Underwater click train production by the hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius) suggests an echo-ranging function
In: BehaviourBiopsychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, The Graduate Center, CUNY, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
Search for other papers by Maria Maust-Mohl in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Joseph Soltis in
Current site
Google Scholar
Department of Psychology, Hunter College, CUNY, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
Search for other papers by Diana Reiss in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Common hippos (Hippopotamus amphibius) live in murky waters and produce a variety of acoustic signals including underwater click trains considered to be social in function. We tested the hypothesis that click trains may function for underwater detection. We used observational and experimental methods involving 16 captive hippos to document the occurrence of click trains in different contexts and describe the acoustic parameters of the clicks. Male and female hippos produced click trains correlated with searching underwater for food items placed in their pools. Males produced click trains when alone supporting the hypothesis that these signals function for detection and are not only social in function. The frequency bandwidth of individual clicks varied and most were below 10 000 Hz. Click train production by hippos during underwater searches suggests a rudimentary form of echo-ranging that may function when other sensory systems are limited in their aquatic environment.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Au, W.W.L. (1993). The sonar of dolphins. — Springer, New York, NY.
-
Au, W.W.L. & Hastings, M.C. (2008). Principles of marine bioacoustics. — Springer, New York, NY.
-
Barklow, W.E. (1997). Some underwater sounds of the hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius). — Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 29: 237-249.
-
Barklow, W.E. (2004). Amphibious communication with sounds in hippos, Hippopotamus amphibius. — Anim. Behav. 68: 1125-1132.
-
Brinklov, S., Fenton, M.B. & Ratcliffe, J.M. (2013). Echolocation in oilbirds and swiftlets. — Front. Physiol. 4: 1-12.
-
Brown, P.E. & Grinnell, A.D. (1980). Echolocation ontogeny in bats. — In: Animal sonar systems (Busnel, R.G. & Fish, J.F., eds). Plenum Press, New York, NY, p. 355-377.
-
Churchill, M., Martinez-Caceres, M., de Muizon, C., Mnieckowski, J. & Geisler, J.H. (2016). The origin of high-frequency hearing in whales. — Curr. Biol. 26: 2144-2149.
-
Dawson, S.M. (1991). Clicks and communication: the behavioral and social contexts of Hector’s dolphin vocalizations. — Ethology 88: 265-276.
-
Dudley, J.P. (1998). Reports of carnivory by the common hippo Hippopotamus amphibius. — S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 28: 58-59.
-
Edds-Walton, P.L. (1997). Acoustic communication signals of mysticete whales. — Bioacoustics 8: 47-60.
-
Eltringham, S.K. (1999). The hippos. — Academic Press, London.
-
Karstad, E.L. & Hudson, R.J. (1986). Social organization and communication of riverine hippopotami in southwestern Kenya. — Mammalia 50: 153-164.
-
Klingel, H. (1991). The social organization and behaviour of Hippopotamus amphibius. — In: African wildlife: research and management (Kayanja, I.B. & Edroma, E.L., eds). International Council of Scientific Unions, Paris, p. 73-75.
-
Krueger, S.K. (2000). Investigating echolocation in the Hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius). — M.S. Thesis, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH.
-
Longhurst, W. (1966). Observations on apparent echo-ranging by Hippopotamus in Uganda. — In: Proceedings of the third annual conference on biological sonar and diving mammals. Stanford Research Institute, Fremont, CA, p. 210-214.
-
Luck, C.P. (1965). The comparative morphology of the eyes of certain African suiformes. — Vis. Res. 5: 283-297.
-
Maust-Mohl, M., Soltis, J. & Reiss, D. (2015). Acoustic and behavioral repertoires of the hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius). — Acoustic Soc. Am. 138: 545-554.
-
Mourlam, M.J. & Orliac, M.J. (2017). Infrasonic and ultrasonic hearing evolved after the emergence of modern whales. — Curr. Biol. 27: 1776-1781.
-
Mugangu, T.E. & Hunter, M.L. (1992). Aquatic foraging by hippopotamus in Zaire — response to a food shortage. — Mammalia 56: 345-349.
-
Poulter, T.C. (1963). Sonar signals of the sea lion. — Science 139: 753-755.
-
Poulter, T.C. (1966). The use of active sonar by the California sea lion. — J. Audit. Res. 6: 165-173.
-
Reiss, D. (1988). Observations on the development of echolocation in young bottlenose dolphins. — In: Animal sonar (Nachtigall, P.E. & Moore, P.W.B., eds). Plenum Press, New York, NY, p. 121-127.
-
Schusterman, R.J., Kastak, D., Levenson, D.H., Reichmuth, C.J. & Southall, B.L. (2000). Why pinnipeds don’t echolocate. — J. Acoustic Soc. Am. 107: 2256-2264.
-
Shenkman, B.N. & Nilsson, M.E. (2010). Human echolocation: blind and sighted persons’ ability to detect sounds recorded in the presence of a reflecting object. — Perception 29: 483-501.
-
Siemers, B.M., Schauermann, G., Turni, H. & von Merten, S. (2009). Why do shrews Twitter? Communication or simple echo-based orientation. — Biol. Lett. 5: 593-596.
-
Stimpert, A.K., Wiley, D.N., Au, W.W.L., Johnson, M.P. & Arsenault, R. (2007). ‘Megapclicks’: acoustic click trains and buzzes produced during night-time foraging of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). — Biol. Lett. 3: 467-470.
-
Thomas, J.A., Fischer, S.R., Evans, W.E. & Awbrey, F.T. (1983). Ultrasonic vocalizations of leopard seals Hydrurga leptonyx. — Antarct. J. 17: 186.
-
Thomas, J.A., Moss, C.F. & Vater, M. (2003). Echolocation in bats and dolphins. — The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
-
Thomas, J.A. & Jalili, M.S. (2004). Echolocation in insectivores and rodents. — In: Echolocation in bats and dolphins (Thomas, J.A., Moss, C.F. & Vater, M., eds). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, p. 547-564.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 2936 | 348 | 17 |
| Full Text Views | 360 | 7 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 199 | 15 | 0 |
Underwater click train production by the hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius) suggests an echo-ranging function
In: BehaviourBiopsychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, The Graduate Center, CUNY, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
Search for other papers by Maria Maust-Mohl in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joseph Soltis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Psychology, Hunter College, CUNY, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
Search for other papers by Diana Reiss in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Common hippos (Hippopotamus amphibius) live in murky waters and produce a variety of acoustic signals including underwater click trains considered to be social in function. We tested the hypothesis that click trains may function for underwater detection. We used observational and experimental methods involving 16 captive hippos to document the occurrence of click trains in different contexts and describe the acoustic parameters of the clicks. Male and female hippos produced click trains correlated with searching underwater for food items placed in their pools. Males produced click trains when alone supporting the hypothesis that these signals function for detection and are not only social in function. The frequency bandwidth of individual clicks varied and most were below 10 000 Hz. Click train production by hippos during underwater searches suggests a rudimentary form of echo-ranging that may function when other sensory systems are limited in their aquatic environment.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 2936 | 348 | 17 |
| Full Text Views | 360 | 7 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 199 | 15 | 0 |
