The book of Jeremiah is well-known for the aporias and fractures within its text, which are much discussed. In Jeremiah 39–44 these confusions appear as indicative of two antagonistic community identities, one of which seeks (and fails) to repress the other in their claims to be the people of Israel’s God. These identities arose after the conquest of Judah by Babylon, as a shattered and divided community sought to understand their new situations. Using the postcolonial ideas of Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o and Homi Bhabha and the historiographical work of Michel-Rolph Trouillot, I argue that in the historical narrative of this section of Jeremiah, the ghost of the Judahite community established by Gedaliah appears as a communitas interruptus, making claims on the prophet, the land, and on God, haunting and disrupting the claim of migrating golahites to be the true, surviving people of Israel’s God even as they are written out of the narrative.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Rainer Albertz, Israel in Exile: the History and Literature of the Sixth Centurybce (Leiden: Brill, 2004).
Leslie C. Allen, Jeremiah: a Commentary (London: T&T Clark, 2004).
Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London: Verso, 1983).
Hans Barstad, The Myth of the Empty Land: A Study in the History and Archaeology of Judah during the “Exilic” Period (Symbolae Osloenses; Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, 1996) vol. 28.
Ehud Ben Zvi, ‘The Voice and Role of a Counterfactual Memory in the Construction of Exile and Return: Considering Jeremiah 40:7–12,’ in Ehud Ben Zvi and Christoph Levin (ed.), The Concept of Exile in Ancient Israel and its Historical Contexts (Berlin, New York: De Gruyter, 2010), pp. 169–188.
Homi K. Bhabha, ‘Representation and the Colonial Text: A Critical Exploration of Some Forms of Mimeticism,’ in Frank Gloversmith (ed.), The Theory of Reading (Brighton & Totowa, N.J.: Harvester Press, 1984), pp. 93–120.
Homi K. Bhabha, ‘Interrogating Identity: The Postcolonial Prerogative,’ in David Theo Goldberg (ed.), Anatomy of Racism (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1990), pp. 183–209.
Homi K. Bhabha, ‘A Question of Survival: Nations and Psychic States,’ in Donald James (ed.), Psychoanalysis and Cultural Theory: Thresholds (London: Macmillan, 1991), pp. 89–103.
Homi K. Bhabha, The Location of Culture (London; New York: Routledge, 2004).
Mark E. Biddle, ‘The Redaction of Jeremiah 39–41 [46–48 lxx]: A Prophetic Endorsement of Nehemiah?’ Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 126.2 (2014), pp.228–242.
Keith Bodner, After the Invasion: A Reading of Jeremiah 40–44 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).
David M. Carr, The Formation of the Hebrew Bible: a New Reconstruction (New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).
Robert P. Carroll, Jeremiah: A Commentary (London: scm Press, 1986).
Aimé Césaire, Discourse on Colonialism (trans. Joan Pinkham; New York: Monthly Review Press, 2000).
C. L Crouch, Israel and Judah Redefined: Migration, Trauma, and Empire in the Sixth Centurybce (Cambridge University Press, 2021).
Steed Vernyl Davidson, Empire and Exile: Postcolonial Readings of the Book of Jeremiah (London: T & T Clark, 2011).
Steed Vernyl Davidson, ‘Postcolonial Readings of the Prophets,’ in Carolyn J. Sharp (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Prophets (Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 507–526.
Steed Vernyl Davidson, ‘The Imperial End: How Empire Overtakes Refugees in Jeremiah’ Political Theology 19.6 (2018), pp.460–477.
Philip R Davies, The Origins of Biblical Israel (New York; London: T & T Clark, 2007).
Philip R. Davies, ‘The Origins of Biblical Israel,’ in Lester L. Grabbe (ed.), Enquire of the Former Age: Ancient Historiography and Writing the History of Israel (London: T & T Clark, 2011), pp. 40–48.
Frantz Fanon, The Wretched of the Earth (trans. Constance Farrington; London: Penguin, 2001).
Barbara Green, Jeremiah and God’s Plans of Well-Being (Studies on Personalities of the Old Testament; Columbia: The University of South Carolina Press, 2013).
William Lee Holladay, Jeremiah 2: A Commentary on the Book of the Prophet Jeremiah, Chapters 26–52 (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1989).
Mark Leuchter, The Polemics of Exile in Jeremiah 26–45 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).
Mark Leuchter, ‘Remembering Jeremiah in the Persian Period,’ in Diana V Edelman and Ehud Ben Zvi (ed.), Remembering Biblical Figures in the Late Persian and Early Hellenistic Periods: Social Memory and Imagination (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 384–414.
Oded Lipschits, The Fall and Rise of Jerusalem: Judah under Babylonian Rule (Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2005).
William McKane, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Jeremiah. Vol. 2, Commentary on Jeremiahxxvi–lii (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1996).
Jill Anne Middlemas, The Troubles of Templeless Judah (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).
Kathleen M O’Connor, Jeremiah: Pain and Promise (Fortress Press, 2011).
Dalit Rom-Shiloni, Exclusive Inclusivity: Identity Conflicts between the Exiles and the People Who Remained (6th–5th Centuriesbce) (New York: T&T Clark, 2013).
Mark Roncace, Jeremiah, Zedekiah, and the Fall of Jerusalem (New York: T & T Clark, 2005).
Edward W. Said, Orientalism (London: Penguin Books, 2003).
Christopher R. Seitz, Theology in Conflict: Reactions to the Exile in the Book of Jeremiah (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1989).
Carolyn J. Sharp, Prophecy and Ideology in Jeremiah: Struggles for Authority in Deutero-Jeremianic Prose (London: T&T Clark, 2003).
Carolyn Sharp, Jeremiah 26–52 (International Exegetical Commentary on the Old Testament; Stuttgart: Kohlhammer Verlag, 2021).
Daniel L. Smith, The Religion of the Landless: A Sociology of the Babylonian Exile (Bloomington, IN: Meyer-Stone Books, 1989).
Daniel L. Smith-Christopher, A Biblical Theology of Exile (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2002).
Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o, Decolonising the Mind: the Politics of Language in African Literature (Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2011).
Michel-Rolph Trouillot, Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History (Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press, 2015).
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 300 | 140 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 66 | 38 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 144 | 87 | 1 |
The book of Jeremiah is well-known for the aporias and fractures within its text, which are much discussed. In Jeremiah 39–44 these confusions appear as indicative of two antagonistic community identities, one of which seeks (and fails) to repress the other in their claims to be the people of Israel’s God. These identities arose after the conquest of Judah by Babylon, as a shattered and divided community sought to understand their new situations. Using the postcolonial ideas of Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o and Homi Bhabha and the historiographical work of Michel-Rolph Trouillot, I argue that in the historical narrative of this section of Jeremiah, the ghost of the Judahite community established by Gedaliah appears as a communitas interruptus, making claims on the prophet, the land, and on God, haunting and disrupting the claim of migrating golahites to be the true, surviving people of Israel’s God even as they are written out of the narrative.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 300 | 140 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 66 | 38 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 144 | 87 | 1 |