Animals that exploit resources from human-modified environments may encounter unique problems when searching for food. Pulling a string tied to a food reward (string-pulling task) is one of the most widespread methods of testing a speciesâ problem-solving performance in non-human animals. Performance in problem-solving tasks may be influenced by an individualâs characteristics and social interactions, especially in its natural habitat. We examined problem solving by free-ranging Stellerâs jays (Cyanocitta stelleri) when extracting food from a string-pulling task presented in their natural habitat. During the study, seven of 50 jays successfully solved the task on their first to eighteenth experimental opportunity; solvers differed from nonsolvers by showing higher levels of persistence by pulling the string in more trials. Of the successful jays, five birds solved without observing others, while two birds were present during successful trials and subsequently completed the task. All seven jays demonstrated improvement in the task by using less string pulls over additional successful trials. Nineteen other jays in the population interacted with the apparatus and pulled the string, but not enough to acquire the food. These 19 jays were significantly bolder (shorter latencies to approach), more explorative (contacted more parts of the apparatus), and had observed solvers more than the 24 individuals that did not pull the string. These results indicate a broad spectrum of individual differences in propensity for solving novel tasks in our population of Stellerâs jays.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Aplin, L.M., Farine, D.R., Morand-Ferron, J., Cockburn, A., Thornton, A. & Sheldon, B.C. (2015). Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds. â Nature 518: 528-541.
Aplin, L.M., Sheldon, B.C. & Morand-Ferron, J. (2013). Milk bottles revisited: social learning and individual variation in the blue tit, Cyanistes caeruleus. â Anim. Behav. 85: 1225-1232.
Ashton, B.J., Thornton, A. & Ridley, A.R. (2019). Larger group sizes facilitate the emergence and spread of innovations in a group-living bird. â Anim. Behav. 158: 1-7.
Auersperg, A.M.I., Szabo, B., von Bayern, A.M.P. & Kacelnik, A. (2012). Spontaneous innovation in tool manufacture and use in Goffinâs cockatoo. â Curr. Biol. 22: 903-904.
Benson-Amram, S. & Holekamp, K.E. (2012). Innovative problem solving by wild spotted hyenas. â Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 279: 4087-4095.
Brand, L.A. & George, T.L. (2001). Response of passerine birds to forest edge in coast redwood forest fragments. â Auk 118: 678-686.
Brown, J.L. (1963). Aggressiveness, dominance and social organization in the Steller jay. â Condor 65: 460-484.
Cadieu, N., Fruchard, S. & Cadieu, J.-C. (2010). Innovative individuals are not always the best demonstrators: feeding innovation and social transmission in Serinus canaria. â PLoS ONE 5: e8841.
Cauchard, L., Angers, B., Boogert, N.J., Lenarth, M., Bize, P. & Doligez, B. (2017). An experimental test of a causal link between problem-solving performance and reproductive success in wild great tits. â Front. Ecol. Evol. 5: 107.
Cauchard, L., Boogert, N.J., Lefebvre, L., Dubois, F. & Doligez, B. (2013). Problem-solving performance is correlated with reproductive success in a wild bird population. â Anim. Behav. 85: 19-26.
Chow, P.K.Y., Lea, S.E.G. & Leaver, L.A. (2016). How practice makes perfect: the role of persistence, flexibility and learning in problem-solving efficiency. â Anim. Behav. 112: 273-283.
Clayton, N. & Emery, N. (2005). Corvid cognition. â Curr. Biol. 15: R80-R81.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. â L. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Colbert-White, E.N., McCord, E.M., Sharpe, D.I. & Fragaszy, D.M. (2013). String-pulling behaviour in a Harrisâs Hawk Parabuteo unicinctus. â Ibis 155: 611-615.
Cole, E.F., Cram, D.L. & Quinn, J.L. (2011). Individual variation in spontaneous problem-solving performance among wild great tits. â Anim. Behav. 81: 491-498.
Cole, E.F. & Quinn, J.L. (2011). Personality and problem-solving performance explain competitive ability in the wild. â Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 279: 1168-1175.
Day, R.L., Coe, R.L., Kendal, J.R. & Laland, K.N. (2003). Neophilia, innovation and social learning: a study of intergeneric differences in callitrichid monkeys. â Anim. Behav. 65: 559-571.
Dingemanse, N.J., Both, C., Drent, P.J., van Oers, K. & van Noordwijk, A.J. (2002). Repeatability and heritability of exploratory behaviour in great tits from the wild. â Anim. Behav. 64: 929-938.
Elgar, M.A. (1989). Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence. â Biol. Rev. 64: 13-33.
