When the penny drops: sharks outsmart cichlids in serial reversal learning
In: BehaviourSearch for other papers by V. Schluessel in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by V. Leo in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by M. Bawolt in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by N. Kreuter in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Two species of fish were tested in a serial reversal learning task using two dimensional objects varying in colour and/or form. After reaching the learning criterion (LC) in the original discrimination task, individuals reversed for up to ten times, i.e., stimulus association was switched and animals rewarded for choosing the stimulus that had not been rewarded in the previous learning phase. This was conducted using the two stimuli green diamond (S+) vs. red square (S−) for the training of eight cichlids, and black star (S+) vs. black circle (S−) for the training of seven bamboo sharks. All fifteen animals completed the initial training phase and reversed successfully at least three times, indicating an ability to forsake a previously learned stimulus association in favour of a new one. Sharks, but not cichlids, also showed a decrease in the number of sessions needed to reach LC with an increase in the number of reversals conducted, showing that some sort of learning strategy, i.e., rule learning, had been applied. Animals that improve their performance within such learning paradigms are considered to possess more behavioural flexibility and advanced cognitive abilities than those who do not. More flexibility could specifically aid species living in complex habitats, social groups and subjected to changing environmental conditions.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Behrend, E.R. & Bitterman, M.E. (1967). Further experiments on habit reversal in the fish. — Psychonom. Sci. 8: 363-364.
-
Beran, M.J., Klein, E.D. & Evans, T.A. (2008). Discrimination reversal learning in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). — Psychol. Rec. 58: 3-14.
-
Bessemer, D.W. & Stollnitz, F. (1971). Retention of discriminations and an analysis of learning set. — In: Behavior of nonhuman primates, Vol. 4 (Schrier, A.M. & Stollnitz, F., eds). Academic Press, New York, NY, p. 1-58.
-
Bissonette, G.B. & Powell, E.M. (2012). Reversal learning and attentional set-shifting in mice. — Neuropharmacology 62: 1168-1174.
-
Bitterman, M.E. (1965). Phyletic differences in learning. — Am. Psychol. 20: 396-410.
-
Bond, A.B., Kamil, A. & Balda, R.P. (2007). Serial reversal learning and the evolution of behavioral flexibility in three species of North American corvids (Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus, Nucifraga columbiana, Aphelocoma californica). — J. Comp. Psychol. 121: 372-379.
-
Bridgeman, J.M. & Tattersall, G.J. (2019). Tortoises develop and overcome position biases in a reversal learning task. — Anim. Cogn. 22: 265-275.
-
Brigman, J.L., Bussey, T.J., Saksida, L.M. & Rothblat, L.A. (2005). Discrimination of multidimensional visual stimuli by mice: intra-and extradimensional shifts. — Behav. Neurosci. 119: 839-842.
-
Brookshire, K.H., Warren, J.M. & Ball, G.G. (1961). Reversal and transfer learning following overtraining in rat and chicken. — J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 54: 98.
-
Brown, C. & Schluessel, V. (2023). Smart sharks: a review of chondrichthyan cognition. — Anim. Cogn. 26: 175-188.
-
Bublitz, A., Weinhold, S.R., Strobel, S., Dehnhardt, G. & Hanke, F.D. (2017). Reconsideration of serial visual reversal learning in octopus (Octopus vulgaris) from a methodological perspective. — Front. Physiol. 8: 54.
-
Bussey, T.J., Muir, J.L., Everitt, B.J. & Robbins, T.W. (1997). Triple dissociation of anterior cingulate, posterior cingulate, and medial frontal cortices on visual discrimination tasks using a touchscreen testing procedure for the rat. — Behav. Neurosci. 111: 920-936.
-
Butter, C.M. (1969). Perseveration in extinction and in discrimination reversal tasks following selective frontal ablations in Macaca mulatta. — Physiol. Behav. 4: 163-171.
-
Byrnes, E.E. & Brown, C. (2016). Individual personality differences in Port Jackson sharks Heterodontus portusjacksoni. — J. Fish. Biol. 89: 1142-1157.
-
Capretta, P.J. & Rea, R. (1967). Discrimination reversal learning in crayfish. — Anim. Behav. 15: 6-7.
-
Carere, C. & Locurto, C. (2011). Interaction between animal personality and animal cognition. — Curr. Zool. 57: 491-498.
-
Chudasama, Y. & Robbins, T.W. (2003). Dissociable contributions of the orbitofrontal and infralimbic cortex to pavlovian autoshaping and discrimination reversal learning: further evidence for the functional heterogeneity of the rodent frontal cortex. — J. Neurosci. 23: 8771-8780.
-
Compagno, L.J.V., Dando, M. & Fowler, S. (2005). A field guide to the sharks of the world. — Harper Collins, London.
-
Daniel, M. & Schluessel, V. (2020). Serial reversal learning in freshwater stingrays (Potamotrygon motoro). — Anim. Cogn. 23: 109-119.
-
Datta, L.E.G., Milstein, S. & Bitterman, M.E. (1960). Habit reversal in the crab. — J. Comp. Phys. Psychol. 53: 275-278.
