Save

Sport science relevance and integration in horseracing: perceptions of UK racehorse trainers

In: Comparative Exercise Physiology
Authors:
H. Richardson Hartpury University, Hartpury House, GL19 3BE Gloucester, United Kingdom.

Search for other papers by H. Richardson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R. Collins Hartpury University, Hartpury House, GL19 3BE Gloucester, United Kingdom.

Search for other papers by R. Collins in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
J.M. Williams Hartpury University, Hartpury House, GL19 3BE Gloucester, United Kingdom.

Search for other papers by J.M. Williams in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€36.93

Whilst equestrian sport science research has expanded over recent years, and technologies to positively impact training and performance have been developed, long-standing traditions and experiential learning in the racing industry still appear to impede the integration of sport science knowledge. This study used semi-structured interviews to investigate the perceptions of eleven national hunt and flat-based racehorse trainers to determine the current status of sport science integration within the racing industry, the perceived barriers to its uptake, and areas where trainers sought further knowledge. Three key higher order themes emerged from the interviews: the current training and monitoring principles for health and fitness of racehorses, trainers’ attitudes toward sport science research, and areas for potential future research and integration of sports science in training. Subjective methods grounded in personal experience were found to form the basis of racehorse training principles, with the application of sport science minimal, namely due to poor integration strategies. Negative connotations arising from a general lack of understanding of the application of knowledge and a scepticism toward adapting already successful principles, as well as pressure from industry stakeholders, appear to create barriers to sport science uptake. Trainers felt a stronger evidence base emphasising performance benefits is needed to overcome these. Where trainers identified areas of research potential, many studies had already been undertaken, highlighting the necessity for effective dissemination strategies to demonstrate how research could apply to industry practice. Increased educational initiatives to showcase technology and improve trainer understanding and application of currently available sport science knowledge is also warranted.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 691 230 22
Full Text Views 60 28 1
PDF Views & Downloads 144 72 3