Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Facial expressions are central to animal communication, yet the influence of domestication and selective breeding on their expression in dogs (Canis familiaris) remains poorly understood. This study examined the relaxed open mouth (ROM), a conserved playful signal, across 29 dog breeds and compared it with wolves (Canis lupus), using the Dog Facial Action Coding System (DogFACS) and functional clustering. Results showed that ROM execution varies across breeds and does not systematically reflect genetic relatedness to the wolf. Contrary to predictions, brachycephalic breeds did not recruit fewer muscles than meso- and dolichocephalic breeds, suggesting that skull morphology alone does not constrain ROM expression. The maximum number of action units (AUs) recruited (seven) was observed in wolves and several breeds (e.g., Basset Hound, German Shepherd, Poodle), while most other breeds recruited between four and six, indicating a general simplification of the signal in domestic dogs. Variation in ROM expression may influence intraspecific communication, with some breeds more readily interpreting one another’s facial cues. This study provides novel insights into the evolution of canine facial communication and offers a framework for comparative research across other species.
Kauf
Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):
Institutszugang
Melden Sie sich mit Open Athens, Shibboleth oder Ihren institutionellen Anmeldedaten an.
Persönliche Anmeldung
Melden Sie sich mit Ihrem brill.com-Konto an
Aloff, B. (2005). Canine body language. A photographic guide interpreting the native language of the domestic dog. — Dogwise, Wenatchee, WA.
Aria, M., Alterisio, A., Scandurra, A., Pinelli, C. & D’Aniello, B. (2021). The scholar’s best friend: Research trends in dog cognitive and behavioral studies. — Anim. Cogn. 24: 541-553.
Brooks, M.E., Kristensen, K., van Benthem, K.J., Magnusson, A., Berg, C.W., Nielsen, A., Skaug, H.J., Mächler, M. & Bolker, B.B. (2017). glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling. — R J. 9: 378-400.
Burrows, A.M., Smith, L.W., Downing, S.E., Omstead, K.M. & Smith, T.D. (2024). Evolutionary divergence of facial muscle physiology between domestic dogs and wolves. — Anat. Rec. 308: 1369-1377. DOI:10.1002/ar.25580.
Cordoni, G., Brescini, M., Pirarba, L., Giaretto, F. & Norscia, I. (2025). Functional and morphological differences in the play face and full play face in lowland gorillas, a hominid species: implications for the evolutionary roots of smile and laugh face. — Am. J. Biol. Anthropol 187: e70061.
Darwin, C. (1868). The variation of animals and plants under domestication, Vol. 2. — Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals, 3rd edn. (Ekman, P., ed.). — Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Davila-Ross, M. & Palagi, E. (2022). Laughter, play faces and mimicry in animals: evolution and social functions. — Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 377: 20210177. DOI:10.1098/rstb.2021.0177.
Davila-Ross, M., Menzler, S. & Zimmermann, E. (2008). Rapid facial mimicry in orangutan play. — Biol. Lett. 4: 27-30. DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0535.
Davila-Ross, M., Jesus, G., Osborne, J. & Bard, K.A. (2015). Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) produce the same types of ‘laugh faces’ when they emit laughter and when they are silent. — PLoS ONE 10: e0127337. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0127337.
de Waal, F.B. (2003). Darwin’s legacy and the study of primate visual communication. — Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1000: 7-31. DOI:10.1196/annals.1280.003.
Demuru, E., Collarini, E., Menon, A., Cesarano, G., Catinaud, J., Norscia, I. & Cordoni, G. (2024). Are you serious? Relaxed open mouth may unveil the competitive/cooperative nature of play fighting in two feline species. — Anim. Behav. 220: 123042. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.11.020.
Dobson, A. (2002). An introduction to Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edn. — Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
Domínguez-Oliva, A., Chávez, C., Martínez-Burnes, J., Olmos-Hernández, A., Hernández-Avalos, I. & Mota-Rojas, D. (2024). Neurobiology and anatomy of facial expressions in great apes: application of the AnimalFACS and its possible association with the animal’s affective state. — Animals 14: 3414. DOI:10.3390/ani14233414.
Dreger, D.L., Hooser, B.N., Hughes, A.M., Ganesan, B., Donner, J., Anderson, H., Holtvoigt, L. & Ekenstedt, K.J. (2019). True colors: commercially-acquired morphological genotypes reveal hidden allele variation among dog breeds, informing both trait ancestry and breed potential. — PLoS ONE 14: e0223995. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0223995.
Ekenstedt, K.J., Crosse, K.R. & Risselada, M. (2020). Canine brachycephaly: anatomy, pathology, genetics and welfare. — J. Comp. Pathol. 176: 109-115. DOI:10.1016/j.jcpa.2020.02.008.
Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V. & Hager, J.C. (2002). Facial action coding system. manual and investigator’s guide. — Research Nexus, Salt Lake City, UT.
Facondini, G., Pedruzzi, L., Aere, S., Boye, M., Lemasson, A. & Palagi, E. (2024). Rapid facial mimicry as a regulator of play in a despotic macaque species. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 78: 63. DOI:10.1007/s00265-024-03479-y.
Hammer, K. (1984). Das Domestikationssyndrom. — Kulturpflanze 32: 11-34. DOI:10.1007/BF02098682.
Hare, B., Plyusnina, I., Ignacio, N., Schepina, O., Stepika, A., Wrangham, R. & Trut, L. (2005). Social cognitive evolution in captive foxes is a correlated by-product of experimental domestication. — Curr. Biol. 15: 226-230. DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.040.
Janssens, L., Perri, A., Crombé, P., Van Dongen, S. & Lawler, D. (2019). An evaluation of classical morphologic and morphomet-ric parameters reported to distinguish wolves and dogs. — J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 23: 501-533.
Kaminski, J., Waller, B.M., Diogo, R., Hartstone-Rose, A. & Burrows, A.M. (2019). Evolution of facial muscle anatomy in dogs. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116: 14677-14681. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1820653116.
Konno, A., Romero, T., Inoue-Murayama, M., Saito, A. & Hasegawa, T. (2016). Dog breed differences in visual communication with humans. — PLoS ONE 11: e0164760.
Kret, M.E., Prochazkova, E., Sterck, E.H.M. & Clay, Z. (2020). Emotional expressions in human and non-human great apes. — Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 115: 378-395. DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.027.
Kyllar, M., Paral, V., Pyszko, M. & Doskarova, B. (2017). Facial pillars in dogs: an anatomical study. — Anat. Sci. Int. 92: 343-351. DOI:10.1007/s12565-016-0338-x.
Laidre, M.E. & Johnstone, R.A. (2013). Animal signals. — Curr. Biol. 23: R829-R833. DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.070.
Larson, G., Karlsson, E.K., Perri, A., Webster, M.T., Ho, S.Y., Peters, J., Stahl, P.W., Piper, P.J., Lingaas, F., Fredholm, M., Comstock, K.E., Modiano, J.F., Schelling, C., Agoulnik, A.I., Leegwater, P.A., Dobney, K., Vigne, J.D., Vilà, C., Andersson, L. & Lindblad-Toh, K. (2012). Rethinking dog domestication by integrating genetics, archeology, and biogeography. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 8878-8883. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1203005109.
Lord, K., Feinstein, M., Smith, B. & Coppinger, R. (2013). Variation in reproductive traits of members of the genus Canis with special attention to the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). — Behav. Process. 92: 131-142. DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2012.10.009.
Maglieri, V., Prato-Previde, E., Tommasi, E. & Palagi, E. (2019). Wolf-like or dog-like? A comparison of gazing behaviour across three dog breeds tested in their familiar environments. — R Soc. Open Sci. 6: 190946.
Maglieri, V., Zanoli, A., Mastrandrea, F. & Palagi, E. (2022). The relaxed open mouth is a true signal in dogs: demonstrating Tinbergen’s ritualisation process. — Anim. Behav. 188: 65-74. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2022.03.015.
Maglieri, V., Zanoli, A., Mastrandrea, F. & Palagi, E. (2023). Don’t stop me now, I’m having such a good time! Czechoslovakian wolfdogs renovate the motivation to play with a bow. — Curr. Zool. 69: 50-58. DOI:10.1093/cz/zoac013.
Maglieri, V., Mastrandrea, F., Galotti, A., Böye, M., Laurent, S., Marcolla, A. & Palagi, E. (2024). Tell-tale signals: Faces reveal playful and aggressive mood in wolves. — Anim. Behav. 214: 1-9. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.05.013.
Maglieri, V., Galotti, A., Petroni, L., Garzelli, A., Apollonio, M., Boni, C.B., Cappai, N., Coppola, F., Del Frate, M., Di Rosso, A., Dissegna, A., Fazzi, P., Felicioli, A., Lucchesi, M., Massolo, A. & Palagi, E. (in press). The untamed ‘smile’: rapid facial mimicry in wild wolves. — Anim. Behav.
Marshall-Pescini, S., Rao, A., Virányi, Z. & Range, F. (2017a). The role of domestication and experience in ‘looking back’ towards humans in an unsolvable task. — Sci. Rep. 7: 46636.
