Structural Crisis in the Circassian Sultanate during the Reign of al-Ashraf Qanisawh al-Ghawri (r. 1501â1516)
In: Iran and the CaucasusSearch for other papers by Evgeny I. Zelenev in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Milana Iliushina in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Sultan al-Ashraf Qanisawh al-Ghawri cannot be classified as an outstanding Mamluk ruler, but rather the opposite: his accession to power was a forced measure when all the more worthy claimants to the throne were unable to compete for power, so that the principle of negative selection came into play. The reign of al-Ashraf Qanisawh al-Ghawri was the final stage in the history of the Circassian Sultanate. By analysing the internal and external policies of al-Ashraf Qanisawh al-Ghawri in the early 16th century, the authors identify the key factors that caused the crisis of power of the Circassian sultans in Egypt and Syria. The Mamluk Sultanate had a system of artificial clans based on pseudo-kin who belonged to one or another community and whose members were brought up from childhood in the household of a master who, in a sense, replaced their father. This unique self-organising system provided a stable framework for the Mamluk political regime, saving it from inevitable disintegration and contributing to its renewal and even some evolution. The authors pay particular attention to the reasons for the destruction of this clan-corporation structure with its inherent balance of factional interests. The main methods of the paper are the concepts of structural and systemic crises of the state.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Ê¿Azzam, Ê¿Abd al-Wahhab (1941), Majalis al-Sultan al-Ghawri, Cairo.
-
Alhamzah, Kh. (2009), Late Mamluk Patronage: Qansuh al-Ghuriâs waqf and His Foundation in Cairo, Boca Raton.
-
Ayalon, D. (1953), âStudies of the Structure of the Mamluk ArmyâIIâ, BSOAS 15.3: 448â476.
-
Ayalon, D. (1954), âStudies of the Structure of the Mamluk ArmyâIIIâ, BSOAS 16.1: 57â90.
-
Ayalon, D. (1987), âThe End of the Mamluk Sultanate (Why did the Ottomans Spare the Mamluks of Egypt and Wipe Out the MamlÅ«ks of Syria?)â, Studia Islamica 65: 125â148.
-
Al-Bakri, Muhammad b. Abi al-Surur al-Siddiqi (1997), al-Nuzha al-Zahiyya fi Dhikr Wulat Misr wa-l-Qahira al-Muʿizziyya, Cairo.
-
Banister, M. (2015), The Abbasid Caliphate of Cairo (1261â1517): History and Tradition in the Mamluk Court, Toronto.
-
Barkan, Ãmer Lutfi (1943), XVâXVI ıncı Asırlarda Osmanlı Ä°mparatorluÄunda Ziraî Ekonominin Hukukî ve Malî Esasları, Ä°stanbul.
-
Berkey, J.P. (1998), âThe Mamluks as Muslims: The Military Elite and the Construction of Islam in Medieval Egyptâ, T. Philipp/U. Haarmann (eds.), The Mamluks in Egyptian Politics and Society, Cambridge: 163â173.
-
Bosworth, C.E. (1997), âShuraâ, The Encyclopaedia of Islam, C.E. Bosworth et al. (eds.), vol. 9, Leiden: 504â505.
-
Al-Busrawi, Ê¿Ali b. Yusuf (1988), Tarikh al-Busrawi, Damascus.
-
Coureas, N. (2013), âThe Tribute Paid to the Mamluk Sultanate, 1426â1517: the Perspective from Lusignan and Venetian Cyprusâ, Egypt and Syria in the Fatimid, Ayyubid and Mamluk eras VII. Proceedings of the 16th, 17th and 18th International Colloquium Organized at Ghent University in May 2007, 2008 and 2009, U. Vermeulen/K. Dâhulster/J. Van Steenbergen. LeuvenâParisâWalpole, MA: 363â380.
-
Couto, D. (2021), âThe Affairs of the Turks are Growing Stronglyâ: The Portuguese, the Mamluks, the Ottomans and the Indian Ocean Issues (1505â1517), 1516: The Year That Changed the Middle East and the World, Beirut: 303â349.
