Eventing is considered one of the most dangerous equestrian disciplines, therefore identifying individuals with greater injury risk could aid in the administration of injury interventions. The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) is a common, non-invasive tool assessing functional asymmetries and weaknesses, with a threshold of a score of ≤14 suggesting an increased risk of injury. The aim of this research was to establish FMS scores of female collegiate Eventing riders compared to general riders. Female collegiate riders (n = 30), 14 Eventing riders and 16 general riders (amateur riders that do not participate in the discipline of Eventing), were assessed using FMS. Data were analysed using Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon tests and Odds Ratios (O.R.) The mean composite FMS score for event riders was 13.9 ± 3.4 and for general riders was 13.8 ± 2.6. There was no statistically significant difference between the composite FMS scores of event riders and general riders (
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Asa, N., Newton, A., Sullivan, L., Shi, J., Wheeler, K., Smith, G.A. and Yang, J., 2019. Horseback riding-related injuries treated in emergency departments: risk factors and prevention strategies. Journal of Safety Research 71: 251-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.09.004
Bagherian, S., Ghasempoor, K., Rahnama, N. and Wikstrom, E.A., 2019. The effect of core stability training on functional movement patterns in college athletes. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 28(5): 444-449. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2017-0107
Bennet, E.D., Cameron-Whytock, H. and Parkin, T.D., 2022a. Fédération equestre internationale eventing: risk factors for horse falls and unseated riders during the cross-country phase (2008-2018). Equine Veterinary Journal 54(5): 885-894. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13522
Bennet, E.D., Cameron-Whytock, H. and Parkin, T.D., 2022b. Fédération equestre internationale eventing: fence-level risk factors for falls during the cross-country phase (2008-2018). Equine Veterinary Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13863
Bishop, C., Read, P., Walker, S. and Turner, A.N., 2015. Assessing movement using a variety of screening tests. Professional Strength & Conditioning 37: 17-26. https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/17260/1/screening_article.pdf
Boden, E. and Randle, H., 2015. The effects of traditional neuromuscular training and rider specific training on novice horse-rider position. Journal of Sports Sciences 3: 35-43. https://doi.org/10.17265/2332-7839%2F2015.01.005
Bye, T.L. and Chadwick, G., 2018. Physical fitness habits and perceptions of equestrian riders. Comparative Exercise Physiology 14(3): 183-188. https://doi.org/10.3920/CEP180012
Bye, T.L. and Lewis, V., 2020. Saddle and stirrup forces of equestrian riders in sitting trot, rising trot, and trot without stirrups on a riding simulator. Comparative Exercise Physiology 16(1): 75-85. https://doi.org/10.3920/CEP190031
Bye, T.L. and Lewis, V., 2021. Footedness and postural asymmetry in amateur dressage riders, riding in medium trot on a dressage simulator. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 102: 103618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103618
Cameron-Whytock, H., Brigden, C. and Whytock, R., 2016. Risk factors for horse falls in the cross-country phase of national level British Eventing one day events. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Heather-Cameron-Whytock/publication/301695299_Risk_factors_for_horse_falls_in_the_cross-country_phase_of_national_level_British_Eventing_one_day_events/links/57233a6e08aef9c00b810aad/Risk-factors-for-horse-falls-in-the-cross-country-phase-of-national-level-British-Eventing-one-day-events.pdf (accessed: 7 November 2022).
