Save

Contemporary Social Contract Theory and Hegel’s Master/Bondsman-Relation

In: History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis
Author:
Arthur Kok Tilburg

Search for other papers by Arthur Kok in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€36.93

This contribution investigates whether Hegel’s critique of social contract theory is still applicable to contemporary contract theory proposed by, e. g., Rawls and Nozick. At first sight, they seem to have overcome the problems identified by Hegel because Rawls and Nozick appropriate the social contract as something essentially rational and normative (though in different ways). I argue, however, that for Hegel, their appeal to rational argumentation is not compatible with the concreteness of human individuals. A revised reading of the master/ bondsman-relation, emphasizing the role of the “fear of death”, shows the limited scope of contemporary contract theory.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 403 85 16
Full Text Views 30 5 0
PDF Views & Downloads 50 10 0