Being and Nothingness argues that in the masterâslave dialectic Hegel had a âbrilliant insightâ contra solipsism, to the effect that each self-consciousness depends on other consciousnesses. Against Hegel, however, Sartre claims that the separation of the for-itself remains an insurmountable âscandalâ and that collectivity can at best exist as a âde-totalised totalityâ, never as Subject. In a confrontation with Hegelian Sittlichkeit, Notebooks for an Ethics extends this analysis to the historical modalities of the mutual recognition of freedoms. A âconcrete ethicsâ must be ârevolutionary socialistâ, centrally concerned with âthe dialectic of the ends and means of revolutionâ. Finally, Sartreâs analysis of the dialectic of society and the state in the Critique of Dialectical Reason explains why sovereignty can never be the embodiment of an imaginary Subject. Sartre thus ultimately occupies a highly distinctive middle ground between Hegelâs Philosophy of Right and Marxâs critique of Hegel. A fulcrum of the argument, focused on Notebooks for an Ethics, consists in a comparison between Sartre and Trotskyâs Their Morals and Ours.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Barot, Emmanuel 2011a, Marx au pays des soviets ou les deux visages du communisme, Montreuil: La Ville Brûle.
Barot, Emmanuel (ed.) 2011, Sartre et le marxisme, Paris: La Dispute.
Basso, Lelio 2016, Inventare il nuovo. Storia e politica in Jean-Paul Sartre, Verona: Ombre Corte.
Bensaïd, Daniel 2010 [1991], Walter Benjamin, sentinelle messianique: à la gauche du possible, Paris: Les Prairies Ordinaires.
Birchall, Ian H. 2004, Sartre against Stalinism, New York: Berghahn Books.
Birchall, Ian H. 2011, âSartre, Trotsky et le trotskysmeâ, in Barot (ed.) 2011, pp. 61â79.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1991 [1820], Elements of the Philosophy of Right, edited by Allen W. Wood, translated by H.B. Nisbet, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 2009 [1822â1823], La Philosophie de lâhistoire, edited by Myriam Bienenstock, Paris: Librairie Générale Française.
Marcuse, Herbert 1972 [1948], âSartreâs Existentialismâ, in From Luther to Popper: Studies in Critical Philosophy, translated by Joris de Bres, London: New Left Books.
Marcuse, Herbert 1990 [1932], Hegelâs Ontology and the Theory of Historicity, translated by Seyla Benhabib, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Marx, Karl 1975 [1927], âContribution to the Critique of Hegelâs Philosophy of Lawâ, in Marx/Engels Collected Works, Volume 3, Marx/Engels 1844â45, London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Sartre, Jean-Paul 1960 [1957], Questions de méthode, in Critique de la raison dialectique, Volume 1, Paris: Ãditions Gallimard.
Sartre, Jean-Paul 1976 [1960], Critique of Dialectical Reason, Volume 1, translated by Alan Sheridan-Smith, edited by Jonathan Rée, London: New Left Books.
Sartre, Jean-Paul 1992 [1983], Notebooks for an Ethics, translated by David Pellauer, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Sartre, Jean-Paul 1993 [1947], âAller et retourâ, in Critiques littéraires (Situations I), Paris: Ãditions Gallimard.
Sartre, Jean-Paul 2000 [1938], Nausea, translated by Robert Baldick, London: Penguin.
Sartre, Jean-Paul 2005, âMorale et histoireâ, Les Temps modernes, 632, 633 & 634.
Sartre, Jean-Paul 2016a [2013], What Is Subjectivity?, translated by David Broder and Trista Selous, London: Verso.
Sartre, Jean-Paul 2016b, âLes racines de lâéthiqueâ, Ãtudes sartriennes, 19: 11â18.
Sartre, Jean-Paul 2018 [1943], Being and Nothingness: An Essay in Phenomenological Ontology, translated by Sarah Richmond, London: Routledge.
Trotsky, Leon 1970 [1936], The Third International after Lenin, translated by John G. Wright, New York: Pathfinder Press.
Trotsky, Leon 2011 [1973], Their Morals and Ours: The Class Foundations of Moral Practice, New York: Pathfinder Press.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 1253 | 295 | 26 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 80 | 11 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 211 | 32 | 0 |
Being and Nothingness argues that in the masterâslave dialectic Hegel had a âbrilliant insightâ contra solipsism, to the effect that each self-consciousness depends on other consciousnesses. Against Hegel, however, Sartre claims that the separation of the for-itself remains an insurmountable âscandalâ and that collectivity can at best exist as a âde-totalised totalityâ, never as Subject. In a confrontation with Hegelian Sittlichkeit, Notebooks for an Ethics extends this analysis to the historical modalities of the mutual recognition of freedoms. A âconcrete ethicsâ must be ârevolutionary socialistâ, centrally concerned with âthe dialectic of the ends and means of revolutionâ. Finally, Sartreâs analysis of the dialectic of society and the state in the Critique of Dialectical Reason explains why sovereignty can never be the embodiment of an imaginary Subject. Sartre thus ultimately occupies a highly distinctive middle ground between Hegelâs Philosophy of Right and Marxâs critique of Hegel. A fulcrum of the argument, focused on Notebooks for an Ethics, consists in a comparison between Sartre and Trotskyâs Their Morals and Ours.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 1253 | 295 | 26 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 80 | 11 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 211 | 32 | 0 |