Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Olfactory recognition of snake cues by fawn-footed mosaic-tailed rats Melomys cervinipes
in BehaviourCentre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Sciences, James Cook University, P.O. Box 6811, Cairns, QLD 4870, Australia
Search for other papers by Kelsey Paulling in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by David Wilson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Sciences, James Cook University, P.O. Box 6811, Cairns, QLD 4870, Australia
Search for other papers by Tasmin L. Rymer in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Rodents rely on their sensitive olfactory systems to detect and respond to predators. We investigated the ability of a native Australian rodent, the fawn-footed mosaic-tailed rat Melomys cervinipes, to detect, recognise, and discriminate between two species of native snakes. We used snake sheds from a sympatric venomous red-bellied black snake Pseudechis porphyriacus and a non-sympatric non-venomous Stimson’s python Antaresia stimsoni. 20 mosaic-tailed rats each experienced three olfactory tests using a Y-maze. Rats were first exposed to one snake shed against a paper control, and then exposed to the other snake shed against a paper control. Which rat experienced which shed first was allocated randomly. Mosaic-tailed rats were then exposed to both sheds simultaneously. Rats could detect the snake sheds, spending longer investigating, and making more visits to, the sheds than the paper control. They also recognised the sheds as potentially dangerous, reducing their total investigation over time, but increasing their frequency of visits. However, rats did not discriminate between sheds, suggesting a general strategy for assessing the identity of reptilian predators.
Kauf
Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):
Institutszugang
Melden Sie sich mit Open Athens, Shibboleth oder Ihren institutionellen Anmeldedaten an.
Persönliche Anmeldung
Melden Sie sich mit Ihrem brill.com-Konto an
-
Ache, B.W. & Young, J.M. (2005). Olfaction: diverse species, conserved principles. — Neuron 48: 417-430.
-
Akkerman, S., Blokland, A., Reneerkens, O., van Goethem, N.P., Bollen, E., Gijselaers, H.J.M., Lieben, C.K.J., Steinbusch, H.W.M. & Prickaerts, J. (2012). Object recognition testing: methodological considerations on exploration and discrimination measures. — Behav. Brain Res. 232: 335-347.
-
Apfelbach, R., Blanchard, C.D., Blanchard, R.J., Hayes, R.A. & McGregor, I.S. (2005). Effects of predator odours in mammalian prey species: a review of field and laboratory studies. — Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 29: 1123-1144.
-
Beatty, W.W. (1979). Gonadal hormones and sex differences in nonreproductive behaviours in rodents: organizational and activational influences. — Horm. Behav. 12: 112-163.
-
Bevins, R.A. & Besheer, J. (2006). Object recognition in rats and mice: a one-trial non-matching-to-sample learning task to study ‘recognition memory’. — Nature Prot. 3: 1306-1311.
-
Bind, R.H., Minney, S.M., Rosenfeld, S. & Hallock, R.M. (2013). The role of pheromonal responses in rodent behaviour: future directions for the development of laboratory protocols. — J. Am. Ass. Lab. Anim. Sci. 52: 124-129.
-
Bull, C.M., Griffin, C.L. & Johnston, G.R. (1999). Olfactory discrimination in scat-piling lizards. — Behav. Ecol. 10: 136-140.
-
Callaway, W.A., Turner, A.A., Croshaw, O.B., Ferguson, J.A., Julson, Z.J.N., Volp, T.M., Kerr, S.E. & Rymer, T.L. (2018). Melomys cervinipes (Rodentia: Muridae). — Mammal. Spec. 50: 134-147.
-
Castelhano-Carlos, M.J. & Baumans, V. (2009). The impact of light, noise, cage cleaning and in-house transport on welfare and stress of laboratory rats. — Lab. Anim. 43: 311-327.
-
Chiszar, D., Carter, T., Knight, L., Simonsen, L. & Taylor, S. (1976). Investigatory behaviour in the plains garter snake (Thamnophis radix) and several additional species. — Anim. Learn. Behav. 3: 273-278.
-
Choi, J.S. & Kim, J.J. (2010). Amygdala regulates risk of predation in rats foraging in a dynamic fear environment. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 21773-21777.
-
Cramer, M.J. & Willig, M.R. (2002). Habitat heterogeneity, habitat associations, and rodent species diversity in a sand: shinnery-oak landscape. — J. Mammal. 83: 743-753.
-
Dawkins, R. & Krebs, J.R. (1979). Arms races between and within species. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 205: 489-511.
