Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Labour Relations and Relational Labour: Care, Ontology and Social Reproduction
in Historical MaterialismSearch for other papers by Paddy Gordon in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
As the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated capital’s inherent carelessness, notions of ‘care’ continue to underpin political struggles and invigorate the Marxist tradition. This article examines how we might conceive of care and the labour of care – carework – in a present defined by intersecting economic, ecological and epidemiological crises. What might a historical-materialist concept of care reveal about contemporary capitalism? Does such a concept have any emancipatory potential?
Care or the absence of care suffuses the myriad labour-processes that make ourselves and our world. Recognising the ‘dual nature of care as relation and labour’ is politically and theoretically imperative. How broad care’s remit is, and how and where it intersects (or does not intersect) with Marxist theory and practice, are vital contemporary debates within the historical-materialist tradition. This article argues that just as social-reproduction theory represents a necessary extension of historical materialism, ‘care’ likewise represents a necessary extension of social-reproduction theory, an extension that also addresses theoretical gaps within Marxism.
Contemporary social-reproduction theory involves ‘decentring housework … and foregrounding the contradictions posed to capital by the reproduction of life’. In this article, I will argue that the very root of life’s reproduction is care. More than merely a means of decentring housework, care is both the ontological ground of human relationality and ground zero for radical action and thought.
Kauf
Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):
Institutszugang
Melden Sie sich mit Open Athens, Shibboleth oder Ihren institutionellen Anmeldedaten an.
Persönliche Anmeldung
Melden Sie sich mit Ihrem brill.com-Konto an
-
Bakker, Isabella 2007, ‘Social Reproduction and the Constitution of a Gendered Political Economy’, New Political Economy, 12, 4: 541–556.
-
Barrett, Michelle and Mary McIntosh 2015 [1982], The Anti-Social Family, London: Verso.
-
Bhattacharya, Tithi 2017, ‘How Not to Skip Class: Social Reproduction of Labor and the Global Working Class’, in Social Reproduction Theory: Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression, edited by Tithi Bhattacharya, London: Pluto Press.
-
Boris, Eileen 2015, ‘Production, Reproduction and the Problem of Home for Work’, Viewpoint Magazine, 31 October, available at: <https://viewpointmag.com/2015/10/31/production-reproduction-and-the-problem-of-home-for-work/>.
-
Braidotti, Rosi 2017, ‘Generative Futures: On Affirmative Ethics’, in Critical and Clinical Cartographies: Architecture, Robotics, Medicine, Philosophy, edited by Andrej Radman and Heidi Sohn, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
-
Butler, Judith 2020, The Force of Nonviolence: An Ethico-Political Bind, London: Verso.
-
Cammack, Paul 2020, ‘Marx on Social Reproduction’, Historical Materialism, 28, 2: 76–106.
-
Chatzidakis, Andreas, Jamie Hakim, Jo Littler, Catherine Rottenberg and Lynne Segal 2020, The Care Manifesto: The Politics of Interdependence, London: Verso.
-
Cooper, Melinda 2017, Family Values: Between Neoliberalism and the New Social Conservatism, New York: Zone Books.
-
Curcio, Anna and Kathi Weeks 2015, ‘Social Reproduction, Neoliberal Crisis, and the Problem with Work: A Conversation with Kathi Weeks’, Viewpoint Magazine, 30 October, available at: <https://viewpointmag.com/2015/10/31/social-reproduction-neoliberal-crisis-and-the-problem-with-work-a-conversation-with-kathi-weeks/>.
-
Dalla Costa, Mariarosa and Selma James 1997 [1975], ‘Women and the Subversion of the Community’, in Materialist Feminism: A Reader in Class, Difference, and Women’s Lives, edited by Rosemary Hennessy and Chrys Ingraham, New York: Routledge.
-
Davis, Angela Y. 2019 [1981], Women, Race and Class, London: Penguin Books.
-
de la Bellacasa, María Puig 2012, ‘“Nothing Comes Without Its World”: Thinking with Care’, The Sociological Review, 60, 2: 197–216.
