Save

Global postural re-education versus Egoscue exercises in upper cross syndrome on neck pain, forward head and rounded shoulder posture: a randomised clinical trial

In: Comparative Exercise Physiology
Authors:
V. Aghav Department of Orthopedic Physiotherapy, KAHER Institute of Physiotherapy, Belagavi 590010, Karnataka, India

Search for other papers by V. Aghav in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0831-2950
,
P. Gurudut Department of Orthopedic Physiotherapy, KAHER Institute of Physiotherapy, Belagavi 590010, Karnataka, India

Search for other papers by P. Gurudut in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8055-4289
,
V. Kage Department of Orthopedic Physiotherapy, KAHER Institute of Physiotherapy, Belagavi 590010, Karnataka, India

Search for other papers by V. Kage in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1013-4032
, and
A. Welling Department of Orthopedic Physiotherapy, KAHER Institute of Physiotherapy, Belagavi 590010, Karnataka, India

Search for other papers by A. Welling in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7901-4840
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€36.93

Abstract

Upper crossed syndrome (UCS) is a condition that is caused due to alternating tightness and weakness in the opposite muscle groups of the neck, shoulders, and upper back which results in abnormal postural deviations. Global postural re-education (GPR) and Egoscue exercises (EE) aim to improve postural alignment and reduce musculoskeletal discomfort by maintaining certain postures. There is a lack of literature where these approaches are not compared and hence the need arises to evaluate their efficacy in the management of UCS. A randomised clinical trial was conducted on 34 individuals with UCS, where 17 individuals were randomly allocated into two groups, i.e. Group A (GPR) and Group B (EE). Both groups received conventional therapy (hot moist pack and interferential current therapy) 3 times/week for 4 weeks. Outcome measures like craniovertebral angle (CVA), pectoralis minor index (PMI), tragus to wall test (TTW), deep cervical flexors endurance, neck disability index (NDI), and patient satisfaction were assessed at baseline and on day 12 post-treatment. Within group analysis has shown statistical significant improvement in all the outcomes ( P < 0.05). Between group analysis has shown both interventions to be equally effective in CVA ( P = 0.375), PMI ( P = 0.658), TTW ( P = 0.085), deep cervical flexors endurance ( P = 0.812), NDI ( P = 0.708) and patient satisfaction scale (PSS) ( P = 0.245) in individuals with UCS. In conclusion, both the interventions were equally effective and can be included in the protocol for the better outcomes in musculoskeletal dysfunctions.

This present trial was prospectively registered in the Clinical Trial Registry of India with registration number CTRI/2023/10/059361.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2617 794 75
Full Text Views 41 10 0
PDF Views & Downloads 106 30 0