This paper explores the cognitive semantics of the typological category âpossessionâ using the Natural Semantic Metalanguage (nsm) approach. At the macro level, we argue that âpossessionâ is not a unitary cognitive category for speakers, but instead represents an aggregation of diverse semantic schemas which center around three distinct conceptual anchor points: ownership, body-parts, and kinship relations. It is shown how each of these conceptual anchor points can be clearly identified using the nsm metalanguage of semantic primes and molecules. At the micro level, the paper undertakes a close examination of the cognitive semantics of English s-genitives in the frame [THIS SOMEONEâS] SOMETHING, e.g. Maryâs ring, Maryâs shoes, Maryâs drawing, Maryâs plate, Maryâs train. It is argued that the wide range of use of the s-genitive can be captured in a set of five semantic schemas, which constitute a network of grammatical polysemy.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Aikhenvald Alexandra Y. 2012. Possession and ownership: A crosslinguistic perspective. In Aikhenvald A. Y. and Dixon R. M. W. (eds.), Possession and Ownership: A Cross-Linguistic Typology, 1â64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bally Charles . 1996. The expression of concepts of the personal domain and indivisibility in Indo-European languages. Translated by Christine Béal and Hilary Chappell. In Chappell H. and McGregor W. B. (eds.), The Grammar of Inalienability, 31â61. [First published 1926.]
Biber Douglas , Johansson Stig , Leech Geoffery , Conrad Susan , and Finegan Edward . 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.
Chappell Hilary . 2002. The universal syntax of semantic primes in Mandarin Chinese. In Goddard C. and Wierzbicka A. (eds.), Meaning and Universal Grammar â Theory and Empirical Findings, Vol. I, 243â322. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chappell Hilary and McGregor William B. . 1996. The Grammar of Inalienability: A Typological Perspective on Body Part Terms and the Part-Whole Relation . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Croft William . 1990. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croft William . 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dixon R. M. W. 2009. Basic Linguistic Theory, Volume 2: Grammatical Topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Evans Nicholas and Wilkins David . 2000. In the mindâs ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76: 546â592.
Evans Nicholas and Levinson Stephen C. . 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(5): 429â448.
Goddard Cliff . 2008. Cross-Linguistic Semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goddard Cliff . 2011. Semantic Analysis. [Revised 2nd edition]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goddard Cliff . 2018. Ten Lectures on Natural Semantic Metalanguage: Exploring Language, Thought and Culture Using Simple, Translatable Words . (Distinguished Lectures in Cognitive Linguistics). Leiden: Brill.
Goddard Cliff and Wierzbicka Anna . 2002. Meaning and Universal GrammarâTheory and Empirical Findings . Vols I and II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goddard Cliff and Wierzbicka Anna . 2014. Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics across Domains, Languages, and Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goddard Cliff and Wierzbicka Anna . 2016. âItâs mine!â. Re-thinking the conceptual semantics of âpossessionâ through nsm. Language Sciences 56: 93â104.
Goddard Cliff and Wierzbicka Anna . 2018. Direct and indirect speech revisited: Semantic universals and semantic diversity. In Capone Alessandro , GarcÃa-Carpintero Manuel , and Falzone Alessandra (eds.), Indirect Reports in the Worldâs Languages, 173â200. Springer.
Goddard Cliff and Anna Wierzbicka . 2019. Reported speech as a pivotal human phenomenon: Response to Spronck and Nikitina. Linguistic Typology 23(1): 167â175.
Goddard Cliff , Wierzbicka Anna and Fábrega Horacio , Jr. 2014. Evolutionary semantics: Using nsm to model stages in human cognitive evolution. Language Sciences 42: 60â79.
Greenberg Joseph H. 1966. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg J. H. (ed.), Universals of Language (2nd edition), 73â113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Haspelmath Martin . 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86(3): 663â688.