Ellison, A.M., Watson, J. & Demers, E. (2015). Testing problem solving in Turkey vultures (Cathartes aura) using the string-pulling test. â Anim. Cogn. 18: 111-118.
Ericson, P.G.P., Jansén, A.-L., Johansson, U.S. & Ekman, J. (2005). Inter-generic relationships of the crows, jays, magpies and allied groups (Aves: Corvidae) based on nucleotide sequence data. â J. Avian Biol. 36: 222-234.
Federspiel, I.G., Boeckle, M., von Bayern, A.M.P. & Emery, N.J. (2019). Exploring individual and social learning in jackdaws (Corvus monedula). â Learn. Behav. 47: 258-270.
Fritz, J. & Kotrschal, K. (1999). Social learning in common ravens, Corvus corax. â Anim. Behav. 57: 785-793.
Gabriel, P.O. & Black, J.M. (2010). Behavioural syndromes in Stellerâs jays: the role of time frames in the assessment of behavioural traits. â Anim. Behav. 80: 689-697.
Gabriel, P.O. & Black, J.M. (2012). Behavioural syndromes, partner compatibility and reproductive performance in Stellerâs jays. â Ethology 118: 76-86.
Garamszegi, L.Z. (2006). Comparing effect sizes across variables: generalization without the need for Bonferroni correction. â Behav. Ecol. 17: 682-687.
Garamszegi, L.Z., Erritzøe, J. & Møller, A.P. (2007). Feeding innovations and parasitism in birds. â Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 90: 441-455.
Gaycken, J., Picken, D.J., Pike, T.W., Burman, O.H.P. & Wilkinson, A. (2019). Mechanisms underlying string-pulling behaviour in green-winged macaws. â Behaviour 156: 619-631.
Greene, E., Davison, W. & Muehter, V.R. (1998). Stellerâs jay (Cyanocitta stelleri). â In: The birds of North America. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, p. 20.
Griffin, A.S., Diquelou, M. & Perea, M. (2014). Innovative problem solving in birds: a key role of motor diversity. â Anim. Behav. 92: 221-227.
Griffin, A.S. & Guez, D. (2014). Innovation and problem solving: a review of common mechanisms. â Behav. Proc. 109: 121-134.
Griffin, A.S. & Guez, D. (2015). Innovative problem solving in nonhuman animals: the effects of group size revisited. â Behav. Ecol. 26: 722-734.
Heinrich, B. (1995). An experimental investigation of insight in common ravens (Corvus corax). â Auk 112: 994-1003.
Heinrich, B. & Bugnyar, T. (2005). Testing problem solving in ravens: string-pulling to reach food. â Ethology 111: 962-976.
Heinrich, B. & Pepper, J.W. (1998). Influence on caching behaviour in the presence of competitors in the common raven, Corvus corax. â Anim. Behav. 56: 1083-1090.
Hofmann, M.M., Cheke, L.G. & Clayton, N.S. (2016). Western scrub-jays (Aphelocoma californica) solve multiple-string problems by the spatial relation of string and reward. â Anim. Cogn. 19: 1103-1114.
Holzhaider, J.C., Hunt, G.R. & Gray, R.D. (2010). Social learning in New Caledonian crows. â Learning & Behavior 38: 206-219.
Hope, S. (1980). Call form in relation to function in the Stellerâs jay. â Am. Nat. 116: 788-820.
Jacobs, I. (2017). On the origins of physical cognition in corvids. â Doctoral dissertation, Lund University, Lund.
Jacobs, I. (2018). String pulling. â In: Encyclopedia of animal cognition and behavior (Vonk, J. & Shackelford, T., eds). Springer International Publishing, Cham, p. 1-8.
Jacobs, I.F. & Osvath, M. (2015). The string-pulling paradigm in comparative psychology. â J. Comp. Psychol. 129: 89-120.
Jolles, J.W., OstojiÄ, L. & Clayton, N.S. (2013). Dominance, pair bonds and boldness determine social-foraging tactics in rooks, Corvus frugilegus. â Anim. Behav. 85: 1261-1269.
Jones, T.B. & Kamil, A.C. (1973). Tool-making and tool-using in the northern blue jay. â Science 180: 1076-1078.
Kalinowski, R.S., Gabriel, P.O. & Black, J.M. (2015). Whoâs watching influences caching effort in wild Stellerâs jays (Cyanocitta stelleri). â Anim. Cogn. 18: 95-98.
Keagy, J., Savard, J.-F. & Borgia, G. (2009). Male satin bowerbird problem-solving ability predicts mating success. â Anim. Behav. 78: 809-817.
