Insights to the mating strategies of Habronattus americanus jumping spiders from natural behaviour and staged interactions in the wild
äºBehaviourSearch for other papers by Gwylim S. Blackburn in
Current site
Google Scholar
bDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, 3529-6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4
Search for other papers by Wayne P. Maddison in
Current site
Google Scholar
We documented natural behaviour and staged intersexual interactions of Habronattus americanus jumping spiders in the wild in order to clarify three aspects of their mating strategies: (1)Â Do males invest more than females in locomotory mate search? (2)Â Do females exert strong mate choice? (3)Â Do direct contests occur among males? Males apparently invested heavily in mate search, travelling more than females yet eating nothing. Conversely, females frequently hunted and spent 10% of their time feeding. Females encountered one male per hour, likely affording them a high degree of choice among prospective mates. Accordingly, they promoted the termination of each interaction and ultimately rejected nearly all courting males. Maleâmale interactions were brief and did not feature direct antagonism. Our findings suggest that mate competition in H. americanus is characterized by male scramble competition for dispersed females, and that female mate choice may exert strong selection on male sexual display traits.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Agresti A., Coull B.A. (1998). Approximate is better than âexactâ for interval estimation of binomial proportions. â Am. Stat. 52: 119-126.
-
Albon S.D., Clutton-Brock T.H. (1979). The roaring of red deer and the evolution of honest advertisement. â Behaviour 69: 145-170.
-
Andersson M. (1994). Sexual selection. â Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
-
Bateman A.J. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster. â Heredity 2: 349-368.
-
Beebe W. (1944). The function of secondary sexual characters in two species of Dynastinae (Coleoptera). â Zoologica 29: 53-58.
-
Berglund A., Bizazza A., Pilastro A. (1996). Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. â Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 58: 385-399.
-
Blackburn G.S., Maddison W.P. (2014). Stark sexual display divergence among jumping spider populations in the face of gene flow. â Mol. Ecol. 23: 5208-5223.
-
Chan J.P.Y., Lau P.R., Tham A.J., Li D. (2008). The effects of maleâmale contests and female eavesdropping on female mate choice and male mating success in the jumping spider, Thiania bhamoensis (Araneae: Salticidae). â Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62: 639-646.
-
Clark D.L., Biesiadecki B. (2002). Mating success and alternative reproductive strategies of the dimorphic jumping spider, Maevia inclemens (Araneae, Salticidae). â J. Arachnol. 30: 511-518.
-
Elias D.O., Mason A.C., Maddison W.P., Hoy R.R. (2003). Seismic signals in a courting male jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae). â J. Exp. Biol. 206: 4029-4039.
-
Elias D.O., Hebets E.A., Hoy R.R., Mason A. (2005). Seismic signals are crucial for male mating success in a visual specialist jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae). â Anim. Behav. 69: 931-938.
-
Elias D.O., Hebets E.A., Hoy R.R., Maddison W.P., Mason A.C. (2006a). Regional seismic song differences in sky island populations of the jumping spider Habronattus pugillis Griswold (Araneae, Salticidae). â J. Arachnol. 34: 545-556.
-
Elias D.O., Hebets E.A., Hoy R.R. (2006b). Female preference for complex/novel signals in a spider. â Behav. Ecol. 17: 765-771.
-
Elias D.O., Maddison W.P., Peckmezian C., Girard M.B., Mason A.C. (2012). Orchestrating the score: complex multimodal courtship in the Habronattus coecatus group of Habronattus jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). â Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 105: 522-547.
-
Emlen S.T., Oring L.W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and evolution of mating systems. â Science 197: 215-223.
-
Fisher R.A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. â Clarendon Press, Oxford.
-
Griswold C.E. (1987). AÂ revision of the jumping spider genus Habronattus F.O.P. Cambridge (Araneae, Salticidae), with phenetic and cladistic analyses. â University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
-
Hammerstein P., Parker G.A. (1987). Sexual selection: games between the sexes. â In: Sexual selection: testing the alternatives ( Bradbury J.W., Heisler L., Andersson M.B., eds). Wiley, Berlin, p. 119-142.