Marshall-Pescini, S., Schwarz, J.F.L., Kostelnik, I., Virányi, Z. & Range, F. (2017b). Importance of a species’ socioecology: Wolves outperform dogs in a conspecific cooperation task. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114: 11793-11798. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1709027114.
Martvel, G., Eretová, P., Přibylová, L., Chaloupková, H., Pongrácz, P., Shimshoni, I., Cittone, N.C., Michaeli, Y., Grinstein, D. & Zamansky, A. (2025). Continuous automated analysis of facial dynamics of brachycephalic and normocephalic dogs in different contexts. — BMC Vet. Res. 21: 372. DOI:10.1186/s12917-025-04839-0.
Mielke, A., Waller, B.M., Pérez, C., Rincon, A.V., Duboscq, J. & Micheletta, J. (2021). NetFACS: Using network science to understand facial communication systems. — Behav. Res. Methods. 54: 1912-1927. DOI:10.3758/s13428-021-01692-5.
Miklósi, Á. & Topál, J. (2013). What does it take to become ‘best friends’? Evolutionary changes in canine social competence. — Trends Cogn. Sci. 17: 287-294. DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2013.04.005.
Miklósi, Á., Kubinyi, E., Topál, J., Gácsi, M., Virányi, Z. & Csányi, V. (2003). A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do. — Curr. Biol. 13: 763-766.
Mota-Rojas, D., Lezama-García, K., Domínguez-Oliva, A., Olmos-Hernández, A., Verduzco-Mendoza, A., Casas-Alvarado, A., Torres-Bernal, F. & Martínez-Burnes, J. (2023). Neurobiology of emotions in animal relationships: facial expressions and their biological functions in mammals. — J. Anim. Behav. Biometeorol. 11: 2023ss01. DOI:10.31893/jabb.23ss01.
Nagasawa, M., Mitsui, S., En, S., Ohtani, N., Ohta, M., Sakuma, Y., Onaka, T., Mogi, K. & Kikusui, T. (2015). Social evolution. Oxytocin-gaze positive loop and the coevolution of human-dog bonds. — Science 348: 333-336. DOI:10.1126/science.1261022.
Nolfo, A.P., Casetta, G. & Palagi, E. (2022). Visual communication in social play of a hierarchical carnivore species: the case of wild spotted hyenas. — Curr. Zool. 68: 411-422. DOI:10.1093/cz/zoab076.
Oksanen, J., Simpson, G., Blanchet, F., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P., O’Hara, R., Solymos, P., Stevens, M., Szoecs, E., Wagner, H., Barbour, M., Bedward, M., Bolker, B., Borcard, D., Carvalho, G., Chirico, M., De Caceres, M., Durand, S., Evangelista, H., FitzJohn, R., Friendly, M., Furneaux, B., Hannigan, G., Hill, M., Lahti, L., McGlinn, D., Ouellette, M., Ribeiro Cunha, E., Smith, T., Stier, A., Ter Braak, C. & Weedon, J. (2024). vegan: community ecology package (R package version 2.6-6.1). Available online at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
Palagi, E., Nicotra, V. & Cordoni, G. (2015). Rapid mimicry and emotional contagion in domestic dogs. — Roy. Soc. Open Sci. 2: 150505. DOI:10.1098/rsos.150505.
Palagi, E., Marchi, E., Cavicchio, P. & Bandoli, F. (2019). Sharing playful mood: rapid facial mimicry in Suricata suricatta. — Anim. Cogn. 22: 719-732. DOI:10.1007/s10071-019-01269-y.
Parker, H.G., Dreger, D.L., Rimbault, M., Davis, B.W., Mullen, A.B., Carpintero-Ramirez, G. & Ostrander, E.A. (2017). Genomic Analyses Reveal the Influence of Geographic Origin, Migration, and Hybridization on Modern Dog Breed Development. — Cell. Rep. 19: 697-708. DOI:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.079.
Parker, H.G. & Ostrander, E.A. (2005). Canine genomics and genetics: running with the pack. — PLoS Genet. 1: e58. DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.0010058.
Range, F. & Marshall-Pescini, S. (2022). Comparing wolves and dogs: current status and implications for human ‘self-domestication’. — Trends Cogn. Sci. 26: 337-349. DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2022.01.003.
Rubio, A.O. & Summers, K. (2022). Neural crest cell genes and the domestication syndrome: a comparative analysis of selection. — PLoS ONE 17: e0263830.
Schatz, K.Z., Engelke, E. & Pfarrer, C. (2021). Comparative morphometric study of the mimic facial muscles of brachycephalic and dolichocephalic dogs. — Anat. Histol. Embryol. 50: 863-875. DOI:10.1111/ahe.12729.
