Save

Heart rate responses of two breeds of four-gaited horses to a standardised field gaited test

In: Comparative Exercise Physiology
Authors:
H.C. Manso Filho Núcleo de Pesquisa Equina, Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manuel de Medeiros, s/n Dois Irmãos, 52171-900 Recife, PE, Brazil

Search for other papers by H.C. Manso Filho in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
H.E.C.C.C. Manso

Search for other papers by H.E.C.C.C. Manso in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
K.H. McKeever Equine Science Center, Department of Animal Science, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 84 Lipman Drive, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8525, USA

Search for other papers by K.H. McKeever in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S.R.R. Duarte Núcleo de Pesquisa Equina, Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manuel de Medeiros, s/n Dois Irmãos, 52171-900 Recife, PE, Brazil

Search for other papers by S.R.R. Duarte in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
J.M.G. Abreu

Search for other papers by J.M.G. Abreu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€36.93

In order to understand how gaited horses use their energy during exercise, a standardised field gaited test (SFGT) was developed to assess energy expenditure of four beat gaited horses independently of size, sex or breed. This work aimed at developing such an SFGT, using as main measurement parameter the heart rate (HR) of horses during the SFGT performance. Thirty-one four beat gaited horses were evaluated and divided into two groups: FIT (conditioned) and UNFIT (not conditioned). Horses were submitted to the SFGT and their heart rates were measured with a heart rate monitor as follows: right after being mounted, at the beginning of pre-test (HRSADDLE); at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 minutes of four beat gait dislocation; and at 15 minutes after the recovery period (T+15). Maximum HR (HRMAX); HR percentage over 150 beats per minute (HR%≯150), HR percentage over 170 beats per minute (HR%≯170), and average HR during the four beat gait stage (HRM@M) of SFGT were calculated. Results were analysed by ANOVA for repeated measures. Where significant differences were observed, ‘T’ test was performed and significance was set at 5%. The FIT group presented HRMAX, HR+15, HRM@M, HR%≯150 and HR%≯170 rates lower (P<0.05) than the UNFIT group. It was noted that there was a negative correlation between fitness and HRMAX (R=−0.67; P<0.001) and a positive correlation between HRMAX and HR+15 (R=0.60; P<0.001) when comparing the FIT to the UNFIT horses. In conclusion, during the SFGT, the FIT group was more efficient in energy expenditure than the UNFIT group, based on the results observed for the significantly lower HRs during the SFGT. It is relevant to note that the SFGT developed and used in this research, which was easily reproduced and accurate, was able to detect and confirm important adaptations related to fitness in the athletic horse.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 294 102 18
Full Text Views 11 2 0
PDF Views & Downloads 8 3 0