The term âintertextualityâ has been in use in biblical studies for over three decades. However, the study of the relationship of biblical elements (e.g. theme and pattern) in the ot and how it functions as a compositional framework in the nt seems to have gained less attention. This paper, thus, aims to investigate whether the temple cleansing-rebuilding tradition in the ot underlies Johnâs Gospel as a compositional framework by: (1) introducing the term âhyper-intertextualityâ; (2) discussing the distinctive pericope of Jesusâ temple cleansing in Johnâs Gospel; and (3) formulating a comparative method adapted from Hallidayâs sociolinguistic theory of context of situation as a heuristic tool.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Adamczewski, Bartosz. 2010. The Gospel of the Narrative âWeâ: The Hypertextual Relationship of the Fourth Gospel to the Acts of the Apostles (Berlin: Peter Lang).
Adamczewski, Bartosz. 2018. The Gospel of John: A Hypertextual Commentary (European Studies in Theology, Philosophy and History of Religions, 17; Berlin: Peter Lang).
Ashton, John. 2007. Understanding the Fourth Gospel (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Barrett, C.K. 1978. The Gospel According to St. John: An Introduction with Commentary and Notes on the Greek Text (2nd edn; Philadelphia: Westminster Press).
Beasley-Murray, G.R. 1999. John (wbc, 36; 2nd edn; Nashville: Thomas Nelson).
Bieringer, Reimund et al. (eds). 2001. Anti-Judaism and the Fourth Gospel (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox): 121â230.
Brown, Raymond E. 1966. The Gospel According to John IâXII (ab, 29; Garden City, NY: Doubleday).
Carson, D.A. 1991. The Gospel According to John (PilNTC; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
Coloe, Mary L. 2001.God Dwells with Us: Temple Symbolism in the Fourth Gospel (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical).
Dimant, Devorah. 1991. âLiterary Typologies and Biblical Interpretation in the Hellenistic-Roman Periodâ, in S. Talmon (ed.), Jewish Civilization in the Hellenistic-Roman Period, (JSPSup, 10; Sheffield: jsot Press): 73â80.
Eggins, Suzanne, and J.R. Martin. 1997. âGenres and Registers of Discourseâ, in T. A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Structure and Process: Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction (London: sage): 230â56.
Genette, Gérard. 1997. Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree (Lincoln: University of Nebraska).
Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning (London: Edward Arnold).
Halliday, M. A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1989. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Harrington, Daniel J. 1989. âThe Jews in Johnâs Gospelâ, The Bible Today 27: 203â9.
Hatina, Thomas R. 1999 âIntertextuality and Historical Criticism in New Testament Studies: Is There a Relationship?â, Biblical Interpretation 7.1: 28â43.
Haupt, Paul. 1919. âHinnom and Kidronâ, Journal of Biblical Literature 38.1: 45â48.
Hays, Richard B. 2016. Echoes of Scripture in the Gospels (Texas: Baylor University Press).
Hoskins, Paul M. 2006. Jesus as the Fulfillment of the Temple in the Gospel of John (Paternoster Biblical Monographs, Milton Keynes: Paternoster).
Hoskyns, Edwyn Clement. 1947.The Fourth Gospel (London: Faber and Faber).
Keener, Craig S. 2003. The Gospel of John: A Commentary (2 vols.; Peabody: Hendrickson).
Kierspel, Lars. 2006. The Jews and the World in the Fourth Gospel: Parallelism, Function, and Context (wunt, 220; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
Koester, Craig R. 1989. The Dwelling of God: The Tabernacle in the Old Testament, Intertestamental Jewish Literature, and the New Testament (Washington: Catholic Biblical Association of America).
Konkel, August. 2016.1 & 2. Chronicles (Believers Church Bible Commentary, 30; Harrisonburg, VA: Herald Press).
Lam, Tat Yu. 2020. âThe Effusion of Blood and Water for Purity and Sanctity: Jesusâs Body, the Passover Lamb, and the Red Heifer in Johannine Temple Christologyâ, in S. E. Porter and A. W. Pitts (eds.), Johannine Christology, (Johannine Studies, 3; Leiden: Brill): 203â22.