Schmutz, S.M. & Berryere, T.G. (2007). Genes affecting coat colour and pattern in domestic dogs: a review. — Anim. Genet. 38: 539-549. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01664.x.
Schoenebeck, J.J., Hutchinson, S.A., Byers, A., Beale, H.C., Carrington, B., Faden, D.L., Rimbault, M., Decker, B., Kidd, J.M., Sood, R., Boyko, A.R., Fondon, J.W., Wayne, R.K., Bustamante, C.D., Ciruna, B. & Ostrander, E.A. (2012). Variation of BMP3 contributes to dog breed skull diversity. — PLoS Genet. 8: e1002849. DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002849.
Smetanová, M., Černá Bolfíková, B., Randi, E., Caniglia, R., Fabbri, E., Galaverni, M., Kutal, M. & Hulva, P. (2015). From wolves to dogs, and back: genetic composition of the Czechoslovakian Wolfdog. — PLoS ONE 10: e0143807. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0143807.
Smuts, B. (2014). Social behavior among companion dogs with an emphasis on play. — In: The social dog: behavior and cognition (Kaminski, J. & Marshall-Pescini, S., eds). Academic Press, New York, NY, p. 105-130.
Sommese, A., Nováková, K., Šebková, N.F. & Bartoš, L. (2019). A wolfdog point of view on the impossible task paradigm. — Anim. Cogn. 22: 1073-1083.
Taylor, D., Hartmann, D., Dezecache, G., Te Wong, S. & Davila-Ross, M. (2019). Facial complexity in sun bears: exact facial mimicry and social sensitivity. — Sci. Rep. 9: 4961. DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-39932-6.
Tinbergen, N. (1952). Derived’ activities; their causation, biological significance, origin, and emancipation during evolution. — Q. Rev. Biol 27: 1-32.
Waller, B.M., Peirce, K., Caeiro, C.C., Scheider, L., Burrows, A.M., McCune, S. & Kaminski, J. (2013). Paedomorphic facial expressions give dogs a selective advantage. — PLoS ONE 8: e82686. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0082686.
Wayne, R.K. & Ostrander, E.A. (2007). Lessons learned from the dog genome. — Trends Genet. 23: 557-567. DOI:10.1016/j.tig.2007.08.013.
Wilcox, B. & Walkowicz, C. (1995). Atlas of dog breeds of the World, 5th edn. — T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City, NJ.
Wilkins, A.S., Wrangham, R.W. & Fitch, W.T. (2014). The “domestication syndrome” in mammals: a unified explanation based on neural crest cell behavior and genetics. — Genetics 197: 795-808. DOI:10.1534/genetics.114.165423.
Yu, G. (2022). Data integration, manipulation and visualization of phylogenetic trees. — Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, NY. DOI:10.1201/9781003279242.
Zhang, Z., Khederzadeh, S. & Li, Y. (2020). Deciphering the puzzles of dog domestication. — Zool. Res. 41: 97-104. DOI:10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2020.002.
Zimmermann, B., Castro, A.N.C., Lendez, P.A., Carrica Illia, M., Carrica Illia, M.P., Teyseyre, A.R., Toloza, J.M., Ghezzi, M.D. & Mota-Rojas, D. (2024). Anatomical and functional basis of facial expressions and their relationship with emotions in horses. — Res. Vet. Sci. 180: 105418. DOI:10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105418.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 368 | 368 | 20 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 30 | 30 | 1 |
| PDF-Downloads | 71 | 71 | 2 |
Facial expressions are central to animal communication, yet the influence of domestication and selective breeding on their expression in dogs (Canis familiaris) remains poorly understood. This study examined the relaxed open mouth (ROM), a conserved playful signal, across 29 dog breeds and compared it with wolves (Canis lupus), using the Dog Facial Action Coding System (DogFACS) and functional clustering. Results showed that ROM execution varies across breeds and does not systematically reflect genetic relatedness to the wolf. Contrary to predictions, brachycephalic breeds did not recruit fewer muscles than meso- and dolichocephalic breeds, suggesting that skull morphology alone does not constrain ROM expression. The maximum number of action units (AUs) recruited (seven) was observed in wolves and several breeds (e.g., Basset Hound, German Shepherd, Poodle), while most other breeds recruited between four and six, indicating a general simplification of the signal in domestic dogs. Variation in ROM expression may influence intraspecific communication, with some breeds more readily interpreting one another’s facial cues. This study provides novel insights into the evolution of canine facial communication and offers a framework for comparative research across other species.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 368 | 368 | 20 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 30 | 30 | 1 |
| PDF-Downloads | 71 | 71 | 2 |