Resistance to sustainable development policies in authoritarian contexts is a global phenomenon. In Vietnam, the state tries to prevent resistance using repressive-responsive measures and instrumentalises the sustainable development discourse under its ecological modernisation program to frame the measures. NGO s and communities may only participate in governance processes within boundaries and narratives defined by the Vietnamese state. The sustainable development paradigm as a norm is therefore omni-present. Still, resistance to the state’s definition of sustainable development exists. This article illustrates how a farming community resists the narrative and shows how a Vietnamese NGO mediates the community’s covert everyday resistance to overt forms and rightful resistance. It achieves case-based successes by making paradoxes between different discourses productive. This article contributes to understanding the role of the sustainable development discourse in Vietnam and argues that resistance is actually taking place despite a widespread will to be modern. It adds to the literature on resistance by enabling an in-depth look into the process of mediation between different forms of resistance.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Arantes, Virginie. 2023. China’s Green Consensus: Participation, Co-Optation and Legitimation. London: Routledge.
Behrens, Julia. 2022. “The Power of Sustainable Development: Environmental Narratives and Power Structures in NGO work in Vietnam.” PhD diss., Humboldt University Berlin.
Bernstein, Steven. 2005. “Globalization and the Requirements of ‘Good’ Environmental Governance.” Perspectives on Global Development and Technology 4 (3–4): 645–679.
Brand, Ulrich, and Mark Wissen. 2017. “Social-ecological transformation.” In The International Encyclopedia of Geography, edited by Douglas Richardson, Noel Castree, Michael F. Goodchild, Audrey Kobayashi, Weidong Liu, and Richard A. Marston. Hoboken: Wiley Publishing.
Bui, Thiem Hai. 2013. “The Development of Civil Society and Dynamics of Governance in Vietnam’s One Party Rule.” Global Change, Peace & Security 25 (1): 77–93.
Doherty, Brian, and Timothy Doyle. 2018. “Friends of the Earth International: Agonistic Politics, Modus Vivendi and Political Change.” Environmental Politics 27 (6): 1057–1078.
Fan, Mei-Fang, Chih-Ming Chiu, and Leslie Mabon. 2022. “Environmental Justice and the Politics of Pollution: The Case of the Formosa Ha Tinh Steel Pollution Incident in Vietnam.” Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 5 (1): 189–206.
Ferguson, James. 2005. “Anthropology and Its Evil Twin: Development in the Constitution of a Discipline.” In The Anthropology of Development and Globalization, edited by Marc Edelman and Angellique Haugerud, pp. 140–154. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Fortier, Francois. 2010. “Taking a Climate Chance: A Procedural Critique of Vietnam’s Climate Change Strategy.” Asia Pacific Viewpoint 51 (3): 229–247.
Foucault, Michel. 2007 [1978]. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College De France, 1977–1978. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Hajer, Maarten A. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Harms, Erik. 2014. “Civility’s Footprint: Ethnographic Conversations about Urban Civility in Ho Chi Minh City.” Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 29 (2): 223–262.
Harms, Erik. 2016. Luxury and Rubble: Civility and Dispossession in the New Saigon. Oakland, California: University of California Press.
Johansson, Anna, and Stellan Vinthagen. 2020. Conceptualizing ‘Everyday Resistance’: A Transdisciplinary Approach. New York: Routledge
Kerkvliet, Benedict J. 2005. The Power of Everyday Politics: How Vietnamese Peasants Transformed National Policy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Kerkvliet, Benedict J. 2019. Speaking Out in Vietnam: Public Political Criticism in a Communist Party-Ruled Nation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Krueger, Timmo. 2014. “Das Hegemonieprojekt der oekologischen Modernisierung und antagonistische Artikulationen in der internationalen Klimapolitik” [The Hegemony Project of the Ecological Modernisation and Antagonistic Articulation in International Climate Politics]. In Oekologische Modernisierung: Zur Geschichte und Gegenwart eines Konzepts in Umweltpolitik und Sozialwissenschaften [Ecological Modernisation: On the History and Present of a Concept in Environmental Politics and Social Science], edited by Martin Bemmann, Birgit Metzger and Roderich von Detten, pp. 97–126. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
Li, Tania Murray. 2007. The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
Lilja, Mona, Mikael Baaz, Michael Schulz and Stellan Vinthagen. 2017. “How Resistance Encourages Resistance: Theorizing the Nexus Between Power, ‘Organized Resistance’ and ‘Everyday Resistance’.” Journal of Political Power 10(1): 40–54.
