Are Saulâs Sons Scapegoats?
äºBiblical InterpretationSearch for other papers by Nathan Chambers in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
A number of scholars have praised the work of René Girard as opening a way forward for biblical interpretation. This essay seeks to test the utility of Girardâs theories by applying them to a close reading of 2 Samuel 21:1â14. It concludes that Girardâs work draws attention to certain neglected themes but is unable to account for the narrative of 2 Samuel 21 in its final form.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 467 | 115 | 14 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 121 | 10 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 273 | 20 | 0 |
Are Saulâs Sons Scapegoats?
äºBiblical InterpretationSearch for other papers by Nathan Chambers in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
A number of scholars have praised the work of René Girard as opening a way forward for biblical interpretation. This essay seeks to test the utility of Girardâs theories by applying them to a close reading of 2 Samuel 21:1â14. It concludes that Girardâs work draws attention to certain neglected themes but is unable to account for the narrative of 2 Samuel 21 in its final form.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 467 | 115 | 14 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 121 | 10 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 273 | 20 | 0 |