Chorba, R.S., Chorba, D.J., Bouillon, L.E., Overmyer, C.A. and Landis, J.A., 2010. Use of a functional movement screening tool to determine injury risk in female collegiate athletes. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy 5(2): 47. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2953387/pdf/najspt-05-047.pdf
Clark, S.C., Rowe, N.D., Adnan, M., Brown, S.M. and Mulcahey, M.K., 2022. Effective interventions for improving functional movement screen scores among ‘high-risk’ athletes: a systematic review. The International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy 17(2): 131. https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.31001
Clayton, H.M. and Hobbs, S.J., 2017. The role of biomechanical analysis of horse and rider in equitation science. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 190: 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.011
Clayton, H.M., Smith, B. and Egenvall, A., 2017. Rein tension in novice riders when riding a horse simulator. Comparative Exercise Physiology 13(4): 237-242. https://doi.org/10.3920/CEP170010
Cook, G., Burton, L. and Hoogenboom, B., 2006a. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function – part 1. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy 1(2): 62. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2953313/pdf/najspt-01-062.pdf
Cook, G., Burton, L. and Hoogenboom, B., 2006b. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function – part 2. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy 1(3): 132. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2953359/pdf/najspt-01-132.pdf
Cook, G., Burton, L., Hoogenboom, B.J. and Voight, M., 2014a. Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-part 1. The International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy 9(3): 396. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4060319/pdf/ijspt-05-396.pdf
Cook, G., Burton, L., Hoogenboom, B.J. and Voight, M., 2014b. Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-part 2. The International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy 9(4): 549. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4127517/pdf/ijspt-08-549.pdf
Cowen, V.S., 2010. Functional fitness improvements after a worksite-based yoga initiative. Journal of Bodywork and Movevement Therapies 14(1): 50-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2009.02.006
Dashper, K., 2012. Together, yet still not equal? Sex integration in equestrian sport. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education 3(3): 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/18377122.2012.721727
de Haan, D.M., 2017. A review of the appropriateness of existing micro-and meso-level models of athlete development within equestrian sport. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences 5(1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2017.050101
Deckers, I., De Bruyne, C., Roussel, N.A., Truijen, S., Minguet, P., Lewis, V., Wilkins, C. and Van Breda, E., 2021. Assessing the sport-specific and functional characteristics of back pain in horse riders. Comparative Exercise Physiology 17(1): 7-15. https://doi.org/10.3920/CEP190075
Demarie, S.D., Galvani, C., Donatucci, B. and Gianfelici, A., 2022. A pilot study on Italian eventing prospective Olympic horse riders physiological, anthropometrical, functional and asymmetry assessment. Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine 37: 77-88. https://doi.org/10.18276/cej.2022.1-07
Douglas, J.L., Price, M. and Peters, D.M., 2012. A systematic review of physical fitness, physiological demands and biomechanical performance in equestrian athletes. Comparative Exercise Physiology 8(1): 53-62. https://doi.org/10.3920/CEP12003
Duke, S.R., Martin, S.E. and Gaul, C.A., 2017. Preseason functional movement screen predicts risk of time-loss injury in experienced male rugby union athletes. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 31(10): 2740-2747. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001838
Dumbell, L., 2022. Profiles of British equestrian Olympians: evaluating historical, socio-cultural and sporting influences and how they could inform equestrianism in the future. Available at: https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/index.php/output/8043778/profiles-of-british-equestrian-olympians-evaluating-historical-socio-cultural-and-sporting-influences-and-how-they-could-inform-equestrianism-in-the-future (accessed: 10 March 2024).
Eckardt, F. and Witte, K., 2016. Kinematic analysis of the rider according to different skill levels in sitting trot and canter. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 39: 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2015.07.022
Ekberg, J., Timpka, T., Ramel, H. and Valter, L., 2011. Injury rates and risk-factors associated with eventing: a total cohort study of injury events among adult Swedish eventing athletes. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion 18(4): 261-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2010.545129
Fédération Equestre Internationale, 2010-2021. Eventing Risk Management Programme Statistics. Available at: https://inside.fei.org/system/files/2021%20Statistics%2024.01.2022.pdf (accessed: 4 November 2023).
Fédération Equestre Internationale, 2022. Eventing Rules. Available at: https://inside.fei.org/sites/default/files/2022%20Eventin%20Rules_clean%20version.pdf (accessed: 4 November 2023).
Fédération Equestre Internationale (FEI), 2020. Eventing rules 2020. 25th ed. FEI, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 81. Available at: https://inside.fei.org/fei/disc/eventing/rules (accessed: 4 November 2023).
