Sexually dimorphic ungulates often show differences in habitat use between sexes; however, information on seasonal changes in habitat use according to sex and the presence of offspring is scarce. This study aimed to clarify the seasonal differences in habitat use of sika deer (Cervus nippon) according to sex, age, and the presence of offspring in the highly seasonal habitats of the subalpine zone of Mount Fuji, Japan. Habitat use varied across seasons and substantial differences according to sex and the presence offspring were observed in summer. In summer, males frequently used habitats with abundant forage (forest edges). Conversely, while females without offspring frequently used habitats with abundant forage (forest edges) and safety (flat terrain), females with offspring preferred safer habitats (forest interior, areas far from mountain trails, and flat terrain) instead. These results revealed that males, females without fawns, and females with fawns prioritized food intake over safety, both food intake and safety, and safety, respectively. These patterns reflect differences in vulnerability to predation and in strategies to maximize reproductive success. The habitat use of females with fawns changed drastically from summer to autumn: in autumn, they prioritized not only safety but also food conditions, suggesting that their habitat use changed seasonally as vulnerability declined with fawn growth.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Barboza, P.S. & Bowyer, R.T. (2001). Seasonality of sexual segregation in dimorphic deer: extending the gastrocentric model. — Alces. 37: 275-292.
Bartoń, K. (2019). MuMIn: multi-model inference. R package version 1.43.6. — R Society for Staitstical Computing, Vienna, available online at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn (accessed 24 November 2024).
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. — J. Stat. Softw. 67: 1-48.
Bergerud, A.T. & Elliot, J.P. (1986). Dynamics of caribou and wolves in northern British Columbia. — Can. J. Zool. 64: 1515-1529. DOI:10.1139/z86-226.
Bleich, V.C., Bowyer, R.T. & Wehausen, J.D. (1997). Sexual segregation in mountain sheep: resource of predation? — Wildl. Monogr. 134: 1-50.
Borkowski, J. (2000). Influence of the density of a sika deer population on activity, habitat use, and group size. — Can. J. Zool. 78: 1369-1374. DOI:10.1139/z00-071.
Bowyer, R.T. (2004). Sexual segregation in ruminants: definitions, hypotheses, and implications for conservation and management. — J. Mammal. 85: 1039-1052. DOI:10.1644/BBL-002.1.
Bowyer, R.T. (2022). Differences between the sexes. — In: Sexual segregation in ungulates: ecology, behavior, and conservation. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, p. 297-317.
Burnham, K. & Anderson, D. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. — Springer, New York, NY.
Ciuti, S., Davini, S., Luccarini, S. & Apollonio, M. (2004). Could the predation risk hypothesis explain large-scale spatial sexual segregation in fallow deer (Dama dama)? — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 56: 552-564. DOI:10.1007/s00265-004-0819-0.
Côté, S.D. & Festa-Bianchet, M. (2001). Birthdate, mass and survival in mountain goat kids: effects of maternal characteristics and forage quality. — Oecologia 127: 230. DOI:10.1007/s004420000584.
Feldhamer, G.A. (1980). Cervus nippon. — Mamm. Spec. 128: 1-7. DOI:10.2307/3504044/2600227.
Hamada, T., Sugano, H. & Oka, S. (2000). The climatic environment near the tree line on the northwestern slope of Mt. Fuji. — Geogr. Rev. Jpn. 73: 435-447. (in Japanese).
Hay, C.T., Cross, P.C. & Funston, P.J. (2008). Trade-offs of predation and foraging explain sexual segregation in African buffalo. — J. Anim. Ecol. 77: 850-858. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01409.x.
Hiruma, M., Takada, H., Washida, A. & Koike, S. (2023). Dietary partitioning and competition between sika deer and Japanese serows in high elevation habitats. — Mamm. Res. 68: 305-315. DOI:10.1007/s13364-023-00683-5.
Igota, H., Sakuragi, M., Uno, H., Kaji, K., Kaneko, M., Akamatsu, R. & Maekawa, K. (2004). Seasonal migration patterns of female sika deer in eastern Hokkaido, Japan. — Ecol. Res. 19: 169-178. DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1703.2003.00621.x.
Iijima, H., Nagata, J., Izuno, A., Uchiyama, K., Akashi, N., Fujiki, D. & Kuriyama, T. (2023). Current sika deer effective population size is near to reaching its historically highest level in the Japanese archipelago by release from hunting rather than climate change and top predator extinction. — Holocene 33: 718-727. DOI:10.1177/09596836231157063.
Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) (2024). Normal values (monthly) at Mount Fuji weather station. — Japan Meteorological Agency, Tokyo, available online at https://www.data.jma.go.jp/obd/stats/etrn/view/nml_sfc_ym.php?block_no=47639&year=&month=&day=&view=p1 (accessed 10 March 2025).
Kamei, T., Takeda, K.I., Izumiyama, S. & Ohshima, K. (2010). The effect of hunting on the behavior and habitat utilization of sika deer (Cervus nippon). — Mamm. Stud. 35: 235-241. DOI:10.3106/041.035.0403.
Liang, Y.J., Kuo, H., Giordano, A.J. & Pei, K.J.C. (2020). Seasonal variation in herd composition of the Formosan sika deer (Cervus nippon taiouanus) in a forest-grassland mosaic habitat of southern Taiwan. — Global Ecol. Conserv. 24: e01283. DOI:10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01283.
Lingle, S., Pellis, S.M. & Wilson, W.F. (2005). Interspecific variation in antipredator behaviour leads to differential vulnerability of mule deer and white-tailed deer fawns early in life. — J. Anim. Ecol. 74: 1140-1149. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.01014.x.
Main, M.B., Weckerly, F.W. & Bleich, V.C. (1996). Sexual segregation in ungulates: new directions for research. — J. Mammal. 77: 449-461. DOI:10.2307/1382821.
Minami, M., Ohnishi, N., Higuchi, N., Okada, A. & Takatsuki, S. (2009a). Life-time reproductive success of female sika deer on Kinkazan Island, Northern Japan. — In: Sika deer biology and management of native and introduced populations (McCullough, D., Takatsuki, S. & Kaji, K., eds). Springer, New York, NY, p. 319-326.
Minami, M., Ohnishi, N., Okada, A. & Takatsuki, S. (2009b). Reproductive ecology of sika deer on Kinkazan Island, Northern Japan: reproductive success of males and multi-mating of females. — In: Sika deer biology and management of native and introduced populations (McCullough, D., Takatsuki, S. & Kaji, K., eds). Springer, New York, NY, p. 297-317.
Miura, S. (1984). Social behavior and territoriality in male sika deer (Cervus nippon Temminck 1838) during the rut. — Z. Tierpsychol. 64: 33-73. DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1984.tb00351.x.
Miura, S. (2023). Wildlife conservation and management. — In: A century of mammalogy in Japan (The Mammal Society of Japan, ed.). Buneido, Tokyo, p. 330-359. (in Japanese).
Nagaike, T. (2020). Bark stripping by deer was more intensive on new recruits than on advanced regenerants in a subalpine forest. — Forests 11: 490. DOI:10.3390/F11050490.
Nashimoto, M., Kobayashi, T. & Ishii, T. (2016). Altitudinal distribution of annual maximum snow depth and snow cover period in the subalpine zone of Mt. Fuji. — Seppyo 78: 127-141. (in Japanese).
Ohnishi, N., Minami, M., Nishiya, R., Yamada, K., Nishizuka, H., Higuchi, H., Nara, A., Suzuki, M. & Takatsuki, S. (2009). Reproduction of female sika deer in Japan, with special reference to Kinkazan Island, Northern Japan. — In: Sika deer biology and management of native and introduced populations (McCullough, D., Takatsuki, S. & Kaji, K., eds). Springer, New York, NY, p. 101-110.
Owen-Smith, N. (2008). Changing vulnerability to predation related to season and sex in an African ungulate assemblage. — Oikos 117: 602-610. DOI:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16309.x.
Padmalal, U. & Takatsuki, S. (1994). Age-sex differences in the diets of sika deer on Kinkazan Island, northern Japan. — Ecol. Res. 9: 251-256. DOI:10.1007/BF02348411.
Pettorelli, N., Pelletier, F., Von Hardenberg, A., Festa-Bianchet, M. & Côté, S.D. (2007). Early onset of vegetation growth vs. rapid green-up: impacts on juvenile mountain ungulates. — Ecology 88: 381. DOI:10.1890/06-0875.
R Core Team (2022). R: a language and environment for statistical com puting. — R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, available online at https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 21 November 2022).
