Save

The effect percussive therapy on equine thoracic profile, mechanical nociceptive thresholds, spinal and limb kinematics and gait symmetry

In: Comparative Exercise Physiology
Authors:
G. Tabor Hartpury University, Gloucester, Glos. GL19 3BE, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by G. Tabor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
N. Nason R3 Rapide Studios, De Havilland Court, Penn Street, Amersham, HP7 0PX, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by N. Nason in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
C. Maddock Hartpury University, Gloucester, Glos. GL19 3BE, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by C. Maddock in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€36.93

Abstract

Therapeutic devices are increasingly used by therapists and horse owners. Percussive therapy (PCT) has been shown to effect blood flow, tissue oxygenation, increase range of motion (ROM) and improve recovery in humans. The aims of this study were to investigate the immediate effects of PCT on horses. Using a within-subjects randomised blinded cross-over design, twelve polo horses in training received two 12-min PCT sessions to the major superficial muscle groups, with the device on or off, 24-h apart. Pre- and post-intervention or sham sessions epaxial muscle mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNT) and thoracic (T) profile dimensions were measured. Each horse performed four in-hand trot passes where spinal kinematics and gait symmetry were measured with inertial measurement units, plus stride length was analysed via 2D video recordings. There were no significant differences between MNT measures. Within the sham group, thoracic profile was significantly different pre and post at T18 (mean change -0.48 cm ± 1.03; P = 0.003) and in the intervention group, there was a significant difference between the pre and post at T13 (mean change = −0.76 cm ± 1.35). There was no significant difference in stride length or gait symmetry at the poll, withers, and pelvis but differences in T6, T13, L3 and sacrum ROM in the sham group and T6 and T18 in the intervention group were seen. Overall, the application of PCT did not result in MNT or stride length changes in the intervention group when compared to the sham scenario although there were minor changes to thoracolumbar profile and spinal ROM. Further research assessing walk kinematics, ridden horse performance are recommended, along with assessing different PCT applications and other variables such as blood flow and neurophysiological responses that affect behaviour.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 907 353 27
Full Text Views 122 74 6
PDF Views & Downloads 399 175 12