Gates, J.K. and Lin, C.Y., 2020. Head and spinal injuries in equestrian sports: update on epidemiology, clinical outcomes, and injury prevention. Current Sports Medicine Reports 19(1): 17-23. https://doi.org/10.1249/JSR.0000000000000674
Hampson, A. and Randle, H., 2015. The influence of an 8-week rider core fitness program on the equine back at sitting trot. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport 15(3): 1145-1159. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2015.11868858
Hobbs, S.J., Baxter, J., Broom, L., Rossell, L.A., Sinclair, J. and Clayton, H.M., 2014. Posture, flexibility and grip strength in horse riders. Journal of Human Kinetics 42(1): 113-125. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2014-0066
International Society for Equitation Science. Principles of Learning Theory in Equitation. Available at: https://www.equitationscience.com/ises-training-principles (accessed: 29 December 2023).
Kiesel, K., Plisky, P.J. and Voight, M.L., 2007. Can serious injury in professional football be predicted by a preseason functional movement screen?. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy 2(3): 147. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2953296/pdf/najspt-02-147.pdf
King, S., Wills, L. and Randle, H., 2019. Early training of foals using the ISES training principles. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 29: 140-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2018.11.001
Kraus, K., Schütz, E., Taylor, W.R. and Doyscher, R., 2014. Efficacy of the functional movement screen: a review. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 28(12): 3571-3584. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000556
Laws, A., Williams, S. and Wilson, C., 2017. The effect of clinical pilates on functional movement in recreational runners. International Journal of Sports Medicine 38(10): 776-780. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-111893
Lee, J.T., 2015. The feasibility of an 8-week, home-based isometric strength training program for improving dressage test performance in equestrian athletes. Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. https://doi.org/10.3920/CEP150018
Lewis, V. and Baldwin, K., 2018. A preliminary study to investigate the prevalence of pain in international event riders during competition, in the United Kingdom. Comparative Exercise Physiology 14(3): 173-181. https://doi.org/10.3920/CEP180006
Lewis, V. and Kennerley, R., 2017. A preliminary study to investigate the prevalence of pain in elite dressage riders during competition in the United Kingdom. Comparative Exercise Physiology 13(4): 259-263. https://doi.org/10.3920/CEP170016
Lewis, V., Bicanardi, T., Douglas, J. and Dumbell, L., 2019a. A preliminary study investigating functional movement screen test scores in novice and advanced female show jumping riders. Journal of Physical Fitness, Medicine and Treatment in Sport. https://doi.org/10.3920/CEP180036
Lewis, V., Douglas, J.L., Edwards, T. and Dumbell, L., 2019b. A preliminary study investigating functional movement screen test scores in female collegiate age horse-riders. Comparative Exercise Physiology 15(2): 105-112. https://doi.org/10.3920/CEP180036
Lewis, V., Nicol, Z., Dumbell, L. and Cameron, L., 2023. A study investigating prevalence of pain in horse riders over thirty-five years old: pain in UK riders over 35 years old. International Journal of Equine Science 2(2): 9-18.
