Sextus Empiricus on the True and the Lekton
In: History of Philosophy & Logical AnalysisSearch for other papers by James Allen in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Apart from the section of book VII that Diogenes Laertius dedicates to Stoic logic, Sextus Empiricus’ treatment of the true, Adversus Mathematicos VIII 1–140, is the most extensive and important repository of testimonies about the Stoics’ theory of the lekton or sayable that has come down to us. Unlike Diogenes Laertius’, Sextus’ treatment is highly polemical. Fragments of Stoic theory are embedded in a context adapted to the needs of Pyrrhonian scepticism. To serve these purposes, Sextus imposes a framework on the views that he tackles which classifies them in terms of the questions he takes to be in dispute. The object of this essay is to assess Sextus’ performance as an expositor and critic of the Stoic theory. It argues that Sextus’ account was assembled out of originally separate and sometimes disparate pieces, and it detects a number of mis-matches between Sextus’ framework and his arguments, on the one hand, and the material to which they are applied, on the other. It concludes by recommending that readers approach Sextus’ evidence with caution.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Die Fragmente zur Dialektik der Stoiker. Hülser, K. (ed.), 1987–1988. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog. (= FDS)
-
Epicurea, Usener, H. (ed.), 1887. Leipzig: Teubner.
-
Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta. Arnim, J. von (ed.), 1903–1905. Leipzig: Teubner. (= SVF)
-
Sextus Empiricus. Opera. Mutschmann, H. & Mau, J. (eds.), 1914–1958 (3 vols); vol. IV: Indices, Janacek, K. 1962. Leipzig: Teubner.
-
Sextus Empiricus. Bury, R. G. (tr.), 1933–1949 (4 vols). London/Cambridge Mass.: Heinemann: Harvard University Press.
-
Sextus Empiricus. Against the Logicians. Bett, R. (tr.), 2005. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
The Hellenistic Philosophers. Long, A. & Sedley, D. (ed., tr.), 1987. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (= LS)
-
Alessandrelli, M. 2013. Il Problema del Lekton nello Stoicismo Antico. Florence: Leo S. Olschki Editore.
-
Atherton, C. 1993. The Stoics on Ambiguity. Cambridge: Cambribge University Press.
-
Brehier, E. 1928. La Théorie des incorporels dans l’ancien Stoïcisme. Paris: Vrin.
-
Bronowski, A. 2019. The Stoics on Lekta: All there is to say. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Brunschwig, J. 1984. Remarques sur la thëorie stoïcienne du nom propre, Histoire Epistémologie Langage 6, 3–19. Repr. in English trans. as ‘Remarks on the Stoic theory of the proper noun’ in Brunschwig 1994. Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 39–56. Cited from English trans.
-
Crivelli, P. 1994. Indefinite Propositions and Anaphora in Stoic Logic, Phronesis 39, 187–207.
-
Durand, M. 2019. What does “This” mean? Deixis and the Semantics of Demonstratives in Stoic Propositions, Methodos, 1–26.
-
Frede, M. 1993. The Stoic Notion of a lekton. In: Everson, S. (ed.), Language: Compantions to Ancient Thought 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 109–128.
-
Glucker, J. 1994. The Origin of ὙΠΑΡΧΩ and ὙΠΑΡΞΙΣ as Philosophical Terms. In: Romano, F. & Taormina, D. P. (eds.), HYPARXIS e HYPOSTASIS nel Neoplatonismo. Florence, 1–23.
-
Goldschmidt, V. 1972.
ὙΠΆΡΧΕΙΝ et῾ΘΦΙΣΤΆΝΑΙ ΥΦΙΣΤΆΝΑΙ dans la Philosophie Stoïcienne, Revue des Études Grecques 85, 331–344. -
Gourinat, J.-B. 2000. La dialectique des stoïciens. Paris: Vrin.
-
Hadot, P. 1969. Zur Vorgeschichte des Begriffs „Existenz“, ὙΠΆΡΧΕΙΝ bei den Stoikern, Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 13, 115–127.
-
Heintz, W. 1932. Studien zu Sextus Empiricus. Halle: Niemeyer.
-
Kneale, W. & Kneale, M. 1962. The Development of Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Mates, B. 1953. Stoic Logic. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Prantl, C. G. 1855. Geschichte der Logik in Abendlande. Leipzig: Hirzel.
-
Schmidt, R. 1839. Stoicorum Grammatica. Halle: Eduard Anton.
-
Schubert, A. 1994. Untersuchungen zur stoischen Bedeutungslehre. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
-
Steinthal, H. 1890–1891. Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft bei den Griechen und Römern mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die Logik. Leipzig: F. Dummler.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 261 | 261 | 15 |
| Full Text Views | 17 | 17 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 40 | 40 | 4 |
Sextus Empiricus on the True and the Lekton
In: History of Philosophy & Logical AnalysisSearch for other papers by James Allen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Apart from the section of book VII that Diogenes Laertius dedicates to Stoic logic, Sextus Empiricus’ treatment of the true, Adversus Mathematicos VIII 1–140, is the most extensive and important repository of testimonies about the Stoics’ theory of the lekton or sayable that has come down to us. Unlike Diogenes Laertius’, Sextus’ treatment is highly polemical. Fragments of Stoic theory are embedded in a context adapted to the needs of Pyrrhonian scepticism. To serve these purposes, Sextus imposes a framework on the views that he tackles which classifies them in terms of the questions he takes to be in dispute. The object of this essay is to assess Sextus’ performance as an expositor and critic of the Stoic theory. It argues that Sextus’ account was assembled out of originally separate and sometimes disparate pieces, and it detects a number of mis-matches between Sextus’ framework and his arguments, on the one hand, and the material to which they are applied, on the other. It concludes by recommending that readers approach Sextus’ evidence with caution.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 261 | 261 | 15 |
| Full Text Views | 17 | 17 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 40 | 40 | 4 |
