Reluctant males: why blue monkey males reject female sexual advances
In: BehaviourSearch for other papers by Sofia Schembari in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Marina Cords in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Classical sexual selection theory predicts that males should mate eagerly, yet blue monkey males often reject females’ sexual invitations. We evaluated how males’ responses to female solicitations related to female characteristics, number of males and conceptive females present, and the male’s recent copulations. Using 12 years of data from a wild population, we found that males accepted only 20% of female solicitations. Odds of acceptance (copulation) increased for conceptive females, for females with whom the male copulated recently, and when fewer males were present. Odds of accepting nulliparous females decreased when more conceptive females were available, consistent with market models. Male responses did not relate to female rank or matings with other females the same day. When males responded negatively, nulliparous females were especially likely to receive aggression vs. mere refusal. Overall, males’ decisions to mate with willing females depended both on female characteristics, especially fertility, and on social context.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Alberts, S.C. (2012). Male reproductive performance. — In: The evolution of primate societies (Mitani, J.C., Call, J., Kappeler, P.M., Palombit, R.A. & Silk, J.B., eds). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, p. 412-431.
-
Alberts, S.C., Altmann, J. & Wilson, M.L. (1996). Mate guarding constrains foraging activity of male baboons. — Anim. Behav. 51: 1269-1277.
-
Alberts, S.C., Buchan, J.C. & Altmann, J. (2006). Sexual selection in wild baboons: from mating opportunities to paternity success. — Anim. Behav. 72: 1177-1196.
-
Alfaro, J.W. (2005). Male mating strategies and reproductive constraints in a group of wild tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella nigritus). — Am. J. Primatol. 67: 313-328.
-
Anderson, C.M. (1986). Female age: male preference and reproductive success in primates. — Int. J. Primatol. 7: 305-326.
-
Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. — Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
-
Anzenberger, G. (1993). Social conflict in two monogamous New World primates: pairs and rivals. — In: Primate social conflict (Mason, W.A. & Mendoza, S.P., eds). State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, p. 291-329.
-
Bateman, A.J. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. — Heredity 2: 349-368.
-
Beach, F.A. (1976). Sexual attractivity, proceptivity, and receptivity in female mammals. — Horm. Behav. 7: 105-138.
-
Berger, J. (1989). Female reproductive potential and its apparent evaluation by male mammals. — J. Mammol. 70: 347-358.
-
Berglund, A. (1995). Many mates make male pipefish choosy. — Behaviour 132: 213-218.
-
Bielert, C., Girolami, L. & Anderson, C. (1986). Male chacma baboon (Papio ursinus) sexual arousal: studies with adolescent and adult females as visual stimuli. — Dev. Psychobiol. 19: 369-383.
-
Bonduriansky, R. (2001). The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. — Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 76: 305-339.
-
Bro-Jørgensen, J. (2007). Reversed sexual conflict in a promiscuous antelope. — Curr. Bio. 17: 2157-2161.
-
Bronikowski, A., Cords, M., Alberts, S., Altmann, J., Brockman, D., Fedigan, L., Pusey, A., Stoinski, T., Strier, K.B. & Morris, W. (2016). Female and male life tables for seven wild primate species. — Sci. Data 3: 160006.
-
Cant, M.A. (2000). Social control of reproduction in banded mongooses. — Anim. Behav. 59: 147-158.
-
Carosi, M., Linn, G. & Visalberghi, E. (2005). The sexual behavior and breeding system of tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). — Adv. Stud. Behav. 35: 105-150.
-
Clutton-Brock, T.H. & Vincent, A.C.J. (1991). Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. — Nature 351: 58-60.
-
Cords, M. (2000). The number of males in guenon groups. — In: Primate males (Kappeler, P., ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 84-96.
-
Cords, M. (2002). When are there influxes in blue monkey groups? — In: The guenons: diversity and adaptation in African monkeys (Glenn, M.E. & Cords, M., eds). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY, p. 189-201.