Kummer, H. & Goodall, J. (1985). Conditions of innovative behavior in primates. â Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 308: 203-214.
LaBarbera, M. (1989). Analyzing body size as a factor in ecology and evolution. â Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 97-117.
Liker, A. & Bókony, V. (2009). Larger groups are more successful in innovative problem solving in house sparrows. â Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 7893-7898.
Manrique, H.M., Molina, A.-B.C., Posada, S. & Colell, M. (2017). Vertical string-pulling in green jays (Cyanocorax yncas). â Behav. Proc. 140: 74-80.
Marzluff, J.M. & Angell, T. (2005). In the company of crows and ravens. â Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Marzluff, J.M., Millspaugh, J.J., Hurvitz, P. & Handcock, M.S. (2004). Relating resources to a probabilistic measure of space use: forest fragments and Stellerâs jays. â Ecology 85: 1411-1427.
McCune, K.B., Jablonski, P., Lee, S. & Ha, R.R. (2019). Captive jays exhibit reduced problem-solving performance compared to wild conspecifics. â Roy. Soc. Open Sci. 6: 181311.
McLean, A.N. (2001). Cognitive abilities â the result of selective pressures on food acquisition? â Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 71: 241-258.
Morand-Ferron, J., Cole, E.F., Rawles, J.E.C. & Quinn, J.L. (2011). Who are the innovators? A field experiment with 2 passerine species. â Behav. Ecol. 22: 1241-1248.
Morand-Ferron, J. & Quinn, J.L. (2011). Larger groups of passerines are more efficient problem solvers in the wild. â Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108: 15898-15903.
Morand-Ferron, J., Cole, E.F. & Quinn, J.L. (2015). Studying the evolutionary ecology of cognition in the wild: a review of practical and conceptual challenges. â Biol. Rev. 91: 367-389.
Nakagawa, S. (2004). A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias. â Behav. Ecol. 15: 1044-1045.
Nakagawa, S. & Cuthill, I.C. (2007). Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. â Biol. Rev. 82: 591-605.
Overington, S.E., Cauchard, L., Côté, K.-A. & Lefebvre, L. (2011). Innovative foraging behaviour in birds: what characterizes an innovator? â Behav. Proc. 87: 274-285.
Overington, S.E., Cauchard, L., Morand-Ferron, J. & Lefebvre, L. (2009). Innovation in groups: does the proximity of others facilitate or inhibit performance? â Behaviour 146: 1543-1564.
Overington, S.E., Dubois, F. & Lefebvre, L. (2008). Food unpredictability drives both generalism and social foraging: a game theoretical model. â Behav. Ecol. 19: 836-841.
Pendergraft, L.T., Lehnert, A.L. & Marzluff, J.M. (2020). Individual and social factors affecting the ability of American crows to solve and master a string pulling task. â Ethology 126: 229-245.
Pepperberg, I.M. (2004). âinsightfulâ string-pulling in grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) is affected by vocal competence. â Anim. Cogn. 7: 263-266.
Pritchard, D.J., Hurly, T.A., Tello-Ramos, M.C. & Healy, S.D. (2016). Why study cognition in the wild (and how to test it)? â J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 105: 41-55.
Pyle, P., Howell, S.N.G., Yunick, R.P. & DeSante, D.F. (1987). Identification guide to North American passerines, 1st edn. â Slate Creek Press, Bolinas, CA.
Reader, S.M. & Laland, K.N. (eds) (2003). Animal innovation. â Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Reader, S.M., Morand-Ferron, J. & Flynn, E. (2016). Animal and human innovation: novel problems and novel solutions. â Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 371: 20150182.
Rockwell, C., Gabriel, P.O. & Black, J.M. (2012). Bolder, older, and selective: factors of individual-specific foraging behaviors in Stellerâs jays. â Behav. Ecol. 23: 676-683.
Rockwell, C., Gabriel, P.O. & Black, J.M. (2013). Foraging dynamics in Stellerâs jays: size and viability of cacheable food items. â Anim. Behav. 86: 783-789.
Seibt, U. & Wickler, W. (2006). Individuality in problem solving: string pulling in two Carduelis species (Aves: Passeriformes). â Ethology 112: 493-502.
Sih, A., Ferrari, M.C.O. & Harris, D.J. (2011). Evolution and behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change. â Evol. Appl. 4: 367-387.
Sol, D., Griffin, A.S., Bartomeus, I. & Boyce, H. (2011). Exploring or avoiding novel food resources? The novelty conflict in an invasive bird. â PLoS ONE 6: e19535.
Sol, D., Timmermans, S. & Lefebvre, L. (2002). Behavioural flexibility and invasion success in birds. â Anim. Behav. 63: 495-502.