Ruckstuhl, K.E. & Neuhaus, P. (2002). Sexual segregation in ungulates: a comparative test of three hypotheses. — Biol. Rev. 77: 77-96. DOI:10.1017/S1464793101005814.
Sakuragi, M., Igota, H., Uno, H., Kaji, K., Kaneko, M., Akamatsu, R. & Maekawa, K. (2003). Seasonal habitat selection of an expanding sika deer Cervus nippon population in eastern Hokkaido, Japan. — Wildl. Biol. 9: 141-153. DOI:10.2981/wlb.2003.036.
Soga, A., Hamasaki, S.I., Yokoyama, N., Sakai, T. & Kaji, K. (2015). Relationship between spatial distribution of sika deer-train collisions and sika deer movement in Japan. — Hum. Wildl. Interact. 9: 198-210.
Takada, H. & Nakamura, K. (2023). Overlap in habitat use and activity patterns between sika deer (Cervus nippon) and Japanese serows (Capricornis crispus) in subalpine habitats: exploitative competition rather than direct interference? — Can. J. Zool. 101: 980-990. DOI:10.1139/cjz-2023-0013.
Takada, H. & Nakamura, K. (2024). Effects of human harvesting, residences, and forage abundance on deer spatial distribution. — Animals 14: 1924. DOI:10.3390/ani14131924.
Takada, H. & Washida, A. (2020). Ecological drivers of group size variation in sika deer: habitat structure, population density, or both? — Mamm. Biol. 100: 445-452. DOI:10.1007/s42991-020-00041-x.
Takada, H., Ohuchi, R., Watanabe, H., Yano, R., Miyaoka, R., Nakagawa, T., Zenno, Y. & Minami, M. (2020). Habitat use and the coexistence of the sika deer and the Japanese serow, sympatric ungulates from Mt. Asama, central Japan. — Mammalia 84: 503-511. DOI:10.1515/mammalia-2019-0150.
Takada, H., Yano, R., Watanabe, H., Ohuchi, R., Kanno, T., Washida, A., Nakamura, K., Tezuka, N., Shimodoumae, D. & Minami, M. (2023). Behavioural interactions between sika deer and Japanese serows: are larger and gregarious ungulates dominant? — Behaviour 160: 661-681. DOI:10.1163/1568539X-bja10228.
Takatsuki, S., Hosoi, E. & Suzuki, K. (2024). Age-related changes in the body size and weight of sika deer (Cervus nippon): a comparison between northern and southern populations of Honshu, the main island of Japan. — Mamm. Stud. 49: 1-9. DOI:10.3106/ms2023-0079.
Takatsuki, S., Suzuki, K. & Higashi, H. (2000). Seasonal elevational movements of sika deer on Mt. Goyo, northern Japan. — Mamm. Stud. 25: 107-114. DOI:10.3106/mammalstudy.25.107.
Yokoyama, M. (2009). Biology of sika deer in Hyogo: characteristics of reproduction, food habits, growth, and condition. — In: Sika deer biology and management of native and introduced populations (McCullough, D., Takatsuki, S. & Kaji, K., eds). Springer, New York, NY, p. 193-205. DOI:10.1007/978-4-431-09429-6_14.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 646 | 411 | 19 |
| Full Text Views | 19 | 6 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 33 | 14 | 0 |
Sexually dimorphic ungulates often show differences in habitat use between sexes; however, information on seasonal changes in habitat use according to sex and the presence of offspring is scarce. This study aimed to clarify the seasonal differences in habitat use of sika deer (Cervus nippon) according to sex, age, and the presence of offspring in the highly seasonal habitats of the subalpine zone of Mount Fuji, Japan. Habitat use varied across seasons and substantial differences according to sex and the presence offspring were observed in summer. In summer, males frequently used habitats with abundant forage (forest edges). Conversely, while females without offspring frequently used habitats with abundant forage (forest edges) and safety (flat terrain), females with offspring preferred safer habitats (forest interior, areas far from mountain trails, and flat terrain) instead. These results revealed that males, females without fawns, and females with fawns prioritized food intake over safety, both food intake and safety, and safety, respectively. These patterns reflect differences in vulnerability to predation and in strategies to maximize reproductive success. The habitat use of females with fawns changed drastically from summer to autumn: in autumn, they prioritized not only safety but also food conditions, suggesting that their habitat use changed seasonally as vulnerability declined with fawn growth.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 646 | 411 | 19 |
| Full Text Views | 19 | 6 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 33 | 14 | 0 |