-
Cords, M. (2012). The thirty-year blues: what we know and don’t know about life history, group size and group fission of blue monkeys in the Kakamega Forest, Kenya. — In: Long term studies of primates (Kappeler, P. & Watts, D., eds). Springer, Berlin, p. 289-312.
-
Cords, M. (2018). Towards understanding limited social rank effects on fitness in wild female blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis). Paper presented at the Congress of the International Primatological Society, Nairobi, Kenya (Abstract 14), August 2018.
-
Cords, M. & Chowdhury, S. (2010). Life history of blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis stuhlmanni) in the Kakamega Forest, Kenya. — Int. J. Primatol. 31: 433-455.
-
Cords, M., Mitchell, B.J., Tsingalia, H.M. & Rowell, T.E. (1986). Promiscuous mating among blue monkeys in the Kakamega Forest, Kenya. — Ethology 72: 214-226.
-
Cory, A. & Schneider, J.M. (2016). Old maids have more appeal: effects of age and pheromone source on mate attraction in an orb-web spider. — PeerJ 4: e1877.
-
Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. — Penguin Books, London.
-
Dechaume-Moncharmont, F.X., Brom, T. & Cezilly, F. (2016). Opportunity costs resulting from scramble competition within the choosy sex severely impair mate choosiness. — Anim. Behav. 114: 249-260.
-
Deschner, T., Heistermann, M., Hodges, K. & Boesch, C. (2004). Female sexual swelling size, timing of ovulation, and male behavior in wild West African chimpanzees. — Horm. Behav. 46: 204-215.
-
Dewsbury, D. (1982). Ejaculate cost and male choice. — Am. Nat. 119: 601-610.
-
Dewsbury, D. (2005). The Darwin–Bateman paradigm in historical context. — Integr. Comp. Biol. 45: 831-837.
-
Dixson, A.F. (2012). Primate sexuality. — Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
-
Edward, D.A. & Chapman, T. (2011). The evolution and significance of male mate choice. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 26: 647-654.
-
Ekernas, L.S. & Cords, M. (2007). Social and environmental factors affecting natal dispersal in blue monkeys, Cercopithecus mitis stuhlmanni. — Anim. Behav. 73: 1009-1020.
-
Emery Thompson, M. & Georgiev, A.V. (2014). The high price of success: costs of mating effort in male primates. — Int. J. Primatol. 35: 609-627.
-
Enomoto, T. (1978). On social preference in sexual behavior of Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata). — J. Hum. Evol. 7: 283-293.
-
Fashing, P.J., Nguyen, N., Luteshi, P., Opondo, W., Cash, J.F. & Cords, M. (2012). Evaluating the suitability of planted forests for African forest monkeys: a case study from Kakamega Forest, Kenya. — Am. J. Primatol. 74: 77-90.
-
Ferkin, M.H. & delBarco-Trillo, J. (2014). The behavior of female meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, during postpartum estrus and the responses of males to them. — Mamm. Biol. 79: 81-89.
-
Fitzpatrick, C.L., Altmann, J. & Alberts, S.C. (2015). Exaggerated sexual swellings and male mate choice in primates: testing the reliable indicator hypothesis in the Amboseli baboons. — Anim. Behav. 104: 175-185.
-
Fitzpatrick, C.L. & Servedio, M.R. (2018). The evolution of male mate choice and female ornamentation: a review of mathematical models. — Curr. Zool. 64: 323-333.
-
Girolami, L. & Bielert, C. (1987). Female perineal swelling and its effects on male sexual arousal: an apparent sexual releaser in the chacma baboon (Papio ursinus). — Int. J. Primatol. 8: 651-661.
-
Gowaty, P.A., Steinichen, R. & Anderson, W.W. (2003). Indiscriminate females and choosy males: within- and between-species variation in Drosophila. — Evolution 57: 2037-2045.
-
Gumert, M. (2007). Payment for sex in a macaque mating market. — Anim. Behav. 74: 1655-1667.