-
Day, L., Crews, D. & Wilczynski, W. (1999). Spatial and reversal learning in congeneric lizards with different foraging strategies. — Anim. Behav. 57: 393-407.
-
de Waal, F.B.M. & Tyack, P.L. (2003). Animal social complexity: intelligence, culture, and individualized societies. — Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
-
Degrande, R., Cornilleau, F., Lansade, L., Jardat, P., Colson, V. & Calandreau, L. (2022). Domestic hens succeed at serial reversal learning and perceptual concept generalisation using a new automated touchscreen device. — Animal 16: 100607.
-
Engelhardt, F., Woodard, W.T. & Bitterman, M.E. (1973). Discrimination reversal in the goldfish as a function of training conditions. — J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 85: 144-150.
-
Floresco, S. & Jentsch, J. (2011). Pharmacological enhancement of memory and executive functioning in laboratory animals. — Neuropsychopharmacology 36: 227-250.
-
Fuss, T., Bleckmann, H. & Schluessel, V. (2014). Visual discrimination abilities in the gray bamboo shark (Chiloscyllium griseum). — Zoology 117: 104-111.
-
Fuss, T. & Witte, K. (2019). Sex differences in color discrimination and serial reversal learning in mollies and guppies. — Curr. Zool. 65: 323-332.
-
Gaalema, D.E. (2011). Visual discrimination and reversal learning in rough-necked monitor lizards (Varanus rudicollis). — J. Comp. Psychol. 125: 246-249.
-
Gonzalez, R.C., Behrend, E.R. & Bitterman, M.E. (1967). Reversal learning and forgetting in bird and fish. — Science. 158: 519-521.
-
Henrichfreise, G. & Ducker, G. (1983). Comparative investigations on serial reversal discrimination learning in fish (Carassius auratus L, Cyrinus carpio L, Salmo gairdner Richardson). — Zool. Anz. 211: 197-213.
-
Hervig, M.E., Fiddian, L., Piilgaard, L., Božič, T., Blanco-Pozo, M., Knudsen, C. & Robbins, T. (2020). Dissociable and paradoxical roles of rat medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex in visual serial reversal learning. — Cereb. Cortex 30: 1016-1029.
-
Holmes, P.A. & Bitterman, M.E. (1966). Spatial and visual habit reversal in the turtle. — J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 62: 328-331.
-
Izquierdo, A., Brigman, J.L., Radke, A.K., Rudebeck, P.H. & Holmes, A. (2017). The neural basis of reversal learning: an updated perspective. — Neuroscience 345: 12-26.
-
Laland, K.N. & Reader, S.M. (1999). Foraging innovation in the guppy. — Anim. Behav. 57: 331-340.
-
Lawrence, D.H. & Mason, W.A. (1955). Systematic behavior during discrimination reversal and change of dimensions. — J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 48: 1-7.
-
Liu, Y., Day, L.B., Summers, K. & Burmeister, S.S. (2016). Learning to learn: advanced behavioural flexibility in a poison frog. — Anim. Behav. 111: 167-172.
-
López, J.C., Broglio, C., Rodríguez, F., Thinus-Blanc, C. & Salas, C. (2000). Reversal learning deficit in a spatial task but not in a cued one after telencephalic ablation in goldfish. — Behav. Brain Res. 109: 91-98.
-
Lucon-Xiccato, T. & Bisazza, A. (2014). Discrimination reversal learning reveals greater female behavioral flexibility in guppies. — Biol. Lett. 10: 20140206.
-
Mackintosh, N.J., McGonigle, B., Holgate, V. & Vanderver, V. (1968). Factors underlying improvement in serial reversal learning. — Can. J. Psychol. 22: 85-95.
-
Mackintosh, N.J. & Cauty, A. (1971). Spatial reversal learning in rats, pigeons, and goldfish. — Psychon. Sci. 22: 281-282.
-
Macphail, E.M. (1982). Brain and intelligence in vertebrates. — Clarendon Press, Oxford.
-
Mather, J.A. & Anderson, R.C. (1993). Personalities of octopuses (Octopus rubescens). — J. Comp. Psychol. 107: 336-340.
-
Mattioli, R., Santangelo, E.M., Costa, A.C.C. & Vasconcelos, L. (1997). Substance P facilitates memory in goldfish in an appetitively motivated learning task. — Behav. Brain Res. 85: 117-120.
-
Meineke, H. (1978). Reversal-learning of honey bees for yellow and blue in endurance tests. — J. Insect Physiol. 24: 155-163.
-
Morrow, J.O. & Smithson, B.L. (1969). Learning sets in an invertebrate. — Science 164: 850-851.
-
Parker, A. & Kornfield, I. (1996). Polygynandry in Pseudotropheus zebra, a cichlid fish from lake Malawi. — Environ. Biol. Fish 47: 345-352.