Lisman, P., O’Connor, F.G., Deuster, P.A. and Knapik, J.J., 2013. Functional movement screen and aerobic fitness predict injuries in military training. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 45(4): 636-643. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31827a1c4c
MacKechnie-Guire, R., MacKechnie-Guire, E., Fairfax, V., Fisher, M., Hargreaves, S. and Pfau, T., 2020. The effect that induced rider asymmetry has on equine locomotion and the range of motion of the thoracolumbar spine when ridden in rising trot. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 88: 102946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2020.102946
McGreevy, P., McLean, A., Buckley, P., McConaghy, F. and McLean, C., 2011. How riding may affect welfare: what the equine veterinarian needs to know. Equine Veterinary Education 23(10): 531-539. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3292.2010.00217.x
Minick, K.I., Kiesel, K.B., Burton, L.E.E., Taylor, A., Plisky, P. and Butler, R.J., 2010. Interrater reliability of the functional movement screen. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 24(2): 479-486. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c09c04
Münz, A., Eckardt, F. and Witte, K., 2014. Horse-rider interaction in dressage riding. Human Movement Science 33: 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2013.09.003
Murray, J.K., Singer, E.R., Morgan, K.L., Proudman, C.J. and French, N.P., 2006. The risk of a horse-and-rider partnership falling on the crosscountry phase of eventing competitions. Equine Veterinary Journal 38(2): 158-163. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516406776563314
Nevison, C.M. and Timmis, M.A., 2013. The effect of physiotherapy intervention to the pelvic region of experienced riders on seated postural stability and the symmetry of pressure distribution to the saddle: a preliminary study. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 8(4): 261-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2013.01.005
O’Brien, D., 2016. Look before you leap: what are the obstacles to risk calculation in the equestrian sport of eventing?. Animals 6(2): 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6020013
Peham, C., Kotschwar, A.B., Borkenhagen, B., Kuhnke, S., Molsner, J. and Baltacis, A., 2010. A comparison of forces acting on the horse’s back and the stability of the rider’s seat in different positions at the trot. Veterinary Journal 184(1): 56-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.04.007
Smith, C.A., Chimera, N.J., Wright, N.J. and Warren, M., 2013. Interrater and intrarater reliability of the functional movement screen. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 27(4): 982-987. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182606df2
Symes, D. and Ellis, R., 2009. A preliminary study into rider asymmetry within equitation. Veterinary Journal 181(1): 34-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.016
Tee, J.C., Klingbiel, J.F., Collins, R., Lambert, M.I. and Coopoo, Y., 2016. Preseason functional movement screen component tests predict severe contact injuries in professional rugby union players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 30(11): 3194-3203. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001422
Teyhen, D.S., Shaffer, S.W., Lorenson, C.L., Halfpap, J.P., Donofry, D.F., Walker, M.J., Dugan, J.L. and Childs, J.D., 2012. The functional movement screen: a reliability study. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 42(6): 530-540. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2012.3838
Thompson, K. and Nesci, C., 2016. Over-riding concerns: developing safe relations in the high-risk interspecies sport of eventing. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 51(1): 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690213513266
Thompson, K., McGreevy, P. and McManus, P., 2015. A critical review of horse-related risk: a research agenda for safer mounts, riders and equestrian cultures. Animals 5(3): 561-575. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani5030372
Uldahl, M., Christensen, J.W. and Clayton, H.M., 2021. Relationships between the rider’s pelvic mobility and balance on a gymnastic ball with equestrian skills and effects on horse welfare. Animals 11(2): 453. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020453
Venter, R.E., Masterson, C., Tidbury, G.B. and Krkeljas, Z., 2017. Relationship between functional movement screening and performance tests in elite university female netball players. South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation 39(1): 189-198. https://journals.co.za/doi/epdf/10.10520/EJC-6535c9b60
Williams, J. and Tabor, G., 2017. Rider impacts on equitation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 190: 28-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.019
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 279 | 136 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 38 | 25 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 80 | 50 | 0 |
Eventing is considered one of the most dangerous equestrian disciplines, therefore identifying individuals with greater injury risk could aid in the administration of injury interventions. The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) is a common, non-invasive tool assessing functional asymmetries and weaknesses, with a threshold of a score of ≤14 suggesting an increased risk of injury. The aim of this research was to establish FMS scores of female collegiate Eventing riders compared to general riders. Female collegiate riders (n = 30), 14 Eventing riders and 16 general riders (amateur riders that do not participate in the discipline of Eventing), were assessed using FMS. Data were analysed using Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon tests and Odds Ratios (O.R.) The mean composite FMS score for event riders was 13.9 ± 3.4 and for general riders was 13.8 ± 2.6. There was no statistically significant difference between the composite FMS scores of event riders and general riders (
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 279 | 136 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 38 | 25 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 80 | 50 | 0 |