-
Hall, K.R. (1962). The sexual, agonistic and derived social behaviour patterns of the wild chacma baboon, Papio ursinus. — Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 139: 283-327.
-
Hammerstein, P. & Noë, R. (2016). Biological trade and markets. — Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci.. 371: 20150101.
-
Hausfater, G. (1975). Dominance and reproduction in baboons (Papio cynocephalus). — Contrib. Primatol. 7: 1-150.
-
Heistermann, M., Brauch, K., Möhle, U., Pfefferle, D., Dittami, J. & Hodges, K. (2008). Female ovarian cycle phase affects the timing of male sexual activity in free-ranging Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus) of Gibraltar. — Am. J. Primatol. 70: 44-53.
-
Herbert, J. (1968). Sexual preference in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) in the laboratory. — Anim. Behav. 16: 120-128.
-
Higham, J.P., Heistermann, M. & Maestripieri, D. (2011). The energetics of male–male endurance rivalry in rhesus macaques. — Anim. Behav. 81: 1001-1007.
-
Higham, J.P., Heistermann, M., Saggau, C., Agil, M., Perwitasari-Farajallah, D. & Engelhardt, A. (2012). Sexual swelling in female crested macaques and the evolution of primate fertility signals. — BMC Evol. Biol. 12: 89.
-
Janicke, T., Haderer, I.K., Lajeunesse, M.J. & Anthes, N. (2016). Darwinian sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom. — Sci. Adv. 2: e1500983.
-
Jones, C.B. (1985). Reproductive patterns in mantled howler monkeys: estrus, mate choice, and copulation. — Primates 26: 130-142.
-
Jones, K.M., Monaghan, P. & Nager, R.G. (2001). Male mate choice and female fecundity in zebra finches. — Anim. Behav. 62: 1021-1026.
-
Kappeler, P.M. (2012). Mate choice. — In: The evolution of primate societies (Mitani, J.C., Call, J., Kappeler, P.M., Palombit, R.A. & Silk, J.B., eds). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, p. 367-386.
-
Kappeler, P.M. & van Schaik, C.P. (2004). Sexual selection in primates: review and selective preview. — In: Sexual selection in primates: new and comparative perspectives (Kappeler, P.M. & van Schaik, C.P., eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 3-23.
-
Keddy, A.C. (1986). Female mate choice in vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus). — Am. J. Primatol. 10: 125-234.
-
Klass, K. & Cords, M. (2015). Agonism and dominance in female blue monkeys. — Am. J. Primatol. 77: 1299-1315.
-
Kuester, J. & Paul, A. (1996). Female–female competition and male mate choice in Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus). — Behaviour 133: 763-790.
-
Kummer, H., Götz, W. & Angst, W. (1974). Triadic differentiation: an inhibitory process protecting pair bonds in baboons. — Behaviour 49: 62-87.
-
Kvarnemo, C. & Simmons, L. (1999). Variance in female quality, operational sex ratio, and male mate choice in a bushcricket. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 45: 245-252.
-
Lawes, M.J., Cords, M. & Lehn, C. (2013). Cercopithecus mitis species profile. — In: Mammals of Africa, volume 2: primates (Butynski, T.M., Kingdon, J. & Kalina, J., eds). Bloomsbury Publishing, London, p. 354-362.
-
Mainguy, J., Côté, S., Cardinal, E. & Houle, M. (2008). Mating tactics and mate choice in relation to age and social rank in male mountain goats. — J. Mammal. 89: 626-635.
-
Majolo, B., Lehmann, J., de Bortoli Vizioli, A. & Schino, G. (2012). Fitness-related benefits of dominance in primates. — Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 147: 652-660.
-
Mitchell, N., Schaab, G. & Wägele, J.W. (2009). Kakamega Forest ecosystem: an introduction to the natural history and the human context. BIOTA East Africa Report No. 5. — Karslruher Geowissenschaftlicher Schriften A 17: 1-58.
-
Muller, M.N., Emery-Thompson, M. & Wrangham, R.W. (2006). Male chimpanzees prefer mating with old females. — Curr. Biol. 16: 2234-2238.
-
Nakagawa, S. & Cuthill, I.C. (2007). Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. — Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 82: 591-605.
-
Nichols, H.J., Amos, W., Cant, M.A., Bell, M.B.V. & Hodge, S.J. (2010). Top males gain high reproductive success by guarding more successful females in a cooperatively breeding mongoose. — Anim. Behav. 80: 649-657.
-
Noë, R. (2017). Local mating markets in humans and non-human animals. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 71: 148.
-
Norscia, I., Antonacci, D. & Palagi, E. (2009). Mating first, mating more: biological market fluctuation in a wild prosimian. — PLoS ONE 4: e4679.
-
Overduin-de Vries, A.M., Massen, J.J., Spruijt, B.M. & Sterck, E.H. (2012). Sneaky monkeys: an audience effect of male rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) on sexual behavior. — Am. J. Primatol. 74: 217-228.
-
Parga, J.A. (2006). Male mate choice in Lemur catta. — Int. J. Primatol. 27: 107-131.
-
Pazol, K., Carlson, A.A. & Ziegler, T.E. (2002). Female reproductive endocrinology in wild blue monkeys: a preliminary assessment and discussion of potential adaptive functions. — In: The guenons: diversity and adaptation in African monkeys (Glenn, M.E. & Cords, M., eds). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY, p. 217-232.
-
Pazol, K. (2003). Mating in the Kakamega Forest blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis): does female sexual behavior function to manipulate paternity assessment? — Behaviour 140: 473-499.
-
Pinxten, R. & Eens, M. (1997). Copulations and mate guarding patterns in polygynous male starlings. — Anim. Behav. 54: 45-58.
-
Preston, B., Stevenson, I., Pemberton, J., Coltman, D. & Wilson, K. (2005). Male mate choice influences female promiscuity in Soay sheep. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 272: 365-373.
-
Pusey, A.E. (2012). Magnitude and sources of variation in female reproductive performance. — In: The evolution of primate societies (Mitani, J.C., Call, J., Kappeler, P.M., Palombit, R.A. & Silk, J.B., eds). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, p. 343-366.
-
Roberts, S. & Cords, M. (2013). Group size but not dominance rank predicts the probability of conception in a frugivorous primate. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 67: 1995-2009.
-
Saayman, G.S. (1970). The menstrual cycle and sexual behavior in a troop of free ranging chacma baboons (Papio ursinus). — Folia Primatol. 12: 81-110.
-
Saether, S.A., Fiske, P. & Kålås, J.A. (2001). Male mate choice, sexual conflict and strategic allocation of copulations in a lekking bird. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 268: 2097-2102.
-
Samuels, A., Silk, J.B. & Rodman, P.S. (1984). Changes in the dominance rank and reproductive behavior of male Bonnet macaques (Macaca radiata). — Anim. Behav. 32: 994-1003.
-
Schmid, V.S. & de Vries, H. (2013). Finding a dominance order most consistent with a linear hierarchy: an improved algorithm for the I&SI method. — Anim. Behav. 86: 1097-1105.
-
Setchell, J.M. (2016). Sexual selection and the differences between the sexes in mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx). — Yearb. Phys. Anthropol. 159(Suppl. 61): S105-S129.
-
Setchell, J.M. & Kappeler, P.M. (2003). Selection in relation to sex in primates. — Adv. Stud. Behav. 33: 87-173.
-
Seyfarth, R. (1978). Social relationships among adult male and female baboons. I. Behaviour during sexual consortship. — Behaviour 64: 204-226.
-
Shelley, T.E. & Bailey, W.J. (1991). Experimental manipulation of mate choice by male katydids: the effect of female encounter rate. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 30: 277-282.
-
Small, M. (1988). Female primate sexual behavior and conception: are there really sperm to spare? — Curr. Anthropol. 29: 81-100.
