Allwood Jens, . 2003. Meaning potentials and context: some consequences for the analysis of variation in meaning. In Cuyckens H., , Dirven R., , and Taylor J. R. (eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics, 29–65. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

AllwoodJens. 2003. Meaning potentials and context: some consequences for the analysis of variation in meaning. In CuyckensH., DirvenR., and TaylorJ. R. (eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics, 29–65. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Anderson Stephen R.1982. Where’s morphology? Linguistic Inquiry 13: 571–612.

AndersonStephen R.1982. Where’s morphology?Linguistic Inquiry 13: 571–612.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Barlow Michael, , and Kemmer Suzanne (eds.), 2000. Usage-Based Models of Language. Stanford: csli.

BarlowMichael, and KemmerSuzanne (eds.), 2000. Usage-Based Models of Language. Stanford: csli.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Eddington David. 2007. Flaps and other variants of /t/ in American English: allophonic distribution without constraints, rules, or abstractions. Cognitive Linguistics 18: 23–46.

EddingtonDavid. 2007. Flaps and other variants of /t/ in American English: allophonic distribution without constraints, rules, or abstractions. Cognitive Linguistics 18: 23–46.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Fauconnier Gilles, , and Turner Mark. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.

FauconnierGilles, and TurnerMark. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Fodor Jerry A.1979. The Language of Thought. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.

FodorJerry A.1979. The Language of Thought. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

———. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, ma: mit Press.

———. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, ma: mit Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Goldberg Adele E.1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

GoldbergAdele E.1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Haiman John. 1980. Dictionaries and encyclopedias. Lingua 50: 329–57.

HaimanJohn. 1980. Dictionaries and encyclopedias. Lingua 50: 329–57.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Hopper Paul J., 1998. Emergent Grammar. In: Tomasello M. (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, 155–75. Mahwah, nj: Erlbaum.

HopperPaul J.1998. Emergent Grammar. In: TomaselloM. (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, 155–75. Mahwah, nj: Erlbaum.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Kemmer Suzanne. 1993. The Middle Voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

KemmerSuzanne. 1993. The Middle Voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Lakoff George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

LakoffGeorge. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

———. 1990. The invariance hypothesis: is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1: 39–74.

———. 1990. The invariance hypothesis: is abstract reason based on image-schemas?Cognitive Linguistics 1: 39–74.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Lakoff George, , and Johnson Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

LakoffGeorge, and JohnsonMark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Lakoff George, , and Núñez Rafael E.. 2000. Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Mind. New York: Basic Books.

LakoffGeorge, and NúñezRafael E.. 2000. Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Mind. New York: Basic Books.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Langacker Ronald W., 1977. Syntactic Reanalysis. In Li C. N. (ed.), Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, 57–139. Austin: University of Texas Press.

LangackerRonald W.1977. Syntactic Reanalysis. In LiC. N. (ed.), Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, 57–139. Austin: University of Texas Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

———. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

———. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

———. 1988. A usage-based model. In Rudzka-Ostyn B. (ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics, 127–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

———. 1988. A usage-based model. In Rudzka-OstynB. (ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics, 127–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

———. 2000. A dynamic usage-based model. In Barlow M., and Kemmer S. (eds.), Usage-Based Models of Language, 1–63. Stanford: csli.

———. 2000. A dynamic usage-based model. In BarlowM. and KemmerS. (eds.), Usage-Based Models of Language, 1–63. Stanford: csli.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

———. 2004. Form, meaning and behavior: the cognitive grammar analysis of double subject constructions. In Contini-Morava E., , Kirsner R. S., , and Rodríguez-Bachiller B. (eds.), Cognitive and Communicative Approaches to Linguistic Analysis, 21–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

———. 2004. Form, meaning and behavior: the cognitive grammar analysis of double subject constructions. In Contini-MoravaE., KirsnerR. S., and Rodríguez-BachillerB. (eds.), Cognitive and Communicative Approaches to Linguistic Analysis, 21–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

———. 2006. On the continuous debate about discreteness. Cognitive Linguistics 17: 107–51.

———. 2006. On the continuous debate about discreteness. Cognitive Linguistics 17: 107–51.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

———. 2010. How not to disagree: the emergence of structure from usage. In Boye K., and Engberg-Pedersen E. (eds.), Language Usage and Language Structure, 107–43. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

———. 2010. How not to disagree: the emergence of structure from usage. In BoyeK. and Engberg-PedersenE. (eds.), Language Usage and Language Structure, 107–43. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Pierrehumbert Janet B., 2001. Exemplar dynamics: word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Bybee J., and Hopper P. (eds.), Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, 137–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

PierrehumbertJanet B.2001. Exemplar dynamics: word frequency, lenition and contrast. In BybeeJ. and HopperP. (eds.), Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, 137–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Reddy Michael J., 1979. The conduit metaphor—A Case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Ortony A. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 284–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

ReddyMichael J.1979. The conduit metaphor—A Case of frame conflict in our language about language. In OrtonyA. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 284–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Schane Sanford A.1984. The fundamentals of particle phonology. Phonology Yearbook 1: 129–55.

SchaneSanford A.1984. The fundamentals of particle phonology. Phonology Yearbook 1: 129–55.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Taylor John R.2004. Linguistic Categorization. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

TaylorJohn R.2004. Linguistic Categorization. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Thompson Sandra A.2002. “Object complements” and conversation: towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26: 125–64.

ThompsonSandra A.2002. “Object complements” and conversation: towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26: 125–64.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Wierzbicka Anna. 1980. Lingua Mentalis. Sydney: Academic Press.

WierzbickaAnna. 1980. Lingua Mentalis. Sydney: Academic Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

———. 1995. Dictionaries vs. Encyclopaedias: How to draw the line. In Davis P. W. (ed.), Alternative Linguistics: Descriptive and Theoretical Modes, 289–315. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

———. 1995. Dictionaries vs. Encyclopaedias: How to draw the line. In DavisP. W. (ed.), Alternative Linguistics: Descriptive and Theoretical Modes, 289–315. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Zlatev Jordan, . 2003. Polysemy or generality? Mu. In Cuyckens H., , Dirven R., , and Taylor J. R. (eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics, 447–94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

ZlatevJordan. 2003. Polysemy or generality? Mu. In CuyckensH., DirvenR., and TaylorJ. R. (eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics, 447–94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation