Save

The Following Response of Young Coots and Moorhens

In: Behaviour
Authors:
R.A. Hinde Ornithological Field Station, Madingley, Cambridge

Search for other papers by R.A. Hinde in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
W.H. Thorpe Ornithological Field Station, Madingley, Cambridge

Search for other papers by W.H. Thorpe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
M.A. Vince Ornithological Field Station, Madingley, Cambridge

Search for other papers by M.A. Vince in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€36.93

Abstract

(i) Experiments with young hand-raised Moorhens (Gallinula chloropus) and Coots (Fulica atra) were performed in order to survey the nature of the factors influencing the following response. (ii) Following can be evoked by many objects quite different from each other in size and shape, but having in common the property of being in motion. (iii) The establishment of the following response is not dependent on brooding, feeding or any other activity normally directed by the parent to its young, though these may play a role in nature. (iv) Birds could be trained to follow different models on successive runs. Further, birds trained on one model would generalise to others throughout practically the whole period in which they would follow at all. In this sense, the learning is not irreversible. (v) Moorhens were more likely to follow if tested from the first day after hatching than if several days were first allowed to elapse. Fleeing increases during the first few days of life, and this may be an important factor limiting the "sensitive period" for the establishment of the following response. (vi) The following response is maintained at a steady level under conditions of massed practice only if the object on which the birds are being tested is a familiar one. The significance of this is discussed. (vii) There is no evidence that "imprinting" is fundamentally different from other types of learning. It is suggested that learning occurs when the bird follows the moving obj ect.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 448 51 15
Full Text Views 174 1 1
PDF Views & Downloads 52 0 0