In The Quantity of the Soul, Augustine puts forward the view that the soul is immaterial and that its quantity (quantitas) must be understood in terms of power rather than spatial extension. Against this view, his friend and interlocutor Evodius raises an important objection, The Objection from Touch, which argues that the soulâs exercise of tactile sensation requires that it be extended through the parts of the body. This paper examines Evodiusâs objection and Augustineâs response to it. Particular attention is given to certain features of Augustineâs theory of sensation that this exchange reveals, especially his view that the eyes undergo passion-at-a-distance or are acted on at a place where they are not present.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
De an. Alexander of Aphrodisias. Supplement to On the Soul. Sharples, R.W. (tr.). 2004. London: Duckworth.
Conf. Augustinus. Confessiones libri XIII (CCSL 27). Verheijen, L. (ed.). 1981. Turnhout: Brepolis.
C. ep. Man. Augustinus. 1.189 Contra epistulam fundamenti (CSEL 25/1). Zycha, J. (ed.). 1891. Vienna: F. Tempsky.
De Gen. ad litt. Augustinus. De Genesi ad litteram (CSEL 28/1). Zycha, J. (ed.). 1894. Vienna: F. Tempsky.
De immort. an. Augustinus. De immortalitate animae (CSEL 89). Hörmann, W. (ed.). 1986. Vienna: Hoelder-Pichler-Tempsky.
De lib. arb. Augustinus. De libero arbitrio (CCSL 29). Green, W.M. (ed.). 1970. Turnhout: Brepolis.
De quant. an. Augustinus. De quantitate animae (CSEL 89). Hörmann, W. (ed.). 1986. Vienna: Hoelder-Pichler-Tempsky.
De mus. Augustinus. De musica (CSEL 102). Jacobsson, M. (ed.). 2017. Berlin: De Gruyter.
De Trin. Augustinus. De Trinitate libri XV (CCSL 50A). Mountain, W.J. & Glorie, F. (eds.). 1968. Turnhout: Brepolis.
Ep. Augustinus. Epistulae (ep. 124â184A) (CSEL 44). Goldbacher, A. (ed.). 1904. Vienna: F. Tempsky.
Serm. Augustinus. Sermones (PL 38). Migne, J.-P. (ed.). 1865. Paris: Imprimerie Catholique.
Enn. Plotinus. Ennead IV. Armstrong, A.H. (tr.). 1984. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sent. Porphyre. Sentences, 2 vol.s Brisson, L. et al. (eds.). 2005. Paris: Librarie Philosophique J. Vrin.
Brittain, C. 2002. Non-Rational Perception in the Stoics and Augustine. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 22, 253â308.
Gannon, M. 1956. The Active Theory of Sensation in St. Augustine. The New Scholasticism 30, 154â180.
Gilson, Ã. 1929. Introduction à lâétude de Saint Augustin. Paris: J. Vrin.
Hölscher, L. 1986. The Reality of the Mind: Augustineâs Philosophical Arguments for the Human Soul as a Spiritual Substance. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Kalderon, M. Perception and Extramission in De quantitate animae. (unpublished)
LagouaneÌre, J. 2018. AÌme, corps et conscience de soi dans le De quantitate animae dâAugustin. Augustiniana 68(2), 229â256.
Lindberg, D. 1976. Theories of Vision from al-Kindi to Kepler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Markus, R.A. 1967. Augustine: Sense and Imagination. In: Armstrong, A.H. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miles, M.R. 1979. Augustine on the Body. Ann Arbor: Scholars Press.
Nash, R.H. 1969. The Light of the Mind: St. Augustineâs Theory of Knowledge. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
OâConnell, R.J. 1968. St. Augustineâs Early Theory of Man, A.D. 386â389. Boston: Harvard University Press.
OâDaly, G.J. 1987. Augustineâs Philosophy of Mind. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Pépin, J. 1964. Une nouvelle source de Saint Augustin: le ζήÏηµα de Porphyre. Sur lâunion de lââme et du corps. Revue des Ãtudes Anciennes 66(1â2), 53â107.
Silva, J. 2014. Augustine on Active Perception. In: Silva, J.F. & Yrjönsuuri, M. (eds.), Active Perception in the History of Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 418 | 124 | 5 |
| Full Text Views | 37 | 7 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 69 | 16 | 0 |
In The Quantity of the Soul, Augustine puts forward the view that the soul is immaterial and that its quantity (quantitas) must be understood in terms of power rather than spatial extension. Against this view, his friend and interlocutor Evodius raises an important objection, The Objection from Touch, which argues that the soulâs exercise of tactile sensation requires that it be extended through the parts of the body. This paper examines Evodiusâs objection and Augustineâs response to it. Particular attention is given to certain features of Augustineâs theory of sensation that this exchange reveals, especially his view that the eyes undergo passion-at-a-distance or are acted on at a place where they are not present.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 418 | 124 | 5 |
| Full Text Views | 37 | 7 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 69 | 16 | 0 |