-
Sommer, V., Srivastava, A. & Borries, C. (1992). Cycles, sexuality, and conception in free-ranging langurs (Presbytis entellus). — Am. J. Primatol. 28: 1-27.
-
Street, S.E., Cross, C.P. & Brown, G.R. (2016). Exaggerated sexual swellings in female nonhuman priamtes are reliable signals of female fertility and body condition. — Anim. Behav. 112: 203-212.
-
Stumpf, R. & Boesch, C. (2006). The efficacy of female choice in chimpanzees of the Taï Forest, Côte d’Ivoire. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 60: 749-765.
-
Syzkman, M., Engh, A.L., Van Horn, R.C., Funk, S.M., Scribner, K.T. & Holekamp, K.E. (2001). Association patterns among male and female spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) reflect male mate choice. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50: 231-238.
-
Tang-Martínez, Z. (2016). Rethinking Bateman’s principles: challenging persistent myths of sexually reluctant females and promiscuous males. — J. Sex Res. 53: 532-559.
-
Tang-Martinez, Z. & Ryder, R.B. (2005). The problem with paradigms: Bateman’s worldview as a case study. — Integr. Comp. Biol. 45: 821-830.
-
Trivers, R.L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. — In: Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (Campbell, B., ed.). Aldine, Chicago, IL, p. 136-179.
-
van Hooff, J.A.R.A.M. (2000). Relationships among non-human primate males: a deductive framework. — In: Primate males (Kappeler, P., ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 183-191.
-
Wallen, K. (2001). Sex and contest: hormones and primate sexual motivation. — Horm. Behav. 40: 339-357.
-
Wang, D., Wang, C., Singh, N., Cooper, R., Zha, C. & Eiden, E.L. (2016). Effect of mating status and age on male mate choice and mating competency in the common bedbug, Cimex lectularius (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). — J. Econ. Entomol. 109: 1333-1340.
-
Watts, D.P. (1991). Mountain gorilla reproduction and sexual behavior. — Am. J. Primatol. 24: 211-225.
-
Wedell, N., Gage, M.J.G. & Parker, G.A. (2002). Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 313-320.
-
Wronski, T., Bierbach, D., Czupalla, L., Lerp, H., Ziege, M., Cunningham, P.L. & Plath, M. (2012). Rival presence leads to reversible changes in male mate choice of a desert dwelling ungulate. — Behav. Ecol. 23: 551-558.
-
Zhang, M., Li, J., Zhu, Y., Wang, X. & Wang, S. (2010). Male mate choice in Tibetan macaques Macaca thibetana at Mt. Huangshan, China. — Curr. Zool. 56: 213-221.
-
Ziege, M., Hennige-Schulz, C., Mücksch, F., Bierbach, D., Tiedemann, R., Streit, B. & Plath, M. (2012). A comparison of two methods to assess audience-induced changes in male mate choice. — Curr. Zool. 58: 84-94.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1204 | 169 | 9 |
| Full Text Views | 160 | 1 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 175 | 3 | 0 |
Reluctant males: why blue monkey males reject female sexual advances
In: BehaviourSearch for other papers by Sofia Schembari in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marina Cords in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Classical sexual selection theory predicts that males should mate eagerly, yet blue monkey males often reject females’ sexual invitations. We evaluated how males’ responses to female solicitations related to female characteristics, number of males and conceptive females present, and the male’s recent copulations. Using 12 years of data from a wild population, we found that males accepted only 20% of female solicitations. Odds of acceptance (copulation) increased for conceptive females, for females with whom the male copulated recently, and when fewer males were present. Odds of accepting nulliparous females decreased when more conceptive females were available, consistent with market models. Male responses did not relate to female rank or matings with other females the same day. When males responded negatively, nulliparous females were especially likely to receive aggression vs. mere refusal. Overall, males’ decisions to mate with willing females depended both on female characteristics, especially fertility, and on social context.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1204 | 169 | 9 |
| Full Text Views | 160 | 1 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 175 | 3 | 0 |