-
Feltmate, B.W. & Williams, D.D. (1989). A test of crypsis and predator avoidance in the stonefly Paragnetina media (Plecoptera: Perlidae). — Anim. Behav. 37: 992-999.
-
Ferrari, M.C.O., Messier, F. & Chivers, D.P. (2008). Can prey exhibit threat-sensitive generalization of predator recognition? Extending the predator recognition continuum hypothesis. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 275: 1811-1816.
-
Graham, D. (1972). A behavioural analysis of the temporal organisation of walking movements in the 1st instar and adult stick insect (Carausius morosus). — J. Comp. Physiol. 81: 23-52.
-
Hayes, R.A., Nahrung, H.F. & Wilson, J.C. (2006). The response of native Australian rodents to predator odours varies seasonally: a by-product of life history variation? — Anim. Behav. 71: 1307-1314.
-
Hodges, K.E., Cunningham, J.A.F. & Mills, L.S. (2014). Avoiding and escaping predators: movement tortuosity of snowshoe hares in risky habitats. — Ecoscience 21: 97-103.
-
Hogstad, O. (2017). Predator discrimination and anti-predator behaviour in wintering parids: an experimental study. — Ornis Nor. 40: 39-44.
-
Hurst, J.L., Gray, S.J., Davey, P., Young, D., Corbishley, J. & Dawson, C. (1997). Social interaction alters attraction to competitor’s odour in the mouse Mus spretus Lataste. — Anim. Behav. 54: 941-953.
-
Kindermann, T., Siemers, B.M. & Fendt, M. (2009). Innate or learned acoustic recognition of avian predators in rodents? — J. Exp. Biol. 212: 506-513.
-
King, A.J., Fürtbauer, I., Mamuneas, D., James, C. & Manica, A. (2013). Sex-differences and temporal consistency in stickleback fish boldness. — PLoS ONE 8: e81116.
-
Langellotto, G.A. & Denno, R.F. (2004). Responses of invertebrate natural enemies to complex-structured habitats: a meta-analytical synthesis. — Oecologia 139: 1-10.
-
Lenchova, P., Roberts, S.C. & Havlicek, J. (2008). Methods of human body odour sampling: the effect of freezing. — Chem. Senses 34: 127-138.
-
Lillywhite, H.B., de Delva, P. & Noonan, B.P. (2002). Patterns of gut passage time and the chronic retention of fecal mass in viperid snakes. — In: Biology of the vipers (Schuett, G.W., Höggren, M. & Greene, H.W., eds). Biological Sciences Press, Michigan, p. 497-506.
-
Magurran, A.E. (1986). Predator inspection behaviour in minnow shoals: differences between populations and individuals. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19: 267-273.
-
Mason, R.T. & Parker, M.R. (2010). Social behaviour and pheromonal communication in reptiles. — J. Comp. Physiol. A. 196: 729-749.
-
Mbata, K.J. (1985). The anatomy of the armoured ground cricket, Acanthoplus speiseri Brancsik 1895 (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae, Hetrodinae). — PhD thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
-
McDonald, K., Burnett, S. & Robinson, W. (2013). Utility of owl pellets for monitoring threatened mammal communities: an Australian case study. — Wildlife Res. 40: 685-697.
-
Mendelson, T.C. (2015). Distinguishing perceptual and conceptual levels of recognition at group boundaries. — Evol. Ecol. 29: 205-215.
-
Misslin, R. & Ropartz, P. (1981). Responses in rats to a novel object. — Behaviour 78: 169-177.
-
Mitchell, M.D., Chivers, D.P., McCormick, M.I. & Ferrari, M.C.O. (2015). Learning to distinguish between predators and non-predators: understanding the critical role of diet cues and predator odours in generalisation. — Sci. Rep. UK 5: 13918.
-
Moore, L.A. & Burnett, S. (2008). Fawn-footed Melomys. — In: The mammals of Australia, 3rd edn. (van Dyck, S. & Strahan, R., eds). Reed New Holland, Sydney, NSW, p. 671-672.
-
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) (2013). Australian code for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes, 8th edn. — National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra, ACT.
-
Overman, W., Bachevalier, J., Turner, M. & Peuster, A. (1992). Object recognition versus object discrimination: comparison between human infants and infant monkeys. — Behav. Neurosci. 106: 15-29.
-
Papes, F., Logan, D.W. & Stowers, L. (2010). The vomeronasal organ mediates interspecies defensive behaviours through detection of protein pheromone homologs. — Cell 141: 692-703.
-
Pasteels, J.M., Gregoire, J.C. & Rowell-Rahier, M. (1983). The chemical ecology of defense in arthropods. — Annu. Rev. Entomol. 28: 263-289.