-
Duhman, Muhammad Ahmad (1986), Al-ʾIrak bayna al-Mamalik wa-al-ʾUthmaniyin al-Atrak maʾa Rihlat al-Amir Yashbak min Mahdi al-Dawadar li-Muhammad ibn Mahmud al-Ḥalabi al-Mulaqqib bi-Ibn Aja, Damascus.
-
Fuess, A. (2020), âThe Syro-Egyptian Sultanate in Transformation, 1496â1498: Sultan al-Nasir Muhammad b. Qaytbay and the Reformation of Mamluk Institutions and Symbols of State Powerâ, J. Van Steenbergen (ed.), Trajectories of State Formation across Fifteenth-Century Islamic West Asia, Leiden-Boston: 201â223.
-
Har-El, S. (1995), Struggle for Domination in the Middle East. The Ottoman-Mamluk War 1485â1491, Leiden-New York-Köln.
-
Hay, C. (1999), âCrisis and The Structural Transformation of The State: Interrogating the Process of Changeâ, British Journal of Politics and International Relations 1.3: 317â344.
-
Heidemann, S. (1994), Das Aleppiner Kalifat (A.D.1261), Leiden-New York-Köln.
-
Ibn al-Himsi, Ahmad b. Muhammad b. Ê¿Umar al-Ansari (2000), Hawadith al-Zaman wa-Wafayat al-Shuyukh wa-al-Aqran, Beirut.
-
Ibn Duqmaq, Ibrahim b. Muḥammad (1985), Al-Jawhar al-Thamin fi Siyar al-Muluk wa-al-Salaá¹in, Beirut.
-
Ibn Iyas, Muḥammad b. Ahmad al-Hanafi (1931â1975), Badaʾiʾ al-Zuhur fi Waqaʾiʾ al-Duhur, 6 vols., Leipzig.
-
Ibn Taghri Birdi, Jamal al-Din Abu al-Mahasin (1992), Al-Nujum al-Zahira fi Muluk Misr wa-l-Qahira, 16 vols., Beirut.
-
Ibn Tulun, Shams al-Din Muhammad ibn ʿAlī (1973), Iʾlam al-Wará bi-Man Wulliya Naʾiban min al-Atrak bi-Dimashq al-Sham al-Kubrá, 2 vols., Cairo.
-
Inalcik, H. (1995), The Ottoman Empire. The Classical Age 1300â1600, London.
-
Irwin, R. (1986), âEgypt, Syria and Their Trading Partners, 1450â1550â, R. Pinner/W.B. Denny (eds.), Carpets of the Mediterranean Countries 1400â1600, London: 73â82.
-
Al-Kawakibi, ʿAbd al-Rahman (2011), Tabaiʾ al-Istibdad wa Masariʾ al-Istiʾbad, Beirut-Cairo.
-
Lapidus, I.M. (1984), Muslim Cities in the Later Middle Ages, Cambridge.
-
Mauder, C. (2019), âChildless Rule and the Sultanâs Son: Muḥammad b. Al-GhawrÄ« and the Mamluk System of Succession in Early 16th-Century Egyptâ, T. Trausch (Hrsg.), Norm, Normabweichung und Praxis des Herrschaftsübergangs in transkultureller Perspektive, Göttingen: 161â185.
-
Mauder, C. (2021), In the Sultanâs Salon: Learning, Religion, and Rulership at the Mamluk Court of QÄniá¹£awh al-GhawrÄ« (r. 1501â1516), 2 vols., Leiden.
-
Al-Mawardi, Abu al-Hasan (1989), Al-Ahkam Al-Sultaniyah, Kuwait.
-
Meier, M.S. (1991), Osmanskaya imperiya v XVIII veke. Äerty strukturnogo krizisa, Moskva.