-
Deleuze, Gilles and Félix Guattari 2009 [1972], Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, translated by Robert Hurley, Mark Seem and Helen R. Lane. New York: Penguin Books.
-
Dowling, Emma 2021, The Care Crisis: What Caused It and How Can We End It?, London: Verso.
-
Elson, Diane 2015 [1979], Value: The Representation of Labour in Capitalism, London: Verso.
-
Federici, Silvia 2012 [2004], Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction, and Feminist Struggle, Oakland, CA: PM Press/Autonomedia.
-
Federici, Silvia 2019, ‘Social Reproduction Theory’, Radical Philosophy, II, 4: 55–57.
-
Ferguson, Susan 2016, ‘Intersectionality and Social-Reproduction Feminisms: Toward an Integrative Ontology’, Historical Materialism, 24, 2: 38–60.
-
Ferguson, Susan 2020, Women and Work: Feminism, Labour, and Social Reproduction, London: Pluto Press.
-
Ferguson, Susan and David McNally 2013, ‘Capital, Labour-Power, and Gender- Relations: Introduction to the Historical Materialism Edition of Marxism and the Oppression of Women’, in Lise Vogel, Marxism and the Oppression of Women, Historical Materialism Book Series, Chicago: Haymarket Books.
-
Firestone, Shulamith 2015 [1970], The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution, London: Verso.
-
Folbre, Nancy 2021, The Rise and Decline of Patriarchal Systems: An Intersectional Political Economy, London: Verso.
-
Foucault, Michel 1994 [1966], The Order of Things, New York: Vintage.
-
Fraser, Nancy 2016, ‘Contradictions of Capital and Care’, New Left Review, II, 100: 99–117.
-
Gimenez, Martha 2019, Marx, Women, and Capitalist Social Reproduction: Marxist -Feminist Essays, Historical Materialism Book Series, Chicago: Haymarket Books.
-
Gotby, Alva 2023, They Call it Love, London: Verso.
-
Gramsci, Antonio 1999, An Antonio Gramsci Reader: Selected Writings, 1916–1935, edited by David Forgacs, London: Lawrence and Wishart Limited.
-
Groys, Boris 2022, Philosophy of Care, London: Verso.
-
Hägglund, Martin 2019, This Life: Why Mortality Makes Us Free, London: Profile Books.
-
Hall, Stuart 2011, ‘The Neo-Liberal Revolution’, Cultural Studies, 25, 6: 705–728.
-
Harvey, David 2018, The Limits to Capital, London: Verso.
-
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 2003 [1807], The Phenomenology of Mind, translated by J.B. Baillie, New York: Dover.
-
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 2015 [1816], The Science of Logic, edited and translated by George Di Giovanni, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Hochschild, Arlie 1979, ‘Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure’, American Journal of Sociology, 85, 3: 551–575.
-
Jameson, Fredric 2015, The Antinomies of Realism, London: Verso.
-
Jones, Phil 2021, Work Without the Worker: Labour in the Age of Platform Capitalism, London: Verso.
-
Laslett, Barbara and Johanna Brenner 1989, ‘Gender and Social Reproduction: Historical Perspectives’, Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 1: 381–404.
-
Lewis, Sophie 2021, Full Surrogacy Now: Feminism Against Family, London: Verso.
-
Mandel, Ernest 1976, ‘Introduction’, in Karl Marx, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume One, translated by Ben Fowkes, London: Penguin Books.
-
Mandel, Ernest 2015 [1967], The Formation of the Economic Thought of Karl Marx, 1843 to Capital, London: Verso.
-
Marx, Karl 1913 [1885], Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume II: The Process of Circulation of Capital, edited by Friedrich Engels and translated by Ernest Unterman, Chicago: Charles H. Kerr & Company.
-
Marx, Karl 1963, Early Writings, edited by Tom Bottomore, London: C.A. Watts & Co.
-
Mark, Karl 1990 [1867], Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume One, translated by Ben Fowkes, London: Penguin.
-
Marx, Karl 2005 [1939], Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy, translated by Martin Nicolaus, London: Penguin.
