Save

Diaristische Aufzeichnung, publizistische Umsetzung

Konfessionsbedingte Dispositive der Kriegsdarstellung

Diary Documentation, Publicized Elaboration

Denomination-dependant Dispositions in Depictions of War
In: Daphnis
Author:
Franz M. Eybl Universitäts-Professor (a.D.), Institut für Germanstik, Universität Wien, Österreich, franz.eybl@univie.ac.at

Search for other papers by Franz M. Eybl in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€36.93

Two Jesuits accompanied duke Maximilian’s campaign from Munich to Prague in 1620 in their courtly functions and recorded in Latin diaries the advance through Upper and Lower Austria and Bohemia as eyewitnesses. Johann Buslidius was the prince’s archivist, Jeremias Drexel his court preacher, one of the most important and successful religious writers of the epoch. This essay attempts to describe the conditions for recording and publishing war depictions in the context of Upper German Catholic denominational culture. Discussed are the differences between incident and recording (on the basis of different diary entries concerning a mutiny in Linz, Upper Austria), the thematization of war in Drexel’s religious writings, the differences between recording and printing in official publications about the war campaign (journal, pamphlet, panegyric, sermon) as well as the denominational differences in the evaluation and historical classification of the Thirty Years War.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 307 42 3
Full Text Views 39 3 0
PDF Views & Downloads 87 9 0