Heine Bernd . 1997. Possession. Cognitive Sources, Forces, and Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levisen Carsten and Waters Sophia . 2017. Cultural Keywords in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lyons John . 1977. Semantics. Vol 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGregor William B. 2009. The Expression of Possession. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Payne John and Huddleston Rodney . 2002. Ch5: Nouns and noun phrases. In Huddleston R. and Pullum G. K. (eds.), The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peeters Bert . 2006. Semantic Primes and Universal Grammar: Evidence from the Romance Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Poutsma H. 1914. A Grammar of Late Modern English. Part II: The Parts of Speech. Groningen: Noordhoff.
Sapir Edward . 1917. Review of âHet Identificeerend Karakter der Possessieve Flexie in Talen van Noord-Amerika (The Identifying Character of the Possessive Inflection in Languages of North America)â by Uhlenbeck C. C. . International Journal of American Linguistics 1(1): 86â90.
Seiler Hansjakob . 1983. Possession as An Operative Dimension of Language. Tübigen: Günther Narr.
Shumaker Nancy W. 1975. The semantics of the English âs genitive. American Speech 50(1/2): 70â86.
Song Jae Jung . 2018. Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stassen Leon . 1997. Intransitive Predication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stassen Leon . 2009. Predicative Possession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stassen Leon . 2011. The problem of cross-linguistic identification. In Song Jae Jung (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Talmy Leonard . 2000. Towards a Cognitive Semantics . Vols I and II. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Taylor John R. 1996. Possessives in English: An Exploration in Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.
van der Auwera Johan and Nuyts Jan . 2007. Cognitive linguistics and linguistic typology. In Geeraerts D. and Cuyckens H. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 1074â1091. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wierzbicka Anna . 1976. Mind and body. In McCawley J. (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 7. Notes from the Linguistic Underground, 129â157. New York: Academic Press.
Wierzbicka Anna . 1988. The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wierzbicka Anna . 1996. Semantics: Primes and Universals . New York: Oxford University Press.
Wierzbicka Anna . 2007. Bodies and their parts: An nsm approach to semantic typology. Language Sciences 29(1): 14â65.
Wierzbicka Anna . 2008. Case in nsm: A reanalysis of the Polish dative. In Malchukov A. and Spencer A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case, 151â169. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wierzbicka Anna . 2009. âReciprocityâ: An nsm approach to linguistic typology and social universals. Studies in Language 33(1): 103â174.
Wierzbicka Anna . 2015. Innate conceptual primitives manifested in the languages of the world and in infant cognition. In Margolis E. and Laurence S. (eds.), Concepts: New Directions, 379â412. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wierzbicka Anna . 2016. Back to âmotherâ and âfatherâ. Overcoming the Eurocentrism of kinship studies using eight lexical universals. Current Anthropology 57(4): 408â429.
Ye Zhengdao . 2010. Eating and drinking in Mandarin and Shanghainese: A lexical-conceptual analysis. In Christensen W. , Schier E. , and Sutton J. (eds.), ASCS09: Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science, 375â83. Sydney: Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science.
Ye Zhengdao . 2017. The Semantics of Nouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1656 | 181 | 20 |
| Full Text Views | 160 | 8 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 222 | 14 | 0 |
This paper explores the cognitive semantics of the typological category âpossessionâ using the Natural Semantic Metalanguage (nsm) approach. At the macro level, we argue that âpossessionâ is not a unitary cognitive category for speakers, but instead represents an aggregation of diverse semantic schemas which center around three distinct conceptual anchor points: ownership, body-parts, and kinship relations. It is shown how each of these conceptual anchor points can be clearly identified using the nsm metalanguage of semantic primes and molecules. At the micro level, the paper undertakes a close examination of the cognitive semantics of English s-genitives in the frame [THIS SOMEONEâS] SOMETHING, e.g. Maryâs ring, Maryâs shoes, Maryâs drawing, Maryâs plate, Maryâs train. It is argued that the wide range of use of the s-genitive can be captured in a set of five semantic schemas, which constitute a network of grammatical polysemy.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1656 | 181 | 20 |
| Full Text Views | 160 | 8 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 222 | 14 | 0 |