Lundberg, Mats. 2004. “Kinh Settlers in Viet Nam’s Northern Highlands: Natural Resources Management in a Cultural Context.” PhD Thesis, University of Linkoeping.
McElwee, Pamela. 2012. “Payments for Environmental Services as Neoliberal Market-Based Forest Conservation in Vietnam: Panacea or Problem?” Geoforum 43: 412–426.
McElwee, Pamela. 2016. Forests Are Gold: Trees, People, and Environmental Rule in Vietnam. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Mol, Arthur P. 2003. Globalization and Environmental Reform: The Ecological Modernization of the Global Economy. Boston: MIT Press.
Nguyen, Minh T.N. 2018. “Vietnam’s ‘Socialization’ policy and the moral subject in a privatizing economy.” Economy and Society 47 (4): 627–647.
O’Brien, Kevin J., and Lianjiang Li. 2006. Rightful Resistance in Rural China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Rourke, Dara. 2004. Community-Driven Regulation: Balancing Development and the Environment in Vietnam. London: MIT Press.
Petras, James. 1999. “NGOs: In the Service of Imperialism.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 29 (4): 429–440.
Pham, Susann. 2023. Vietnam’s Dissidents: Political Dissonance in the Age of Global Capitalism and Coloniality. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Saito, Kohei. 2023. Marx in the Anthropocene: Towards the Idea of Degrowth Communism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Sikor, Thomas, ed. 2013. The Justices and Injustices of Ecosystem Services. London: Routledge.
Trinh, Binh. 2022. “The Moral Middle-Class in Market Socialism: An Investigation into the Personhood of Women Working in NGOs in Vietnam.” Asian Journal of Social Science 50: 104–111.
Wei, Lan, and Minh T.N. Nguyen. 2021. “Playing the Edge Ball: The Politics of Transgression in Land Development in Southern China.” Focaal Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 1–14.
Weller, Robert P. 2006. Discovering Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wells-Dang, Andrew. 2011. “Informal Pathbreakers: Civil Society Networks in China and Vietnam.” PhD thesis, University of Birmingham.
Whitney, Corey William, Vang Sin Min, Le Hong Giang, Vu Van Can, Keith Barber and Tran Thi Lanh. 2016. “Learning with Elders: Human Ecology and Ethnobotany Explorations in Northern and Central Vietnam.” Human Organization 75 (1): 71–86.
Wischermann, Jörg, and Dang Thi Viet Phuong. 2017. “Vietnam.” In Routledge Handbook of Civil Society in Asia, edited by Akihiro Ogawa, pp. 129–142. London: Routledge.
Wischermann, Jörg, and Gerhard Will, eds. 2018. Vietnam: Mythen und Wirklichkeiten [Vietnam: Myths and Realities]. Schriftenreihe/ Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung Band 10297. Bonn: bpb Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.
Wong, Wendy H. 2012. Internal Affairs: How the Structure of NGOs Transforms Human Rights. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 70 | 70 | 13 |
| Full Text Views | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Resistance to sustainable development policies in authoritarian contexts is a global phenomenon. In Vietnam, the state tries to prevent resistance using repressive-responsive measures and instrumentalises the sustainable development discourse under its ecological modernisation program to frame the measures. NGO s and communities may only participate in governance processes within boundaries and narratives defined by the Vietnamese state. The sustainable development paradigm as a norm is therefore omni-present. Still, resistance to the state’s definition of sustainable development exists. This article illustrates how a farming community resists the narrative and shows how a Vietnamese NGO mediates the community’s covert everyday resistance to overt forms and rightful resistance. It achieves case-based successes by making paradoxes between different discourses productive. This article contributes to understanding the role of the sustainable development discourse in Vietnam and argues that resistance is actually taking place despite a widespread will to be modern. It adds to the literature on resistance by enabling an in-depth look into the process of mediation between different forms of resistance.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 70 | 70 | 13 |
| Full Text Views | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 2 | 2 | 0 |