Forgetting to Remember: Theorizing the Role of the Forgotten In the Production of Biblical Text and Tradition
In: Biblical InterpretationSearch for other papers by Jenna Kemp in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This article examines Exod 34:11–17 by utilizing theory of cultural memory, enriched with theory of metaphor and allusion. As the author of a late text, the scribe responsible for this insertion remembers other various biblical texts via allusion, creating synthetic categories that are useful for carrying the texts forward in time. The synthesis occurs, however, not just by remembering but also by forgetting parts of the evoked texts. The fact that they can be read together strengthens the idea that multiple texts could be considered a conceptual whole. Forgetting is therefore not just about loss; it is as a result of loss extremely productive in creating and maintaining conceptual links between texts within the tradition.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 802 | 136 | 9 |
| Full Text Views | 220 | 27 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 416 | 64 | 0 |
Forgetting to Remember: Theorizing the Role of the Forgotten In the Production of Biblical Text and Tradition
In: Biblical InterpretationSearch for other papers by Jenna Kemp in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This article examines Exod 34:11–17 by utilizing theory of cultural memory, enriched with theory of metaphor and allusion. As the author of a late text, the scribe responsible for this insertion remembers other various biblical texts via allusion, creating synthetic categories that are useful for carrying the texts forward in time. The synthesis occurs, however, not just by remembering but also by forgetting parts of the evoked texts. The fact that they can be read together strengthens the idea that multiple texts could be considered a conceptual whole. Forgetting is therefore not just about loss; it is as a result of loss extremely productive in creating and maintaining conceptual links between texts within the tradition.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 802 | 136 | 9 |
| Full Text Views | 220 | 27 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 416 | 64 | 0 |