-
Pavlicev, M., Cheverud, J.M. & Wagner, G.P. (2010). Evolution of adaptive phenotypic variation patterns by direct selection for evolvability. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 278: 1903-1912.
-
Pillay, N., Eborall, J. & Ganem, G. (2006). Divergence of mate recognition in the African striped mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio). — Behav. Ecol. 17: 757-764.
-
Polis, G.A. & Strong, D.R. (1996). Food web complexity and community dynamics. — Am. Nat. 147: 813-846.
-
Rymer, T. & Pillay, N. (2010). Female mate choice for paternal care behaviour in African striped mice Rhabdomys pumilio: the role of experience. — Behaviour 147: 1101-1119.
-
Seyfarth, R.M., Cheney, D.L. & Marler, P. (1980). Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. — Science 210: 801-803.
-
Shapira, I., Walker, E., Brunton, D. & Raubenheimer, D. (2013). Responses to direct versus indirect cues of predation and competition in naïve invasive mice: implications for management. — New Zeal. J. Ecol. 37: 33-40.
-
Sordahl, T. (2004). Field evidence of predator discrimination abilities in American avocets and black-necked stilts. — J. Field Ornithol. 75: 376-385.
-
Stabler, R.M. (1939). Frequency of skin shedding in snakes. — Copeia 4: 227-229.
-
Steen, J.B., Erikstad, K.E. & Høidal, K. (1992). Cryptic behaviour in moulting hen Willow Ptarmigan Lagopus l. lagopus during snow melt. — Ornis Scand. 23: 101-104.
-
Stuart-Fox, D., Moussalli, A. & Whiting, M.J. (2008). Predator-specific camouflage in chameleons. — Biol. Lett. 4: 326-329.
-
Vilhunen, S. & Hirvonen, H. (2003). Innate antipredator responses of Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) depend on predator species and their diet. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 55: 1-10.
-
Vitale, A., Calisi, R., Carere, C., Carter, T., Ha, J.C., Hubrecht, R., Jennings, D., Metcalfe, N., Ophir, A.G., Ratcliffe, J.M., Roth, T.C., Smith, A. & Sneddon, L. (2018). Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching. — Anim. Behav. 135: I-X.
-
Weldon, P.J. & Schell, F.M. (1984). Responses by king snakes (Lampropeltis getulus) to chemicals from colubrid and crotaline snakes. — J. Chem. Ecol. 10: 1509-1520.
-
Wood, D.H. (1971). The ecology of Rattus fuscipes and Melomys cervinipes (Rodentia: Muridae) in a south-east Queensland rain forest. — Aust. J. Zool. 19: 371-392.
-
Wywialowski, A.P. (1987). Habitat structure and predators: choices and consequences for rodent habitat specialists and generalists. — Oecologia 72: 39-45.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 1558 | 248 | 24 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 134 | 7 | 0 |
| PDF-Downloads | 112 | 15 | 0 |
Olfactory recognition of snake cues by fawn-footed mosaic-tailed rats Melomys cervinipes
in BehaviourCentre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Sciences, James Cook University, P.O. Box 6811, Cairns, QLD 4870, Australia
Search for other papers by Kelsey Paulling in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David Wilson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Sciences, James Cook University, P.O. Box 6811, Cairns, QLD 4870, Australia
Search for other papers by Tasmin L. Rymer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Rodents rely on their sensitive olfactory systems to detect and respond to predators. We investigated the ability of a native Australian rodent, the fawn-footed mosaic-tailed rat Melomys cervinipes, to detect, recognise, and discriminate between two species of native snakes. We used snake sheds from a sympatric venomous red-bellied black snake Pseudechis porphyriacus and a non-sympatric non-venomous Stimson’s python Antaresia stimsoni. 20 mosaic-tailed rats each experienced three olfactory tests using a Y-maze. Rats were first exposed to one snake shed against a paper control, and then exposed to the other snake shed against a paper control. Which rat experienced which shed first was allocated randomly. Mosaic-tailed rats were then exposed to both sheds simultaneously. Rats could detect the snake sheds, spending longer investigating, and making more visits to, the sheds than the paper control. They also recognised the sheds as potentially dangerous, reducing their total investigation over time, but increasing their frequency of visits. However, rats did not discriminate between sheds, suggesting a general strategy for assessing the identity of reptilian predators.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 1558 | 248 | 24 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 134 | 7 | 0 |
| PDF-Downloads | 112 | 15 | 0 |
