Save

Responses of Lambs To Model Ewes

In: Behaviour
Authors:
Elizabeth Shillito Walser ARFC Institute of Animal Physiology, Babraham, Cambridge CB2 4AT

Search for other papers by Elizabeth Shillito Walser in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
E. Walters AFRC. Statistics Group, Department of Applied Biology, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3DX, England

Search for other papers by E. Walters in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
P. Hague ARFC Institute of Animal Physiology, Babraham, Cambridge CB2 4AT

Search for other papers by P. Hague in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
T. Williams ARFC Institute of Animal Physiology, Babraham, Cambridge CB2 4AT

Search for other papers by T. Williams in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€36.93

Abstract

Life sized models of sheep were used to determine the importance of sound and movement in eliciting orientation and approach of lambs. Dalesbred and Jacob lambs were tested at 3 weeks of age with two models, one of which appeared to be grazing while the other moved its head or bleated or both bleated and moved. Lambs were tested twice; their behaviour was recorded to note 1) time of orientation to models and approach; 2) positive or negative response; 3) approach within 2 m of the models. The Dalesbred lambs ran faster than the Jacobs towards the models, and more Dalesbreds responded positively on the second test. Both breeds responded more quickly to the vocal models than to the silent models; there was no difference in time of response to moving and non-moving models. 90% lambs approached and looked at the models on the first test, 51 % responded on the second test. All lambs that responded went up close to bleating models, but not to moving models. Movement did not increase attraction and seemed to deter close investigation, whereas vocalisation made the models most attractive to the lambs.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 219 27 11
Full Text Views 85 0 0
PDF Views & Downloads 11 0 0