Landow, George P. 1992.Hypertext: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology (Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press).
Lightfoot, R. H. 1966.St. Johnâs Gospel: A Commentary (repr.; Glasgow: Oxford University Press).
Lincoln, Andrew T. 2005.The Gospel According to Saint John (bntc; London: Continuum).
Lindars, Barnabas. 1972.The Gospel of John (New Century Bible; London: Oliphants).
Meek, Russell. 2014. âIntertextuality, Inner-Biblical Exegesis, and Inner-Biblical Allusion: The Ethics of a Methodologyâ, Biblica 95.2: 280â91.
Milgrom, Jacob. 1983. Studies in the Cultic Theology and Terminology (sjla, 36; Leiden: Brill).
Morris, Leon. 1995. The Gospel According to John. (rev.; nicnt; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
Mosiye, Steve. 2000. âIntertextuality and the Study of the Old Testament in the New Testamentâ, in Steve Moyise (ed.), The Old Testament in the New Testament: Essays in Honour of J. L. North, (JSNTSup, 189; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic): 14â41.
Mosiye, Steve. 2002 âIntertextuality and Biblical Studies: A Reviewâ, Verbum et Ecclesia 23.2: 418â31.
Porter, Stanley E. 2015. John, His Gospel, and Jesus: In Pursuit of the Johannine Voice (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
Ridderbos, H. N. 1997. The Gospel According to John: A Theological Commentary (trans. John Vriend; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
Roth, Wolfgang. 1997. âTo Invert or Not to Invert: The Pharisaic Canon in the Gospelsâ, in C. A. Evans and J. A. Sanders (eds.), Early Christian Interpretation of the Scriptures of Israel: Investigations and Proposals, (JSNTSup 148; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic): 59â78.
Schuchard, Bruce G. 2018. âTemple, Festivals, and Scritpure in the Gospel of Johnâ, in J. M. Lieu and M. C. de Boer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Johannine Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 381â95.
Schweitzer, Steven James. 2011. âThe Temple in SamuelâKings and Chroniclesâ, in Jeremy Corley and Harm van Grol (eds.), Rewriting Biblical History: Essays on Chronicles and Ben Sira in honor of Pancratius C. Beentjes (dcls, 7; Berlin: de Gruyter): 123â38.
Shepherd, Massey Hamilton. 1974. âJews in the Gospel of John: Another Level of Meaningâ, Anglican Theological Review 3: 95â112.
Stibbe, Mark W. G. 1993.John (Sheffield: jsot Press).
Thompson, Marianne Meye. 2015. John: A Commentary (ntl; Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox).
Tov, Emanuel. 2008. âDevorah Dimantâs Scholarship: An Overviewâ, in Moshe Bar-Asher and Emanuel Tov (eds.), Meghillot VâVI: Studies in the Dead Sea Scrolls: A Festschrift for Devorah Dimant (Jerusalem: Bialik Institute): XIIIâXIX.
Westcott, B. F. 1971.The Gospel According to St. John: The Authorized Version with Introduction and Notes. (repr.; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
Yoon, David. 2013. âThe Ideological Inception of Intertextuality and Its Dissonance in Current Biblical Studiesâ, Currents in Biblical Research 12.1: 58â76.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 809 | 184 | 12 |
| Full Text Views | 224 | 33 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 420 | 74 | 0 |
The term âintertextualityâ has been in use in biblical studies for over three decades. However, the study of the relationship of biblical elements (e.g. theme and pattern) in the ot and how it functions as a compositional framework in the nt seems to have gained less attention. This paper, thus, aims to investigate whether the temple cleansing-rebuilding tradition in the ot underlies Johnâs Gospel as a compositional framework by: (1) introducing the term âhyper-intertextualityâ; (2) discussing the distinctive pericope of Jesusâ temple cleansing in Johnâs Gospel; and (3) formulating a comparative method adapted from Hallidayâs sociolinguistic theory of context of situation as a heuristic tool.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 809 | 184 | 12 |
| Full Text Views | 224 | 33 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 420 | 74 | 0 |