-
Petry, C.F. (1993), Twilight of Majesty: The Reigns of Mamlūk Sultans Al-Ashraf Qaytbay and Qansuh al-Ghawri in Egypt, Seattle.
-
Petry, C.F. (1994), Protectors or Praetorians? The Last Mamluk Sultans and Egyptâs Waning as a Great Power, Albany.
-
Petry, C.F. (2022), The Mamluk Sultanate: A History, Cambridge.
-
Petry, C.F. (1998), âThe Military Institution and Innovation in the Late MamlÅ«k Periodâ, C.F. Petry (ed.), The Cambridge History of Egypt: Islamic Egypt, 640â1517, Vol. 1, Cambridge: 462â489.
-
Al-Shirbini, al-Bayyumi Ismaʾil (1997), Musadarat al-Amlak fi al-Dawlah al-Islamiyah: ʿAsr Salatin al-Mamalik, Cairo.
-
Soudel, D. (1997), âKhalifa. The History of the Institution of the Caliphateâ, The Encyclopaedia of Islam, E. van Donzel/B. Lewis/Ch. Pellat (eds.), vol. 4, Leiden: 937â947.
-
Al-ʾUqud al-jawhariya fi al-mahasin al-dawla al-Ashrafiya al-Ghawriya, Süleymaniye Library, Istanbul, MSS Aya Sofya 3312, 3313.
-
Venzke, M.L. (2000), âThe Case of a Dulgadir-Mamluk Iqá¹ÄÊ¿: A Re-Assessment of the Dulgadir Principality and Its Position within the Ottoman-Mamluk Rivalryâ, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 43.3: 399â474.
-
Wallerstein, I. (2010), âStructural Crisesâ, New Left Review 62: 133â142.
-
Winter, M. (1992), Egyptian Society under Ottoman Rule 1517â1798, London-New York.
-
Winter, M. (1998), âThe Ottoman Occupationâ, C.F. Petry (ed.), The Cambridge History of Egypt: Islamic Egypt, 640â1517, Vol. 1, Cambridge: 490â516.
-
Zelenev, E.I./Iliushina, M. (2017), âIslamic Education and Personal Career Mobility in the Circassian Sultanate (late 14thâearly 15th century)â, Iran and Caucasus 21.3: 292â302.
-
Zelenev, E./Iliushina, M. (2024), âSuccession of Generations of the Circassian MamlÅ«ks (1496â1501) Historical Time and Factional Struggleâ, Iran and the Caucasus 28.1: 30â41.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 104 | 104 | 19 |
| Full Text Views | 7 | 7 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 28 | 28 | 0 |
Structural Crisis in the Circassian Sultanate during the Reign of al-Ashraf Qanisawh al-Ghawri (r. 1501â1516)
In: Iran and the CaucasusSearch for other papers by Evgeny I. Zelenev in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Milana Iliushina in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Sultan al-Ashraf Qanisawh al-Ghawri cannot be classified as an outstanding Mamluk ruler, but rather the opposite: his accession to power was a forced measure when all the more worthy claimants to the throne were unable to compete for power, so that the principle of negative selection came into play. The reign of al-Ashraf Qanisawh al-Ghawri was the final stage in the history of the Circassian Sultanate. By analysing the internal and external policies of al-Ashraf Qanisawh al-Ghawri in the early 16th century, the authors identify the key factors that caused the crisis of power of the Circassian sultans in Egypt and Syria. The Mamluk Sultanate had a system of artificial clans based on pseudo-kin who belonged to one or another community and whose members were brought up from childhood in the household of a master who, in a sense, replaced their father. This unique self-organising system provided a stable framework for the Mamluk political regime, saving it from inevitable disintegration and contributing to its renewal and even some evolution. The authors pay particular attention to the reasons for the destruction of this clan-corporation structure with its inherent balance of factional interests. The main methods of the paper are the concepts of structural and systemic crises of the state.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 104 | 104 | 19 |
| Full Text Views | 7 | 7 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 28 | 28 | 0 |
