in the genus Mus Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 1986 127 19 34
Bonhomme F., Catalan J., Gautun J.-C., Petter F., Thaler L.Caractérisation biochimique de souris africaines référables au sous-genre Nannomys Peters, 1876 Mammalia 1982 46 110 113
Bonhomme F., Catalan J., Britton-Davidian J., Chapman V.M., Moriwaki K., Nevo E., Thaler L.Biochemical diversity and evolution in the genus Mus Biochemical Gaieties 1984 22 275 303
Brownell E.DNA/DNA hybridization studies of muroid rodents: symmetry and rates of molecular evolution Evolution 1983 37 1034 1051
Caccone A., Amato G.D., Powell J.R.Rates and patterns of scnDNA and mtDNA divergence within the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup Genetics 1988 118 671 683
Capanna E., Karyotype variability and chromosome transilience in rodents: the case of the genus Mus Luckett W.P., Hartenberger J.-L.Plenum Press New York 1985 643 669Evolutionary Relationships among Rodents
Carleton M.D., Musser G.G., Muroid rodents. Orders and Families of Recent Mammals of the World Anderson S., Jones J.K.John Wiley New York 1984 289 379pp
Catzeflis F.M., DNA hybridization as a guide to phytogenies: raw data in muroid rodents. Evolution of Subterranean Mammals at the Organismal and Molecular Levels Nevo E., Reig O.A.Wiley-Liss New York 1990 317 345
Catzeflis F.Animal tissue collections for molecular genetics and systematics Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1991 6 168
Catzeflis F.M., Sheldon F.H., Ahlquist J.E., Sibley C.G.DNA-DNA hybridization evidence of the rapid rate of muroid rodent DNA evolution Molecular Biology and Evolution 1987 4 242 253
Catzeflis F.M., Nevo E., Ahlquist J.E., Sibley C.G.Relationships of the chromosomal species in the Eurasian mole-rats of the Spalax ehrenbergi group as determined by DNA-DNA hybridization, and an estimate of the spalacid-murid divergence time Journal of Molecular Ecolution 1989 29 223 232
Ellerman J.R.The families and genera of living rodents British Museum (Natural History) London 1941
De Graaff G.A preliminary investigation into the mammalian microfauna in Pleistocene deposits of caves in the Transvaal system Paleontologia Africana 1960 7 79 118
Honacki J.H., Kinman K.E., Koeppl J.W.Mammal species of the World. The Association of Systematic Collections, Lawrence, Kansas 1982
Jacobs L.L., Flynn L.J., Downs W.R., Barry J.C., Quo vadis Antemus? Linday E.H., Fahlbusch V., Mein P.Plenum Press New York 1990 573 587The Siwalik muroid record. In: European Neogene Mammal Chronology
Jaeger J.-J., Tong H., Buffetaut E.The age and Mus-Rattus divergence: paleontological data compared with the molecular clock. Comptes Rendus Académie Sciences, Paris 302 (ser. 2): 1986 917 922
Jotterand M.Le polymorphisme chromosomique des Mus (Leggadas) africains Cytogénétique, zoogéographie, évolution. Revue Suisse Zoologie 1972 79 287 359
Jotterand-Bellomo M.Le genre Mus africain, un exemple d'homogénéité caryotypique: étude cytogénétique de Mus minutoides/musculoides (Côte d'Ivoire), de M. setulosus (République Centrafricaine), et de M. mattheyi (Burkina Faso) Cytogenetics Cell Genetics 1986 42 99 104
Marks J., Schmid C.V., Sarich V.M.DNA hybridization as a guide to phytogenies: relations of the Hominoidea Journal of Human Evolution 1988 17 769 786
Marshall J.T.A synopsis of Asian species of Mus (Rodentia, Muridae) Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 1977 158 175 220
Marshall J.T., Taxonomy. The Mouse in Biomedical Research, Vol Forster H.L., Small J.D., Fox J.G.Academic Press New York 1981 17 26I
Matthey R.Les chromosomes et la position systématique de quelques Murinae africains Acta Tropicalis 1958 2 97 117
Michaux J.Muridae (Rodentia) Néogènes d'Europe sud-occidentale Evolution et rapports avec les formes actuelles. Paléobiologie Continentale 1971 2 1 67
Miller G.S.Catalogue of the Mammals of Western Europe British Museum (Natural History) London 1912
Misonne X.African and Indo-Australian Muridae Evolutionary trends. Annales du Musee Royal d'Afrique Centrale, Tervuuren 1969 172 1 219
Musser G.G.The giant rat of Flores and its relatives east of Borneo and Bali Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 1981 169 67 176
Petter F.Contribution à la connaissance des Souris africaines Mammalia 1963 27 602 607
Pocock T.N.Plio-Pleistocene fossil mammalian microfauna of southern Africa A preliminary report including description of two new fossil muroid genera (Mammalia: Rodentia). Paleontologia Africana 1987 26 69 91
Rosevaer D.R.The rodents of West Africa British Museum (Natural History) London 1969
Sabatier M.Les rongeurs du site Pliocène à Hominidés de Hadar (Ethiopie) Paleovertebrata 1982 12 1 56
Sarich V.M., Schmid C.W., Marks J.DNA hybridization as a guide to phytogenies: a critical analysis Cladistics 1989 5 3 32
She J.-X., Bonhomme F., Boursot P., Thaler L., Catzeflis F.Molecular phytogenies in the genus Mus: comparative analysis of electrophoretic, scnDNA hybridization, and mtDNA RFLP data Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, London 1990 41 83 103
Sheldon F.H., Bledsoe A.H.Indexes to the reassociation and stability of solution DNA hybrids Journal of Molecular Evolution 1989 29 328 343
Sibley C.G., Ahlquist J.E., The phytogeny and relationships of the ratite birds as indicated by DNA-DNA hybridization. Evolution Today. Carnegie-MellonUniversity Press, Pittsburgh Scudder G.G.E., Reveal J.L.1981 301 335
Sibley C.G., Ahlquist J.E., Phytogeny and classification of birds based on the data of DNA-DNA hybridization. Current Ornithology, Vol 1 Johnston R.F.Plenum Press New York 1983 245 292
Springer M., Krajewski C.DNA hybridization in animal taxonomy: a critique from first principles Quarterly Review of Biology 1989 64 291 318
Wesselman H.B., The Omo micromammals. Contributions to Vertebrate Evolution Hecht M.K., Szalay F.S.S. Karger Basel 1984 1 219
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 206 | 31 | 2 |
| Full Text Views | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 7 | 0 | 0 |
The systematics of the African pigmy mice Nannomys is studied through molecular and morphological approaches. Molecular data based on single-copy nuclear DNA (scnDNA) hybridization indicate that Nannomys is as divergent from Mus sensu stricto as is the Asian subgenus Coelomys; moreover, it shows a much closer relationship to Mus than to any other African, Oriental, or Palearctic murid genus tested so far. Furthermore, when using a molecular clock calibrated by Mus/Rattus split, estimated by paleontologists at about 10 million years ago, it appears that the separation between Nannomys and the Mus lineage occurred about 5 million years ago, a date which could indicate the earliest entry of the ancestors of Nannomys in Africa. Morphological investigations indicate that it is almost impossible to distinguish between Nannomys sp. and some similar Asian Mus species. These results suggest that Nannomys and their Oriental relatives have a common ancestor either in Africa or in Asia, or else have developed a parallel evolution, as seen in many other rodent groups.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 206 | 31 | 2 |
| Full Text Views | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 7 | 0 | 0 |