-
Parker, M.O., Gaviria, J., Haigh, A., Millington, M.E., Brown, V.J., Combe, F.J. & Brennan, C.H. (2012). Discrimination reversal and attention sets in zebrafish (Danio rerio). — Behav. Brain Res. 232: 264-268.
-
Petrazzini, M.E., Bisazza, A., Agrillo, C. & Lucon-Xiccato, T. (2017). Sex differences in discrimination reversal learning in the guppy. — Anim. Cogn. 20: 1081-1091.
-
Roth, G. & Dicke, U. (2005). Evolution of the brain and intelligence. — Trends Cogn. Sci. 9: 250-257.
-
Schluessel, V. (2015). Who would have thought that ‘jaws’ also has brains? Cognitive functions in elasmobranchs. — Anim. Cogn. 18: 19-37.
-
Schluessel, V. & Bleckmann, H. (2005). Spatial memory and orientation strategies in the elasmobranch Potamotrygon motoro. — J. Comp. Physiol. 191: 695-706.
-
Schluessel, V. & Ober, C. (2018). How to get out of a maze? Stingrays (Potamotrygon motoro) use directional over landmark information when provided with both in a spatial task. — Evol. Ecol. Res. 19: 619-637.
-
Schluessel, V., Fricke, G. & Bleckmann, H. (2012). Visual discrimination and object categorization in the cichlid Pseudotropheus sp. — Anim. Cogn. 15: 525-537.
-
Schluessel, V., Rick, I.P. & Plischke, K. (2014). No rainbow for grey bamboo sharks: evidence for the absence of colour vision in sharks from behavioural discrimination experiments. — J. Comp. Physiol. A. 200: 939-947.
-
Schluessel, V., Kreuter, N., Gosemann, I. & Schmidt, E. (2022). Cichlids and stingrays can add and subtract ‘one’ in the number space from one to five. — Sci. Rep. 12: 3894.
-
Seidman, E. (1949). Relative ability of the newt and the terrapin to reverse a direction habit. — J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 42: 320-327.
-
Shettleworth, S.J. (1998). Cognition, evolution, and behavior. — Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
-
Shettleworth, S.J. (2010). Cognition, evolution, and behavior, 2nd edn. — Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
-
Squier, L. (1969). Reversal learning improvement in the fish, Astronotus ocellatus (Oscar). — Psychol. Sci. 14: 143-144.
-
Strang, C.G. & Sherry, D.F. (2014). Serial reversal learning in bumblebees (Bombus impatiens). — Anim. Cogn. 17: 723-734.
-
Thompson, R. (1957). Successive reversal of a position habit in an invertebrate. — Science 126: 163-164.
-
Tomasello, M. & Call, J. (1997). Primate cognition. — Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
-
van Horik, J.O. & Emery, N.J. (2018). Serial reversal learning and cognitive flexibility in two species of Neotropical parrots (Diopsittaca nobilis and Pionites melanocephala). — Behav. Proc. 157: 664-672.
-
Warren, J.M. (1960). Reversal learning by paradise fish (Macropodus opercularis). — J. Comp. Phys. Psychol. 53: 376-378.
-
Warren, J.M. & Warren, H.B. (1962). Reversal learning by horse and raccoon. — J. Gen. Psychol. 100: 215-220.
-
Warren, J.M., Brookshire, K.H., Ball, G.G. & Reynolds, D.V. (1960). Reversal learning by white leghorn chicks. — J. Comp. Phys. Psychol. 53: 371-375.
-
Wells, M.C. & Lehner, P.N. (1977). Serial reversal learning in the mallard duck (Anas platyrhynchos). — Bull. Psychon. Soc. 10: 235-237.
-
Young, J.Z. (1962). Repeated reversal of training in octopus. — Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 14: 206-222.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 997 | 208 | 15 |
| Full Text Views | 48 | 4 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 97 | 11 | 0 |
When the penny drops: sharks outsmart cichlids in serial reversal learning
In: BehaviourSearch for other papers by V. Schluessel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by V. Leo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M. Bawolt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N. Kreuter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Two species of fish were tested in a serial reversal learning task using two dimensional objects varying in colour and/or form. After reaching the learning criterion (LC) in the original discrimination task, individuals reversed for up to ten times, i.e., stimulus association was switched and animals rewarded for choosing the stimulus that had not been rewarded in the previous learning phase. This was conducted using the two stimuli green diamond (S+) vs. red square (S−) for the training of eight cichlids, and black star (S+) vs. black circle (S−) for the training of seven bamboo sharks. All fifteen animals completed the initial training phase and reversed successfully at least three times, indicating an ability to forsake a previously learned stimulus association in favour of a new one. Sharks, but not cichlids, also showed a decrease in the number of sessions needed to reach LC with an increase in the number of reversals conducted, showing that some sort of learning strategy, i.e., rule learning, had been applied. Animals that improve their performance within such learning paradigms are considered to possess more behavioural flexibility and advanced cognitive abilities than those who do not. More flexibility could specifically aid species living in complex habitats, social groups and subjected to changing environmental conditions.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 997 | 208 | 15 |
| Full Text Views | 48 | 4 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 97 | 11 | 0 |