Stöwe, M., Bugnyar, T., Heinrich, B. & Kotrschal, K. (2006). Effects of group size on approach to novel objects in ravens (Corvus corax). â Ethology 112: 1079-1088.
Taylor, A.H., Medina, F.S., Holzhaider, J.C., Hearne, L.J., Hunt, G.R. & Gray, R.D. (2010). An investigation into the cognition behind spontaneous string pulling in New Caledonian crows. â PLoS ONE 5: e9345.
Tebbich, S., Sterelny, K. & Teschke, I. (2010). The tale of the finch: adaptive radiation and behavioural flexibility. â Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 365: 1099-1109.
Templeton, J.J., Kamil, A.C. & Balda, R.P. (1999). Sociality and social learning in two species of corvids: the pinyon jay (Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus) and the Clarkâs nutcracker (Nucifraga columbiana). â J. Comp. Psychol. 113: 450-455.
Thornton, A. & Samson, J. (2012). Innovative problem solving in wild meerkats. â Anim. Behav. 83: 1459-1468.
Torres Ortiz, S., Maxwell, A., Krasheninnikova, A., Wahlberg, M. & Larsen, O.N. (2019). Problem solving capabilities of peach-fronted conures (Eupsittula aurea) studied with the string-pulling test. â Behaviour 19: 1-32.
Turner, A.M., Turner, S.E. & Lappi, H.M. (2006). Learning, memory and predator avoidance by freshwater snails: effects of experience on predator recognition and defensive strategy. â Anim. Behav. 72: 1443-1450.
van Oers, K., Klunder, M. & Drent, P.J. (2005). Context dependence of personalities: risk-taking behavior in a social and a nonsocial situation. â Behav. Ecol. 16: 716-723.
Vince, M.A. (1956). String-pulling in birds. I. Individual differences in wild adult great tits. â Brit. J. Anim. Behav. 4: 111-116.
Vince, M.A. (1958). String-pulling in birds. II. Differences related to age in greenfinches, chaffinches and canaries. â Anim. Behav. 6: 53-59.
Vince, M.A. (1961). String-pulling in birds. III. The successful response in greenfinches and canaries. â Behaviour 17: 103-129.
Wang, L., Guo, J., Tian, H.-j. & Sui, J. (2020). The ability of oriental magpies (Pica serica) to solve baited multiple-string problems. â PeerJ 8: e9200.
Wang, L., Luo, Y., Wang, X., Maierdiyali, A., Chang, H. & Li, Z. (2019). Azure-winged magpies solve string-pulling tasks by partial understanding of the physical cognition. â Curr. Zool. 65: 385-392.
Wanker, R. & Krasheninnikova, A. (2010). String-pulling in spectacled parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus). â Behaviour 147: 725-739.
Webster, S.J. & Lefebvre, L. (2001). Problem solving and neophobia in a columbiform-passeriform assemblage in Barbados. â Anim. Behav. 62: 23-32.
Wright, T.F., Eberhard, J.R., Hobson, E.A., Avery, M.L. & Russello, M.A. (2010). Behavioral flexibility and species invasions: the adaptive flexibility hypothesis. â Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 22: 393-404.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1378 | 246 | 15 |
| Full Text Views | 125 | 24 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 200 | 28 | 0 |
Animals that exploit resources from human-modified environments may encounter unique problems when searching for food. Pulling a string tied to a food reward (string-pulling task) is one of the most widespread methods of testing a speciesâ problem-solving performance in non-human animals. Performance in problem-solving tasks may be influenced by an individualâs characteristics and social interactions, especially in its natural habitat. We examined problem solving by free-ranging Stellerâs jays (Cyanocitta stelleri) when extracting food from a string-pulling task presented in their natural habitat. During the study, seven of 50 jays successfully solved the task on their first to eighteenth experimental opportunity; solvers differed from nonsolvers by showing higher levels of persistence by pulling the string in more trials. Of the successful jays, five birds solved without observing others, while two birds were present during successful trials and subsequently completed the task. All seven jays demonstrated improvement in the task by using less string pulls over additional successful trials. Nineteen other jays in the population interacted with the apparatus and pulled the string, but not enough to acquire the food. These 19 jays were significantly bolder (shorter latencies to approach), more explorative (contacted more parts of the apparatus), and had observed solvers more than the 24 individuals that did not pull the string. These results indicate a broad spectrum of individual differences in propensity for solving novel tasks in our population of Stellerâs jays.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1378 | 246 | 15 |
| Full Text Views | 125 | 24 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 200 | 28 | 0 |