-
Marx, Karl 2013 [1867], Capital, translated by Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling, Ware: Wordsworth Editions Ltd.
-
Marx, Karl 2023 [1891], Critique of the Gotha Program, Oakland, CA: Spectre.
-
Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels 1998 [1932], The German Ideology, New York: Prometheus Books.
-
Matar, Anat 2022, The Poverty of Ethics, London: Verso.
-
Mezzadri, Alessandra 2019, ‘On the Value of Social Reproduction: Informal Labour, the Majority World and the Need for Inclusive Theories and Politics’, Radical Philosophy, II, 4: 33–41.
-
Mies, Maria 2014 [1986], Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour, London: Zed Books.
-
Munro, Kristin 2019, ‘Social Reproduction Theory, Social Reproduction, and Household Production’, Science & Society, 83, 4: 451–468.
-
Ng, Karen 2021, ‘Humanism’, Philosophical Topics, 49, 1: 145–164.
-
O’Brien, M.E. 2022, Family Abolition: Capitalism and the Communizing of Care, London: Pluto Press.
-
Oksala, Joanna 2016, ‘Affective Labor and Feminist Politics’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 41, 2: 281–303.
-
Postone, Moishe 2006 [1993], Time, Labor, and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Critical Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Tronto, Joan 2020, Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care, London: Routledge.
-
Varela, Paula 2021, ‘Social Reproduction in Dispute: A Debate Between Autonomists and Marxists’, Spectre: A Marxist Journal, 10 December, available at: <https://spectrejournal.com/social-reproduction-in-dispute/>.
-
Vogel, Lise 2013 [1983], Marxism and the Oppression of Women: Toward a Unitary Theory, Historical Materialism Book Series, Chicago: Haymarket Books.
-
Walsh, Joanna 2022, Girl Online: A User Manual, London: Verso.
-
Weeks, Kathi 2007, ‘Life Within and Against Work: Affective Labor, Feminist Critique, and Post-Fordist Politics’, Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 7, 1: 233–249.
-
Weeks, Kathi 2017, ‘Down With Love: Feminist Critique and the New Ideologies of Work’, Women’s Studies Quarterly, 45, 3/4: 37–58.
-
Weeks, Kathi 2018 [1998], Constituting Feminist Subjects, London: Verso.
-
Winders, Jamie and Barbara Smith 2018, ‘Social Reproduction and Capitalist Production: A Genealogy of Dominant Imaginaries’, Progress in Human Geography, 43: 1–19.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 817 | 817 | 88 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 54 | 54 | 3 |
| PDF-Downloads | 138 | 138 | 13 |
Labour Relations and Relational Labour: Care, Ontology and Social Reproduction
in Historical MaterialismSearch for other papers by Paddy Gordon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
As the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated capital’s inherent carelessness, notions of ‘care’ continue to underpin political struggles and invigorate the Marxist tradition. This article examines how we might conceive of care and the labour of care – carework – in a present defined by intersecting economic, ecological and epidemiological crises. What might a historical-materialist concept of care reveal about contemporary capitalism? Does such a concept have any emancipatory potential?
Care or the absence of care suffuses the myriad labour-processes that make ourselves and our world. Recognising the ‘dual nature of care as relation and labour’ is politically and theoretically imperative. How broad care’s remit is, and how and where it intersects (or does not intersect) with Marxist theory and practice, are vital contemporary debates within the historical-materialist tradition. This article argues that just as social-reproduction theory represents a necessary extension of historical materialism, ‘care’ likewise represents a necessary extension of social-reproduction theory, an extension that also addresses theoretical gaps within Marxism.
Contemporary social-reproduction theory involves ‘decentring housework … and foregrounding the contradictions posed to capital by the reproduction of life’. In this article, I will argue that the very root of life’s reproduction is care. More than merely a means of decentring housework, care is both the ontological ground of human relationality and ground zero for radical action and thought.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 817 | 817 | 88 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 54 | 54 | 3 |
| PDF-Downloads | 138 | 138 | 13 |
