The movement of the trunk and neck plays a crucial role in training and assessing the technical performance in show jumping horses. The term ‘bascule’ describes a rounded and harmonious jumping movement characterised by an arched or bulged back and a lower, stretched neck position. However, there is a lack of consensus in the literature regarding the specific kinematic features that define basculing. The question remains whether the impression of a rounded back is the result of spine flexion into an upward curved position or a combination of thorax elongation and a downward movement of the neck. Additionally, the timing of these movement components remains unclear. To address these questions, we conducted kinematic analyses on six ridden show jumpers with varying levels of competition experience. Using a simplified kinematic model, we analysed the trajectories of the trunk length, trunk height, neck length, and trunk-neck angle throughout different phases of a jump over a single 130 cm vertical fence during a training session. Furthermore, we explored potential differences in basculing execution based on the horses’ competition levels. Our findings indicate that the horses’ body posture while jumping over the fence does not exhibit true flexion of the thoracolumbar spine, resulting in an upward arched shape of the spine. Instead, during the take-off phase, the trunk shows elongation, suggesting a reduced curvature of the spine in this region, accompanied by a downward movement of the neck. However, we consistently observed a shortening of the neck segment, indicating flexion of the cervical spine. Correlation analyses suggest that these changes are associated with the horses’ level of competition, with more pronounced basculing observed in horses with higher competition levels.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Bergh, A., Egenvall, A., Olsson, E., Uhlhorn, M. and Rhodin, M., 2014. Skin displacement in the equine neck. Comparative Exercise Physiology 10: 181-186. https://doi.org/10.3920/CEP143003
Buchner, H.H.F., Savelberg, H.H.C.M., Schamhardt, H.C. and Barneveld, A., 1997. Inertial properties in Dutch Warmblood horses. Journal of Biomechanics 30: 653-658. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9290(97)00005-5
Clayton, H.M., 1989. Terminology for the description of equine jumping kinematics. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 9: 341-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-0806(89)80073-5
Cohen, J., 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA.
Deutsche Reiterliche Vereinigung e.V. (FN) (ed.), 2012. Grundausbildung für Reiter und Pferd. Richtlinien für Reiten und Fahren. Band 1. FN Verlag, Warendorf, Germany.
Deutsche Reiterliche Vereinigung e.V. (FN) (ed.), 2020. Weiterführende Ausbildung für Reiter und Pferd. Richtlinien für Reiten und Fahren. Band 2. FN Verlag, Warendorf, Germany.
Deutsche Reiterliche Vereinigung e.V. (FN) and Deutsche Richtervereinigung e.V. (eds.), 2018. Merkblatt Springpferdeprüfungen. Available at: https://www.pferd-aktuell.de/shop/broschuren-formulare-vertrage-unterrichtsmaterial/turniersport.html.
Galloux, P. and Barrey, E., 1997. Components of the total kinetic moment in jumping horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 29: 41-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb05051.x
Higgins, G., 2017. Anatomie verstehen. Gesundheitsfördernd Reiten. Franckh Kosmos Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany.
Kleven, H.K., 2010. Biomechanik und Physiotherapie für Pferde. 2nd ed. FN Verlag, Warendorf, Germany.
Lewczuk, D., 2007. The effect of training on linear jumping parameters in young stallions. Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology 4: 159-165. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1478061507890074
Lewczuk, D., 2017. Some remarks on repeatability and heritability of the bascule technique in jumping horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 54: 78-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2017.03.004
Lewczuk, D., Sloniewski, K. and Reklewski, Z., 2006. Repeatability of the horse’s jumping parameters with and without the rider. Livestock Science 99: 125-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.06.008
Mülling, C., Pfarrer, C., Reese, S., Kölle, S. and Budras, K.D. (eds.), 2013. Atlas der Anatomie des Pferdes. Schlüter Verlag, Hannover, Germany.
Powers, P. and Harrison, A., 2002. Effects of the rider on the linear kinematics of jumping horses. Sports Biomechanics 1: 135-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763140208522792
Powers, P.N.R. and Harrison, A.J., 2004. Influences of a rider on the rotation of the horse–rider system during jumping. Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology 1: 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1079/ECP20032
Richards, J.G., 1999. The measurement of human motion: a comparison of commercially available systems. Human Movement Science 18: 589-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9457(99)00023-8
Stammer, S., 2016. Das Pferd in positiver Spannung. Biomechanik und Reitlehre in Bewegung. FN Verlag, Warendorf, Germany.
Van Weeren, P.R., 2014. Training show jumpers. In: Hodgson, D.R., McKeever, K.H. and McGowan, C.M. (eds.) The athletic horse. Principles and practice of equine sports medicine. 2nd ed. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, USA, pp. 337-346.
Van Weeren, P.R., Van den Bogert, A.J. and Barneveld, A., 1990. Quantification of skin displacement in the proximal parts of the limbs of the walking horse. Equine Veterinary Journal Suppl. 22: 110-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1990.tb04746.x
Walker, V.A., Dyson, S.J., Tranquille, C.A., Tacey, J.B. and Murray, R.C., 2019. Limb and thoracolumbosacral kinematics over an upright and parallel-spread fence. Comparative Exercise Physiology 15: 55-67. https://doi.org/10.3920/cep180040
Walker, V.A., Tranquille, C.A., Harris, P., Roberts, C., McEwen, J. and Murray, R.C., 2018. Back kinematics at take-off in elite showjumping horses over an upright parallel-spread fence forming a part of a three-fence combination. Comparative Exercise Physiology 14: 161-171. https://doi.org/10.3920/cep180005
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 690 | 230 | 29 |
| Full Text Views | 69 | 33 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 161 | 70 | 0 |
The movement of the trunk and neck plays a crucial role in training and assessing the technical performance in show jumping horses. The term ‘bascule’ describes a rounded and harmonious jumping movement characterised by an arched or bulged back and a lower, stretched neck position. However, there is a lack of consensus in the literature regarding the specific kinematic features that define basculing. The question remains whether the impression of a rounded back is the result of spine flexion into an upward curved position or a combination of thorax elongation and a downward movement of the neck. Additionally, the timing of these movement components remains unclear. To address these questions, we conducted kinematic analyses on six ridden show jumpers with varying levels of competition experience. Using a simplified kinematic model, we analysed the trajectories of the trunk length, trunk height, neck length, and trunk-neck angle throughout different phases of a jump over a single 130 cm vertical fence during a training session. Furthermore, we explored potential differences in basculing execution based on the horses’ competition levels. Our findings indicate that the horses’ body posture while jumping over the fence does not exhibit true flexion of the thoracolumbar spine, resulting in an upward arched shape of the spine. Instead, during the take-off phase, the trunk shows elongation, suggesting a reduced curvature of the spine in this region, accompanied by a downward movement of the neck. However, we consistently observed a shortening of the neck segment, indicating flexion of the cervical spine. Correlation analyses suggest that these changes are associated with the horses’ level of competition, with more pronounced basculing observed in horses with higher competition levels.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 690 | 230 | 29 |
| Full Text Views | 69 | 33 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 161 | 70 | 0 |