-
Hebets E.A., Maddison W.P. (2005). Xenophilic mating preferences among populations of the jumping spider Habronattus pugillis Griswold. â Behav. Ecol. 16: 981-988.
-
Hill G.E. (1991). Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. â Nature 350: 337-339.
-
Jackson R.R. (1977). Courtship versatility in the jumping spider, Phidippus johnsoni (Araneae: Salticidae). â Anim. Behav. 25: 953-957.
-
Jackson R. (1978). The mating strategy of Phidippus johnsoni (Araneae, Salticidae). â Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 6: 1-29.
-
Jennions M.D., Petrie M. (1997). Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. â Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 72: 283-327.
-
Jones A.G., Rosenqvist G., Berglund A., Arnold S.J., Avise J.C. (2000). The Bateman gradient and the cause of sexual selection in a sex-role-reversed pipefish. â Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 267: 677-680.
-
Kasumovic M.M., Bruce M.J., Herberstein M.E., Andrade M.C.B. (2006). Risky mate search and mate preference in the golden orb-web spider (Nephila plumipes). â Behav. Ecol. 18: 189-195.
-
Kokko H., Wong B.B.M. (2007). What determines sex roles in mate searching? â Evolution 61: 1162-1175.
-
Lane J.E., Boutin S., Gunn M.R., Coltman D.W. (2009). Sexually selected behaviour: red squirrel males search for reproductive success. â J. Anim. Ecol. 78: 296-304.
-
Lim M.L.M., Li D. (2007). Effects of age and feeding history on structure-based UV ornaments of a jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae). â Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 274: 569-575.
-
Lim M.L.M., Land M.F., Li D.Q. (2007). Sex-specific UV and fluorescence signals in jumping spiders. â Science 315: 481.
-
Maddison W.P. (1995). Habronattus americanus group version 01. â Available online at http://tolweb.org/Habronattus_americanus/3934.
-
Maddison W.P., McMahon M. (2000). Divergence and reticulation among montane populations of a jumping spider (Habronattus pugillis Griswold). â Syst. Biol. 49: 400-421.
-
Maddison W.P., Stratton G.E. (1988). Sound production and associated morphology in male jumping spiders of the Habronattus agilis species group (Araneae, Salticidae). â J. Arachnol. 16: 199-211.
-
Masta S.E., Maddison W.P. (2002). Sexual selection driving diversification in jumping spiders. â Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 4442-4447.
-
Peckham G.W., Peckham E.G. (1889). Observations on sexual selection in spiders of the family Attidae. â Occas. Pap. Nat. Hist. Soc. Wisconsin 1: 1-60.
-
Peckham G.W., Peckham E.G. (1890). Additional observations on sexual selection in spiders of the family Attidae, with some remarks on Mr. Wallaceâs theory of sexual ornamentation. â Occas. Pap. Nat. Hist. Soc. Wisconsin 1: 117-151.
-
Proctor H.C. (1992). Sensory exploitation and the evolution of male mating behaviour: a cladistic test using water mites (Acari: Parasitengona). â Anim. Behav. 44: 745-752.
-
Richman D. (1982). Epigamic display in jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae) and its use in systematics. â J. Arachnol. 10: 47-67.
-
Scherer R. (2013). PropCIs: various confidence interval methods for proportions. â Available online at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PropCIs.
-
Schwagmeyer P.L., Woontner S.J. (1986). Scramble competition polygyny in thirteen-lined ground squirrels: the relative contributions of overt conflict and competitive mate searching. â Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19: 359-364.
-
Searcy W.A., Nowicki S. (2000). Maleâmale competition and female choice in the evolution of vocal signaling. â In: Animal signals ( Espmark Y., Amundsen T., Rosenqvist T., eds). Tapir Academic, Trondheim, p. 301-315.
-
Shuster S.M., Wade M.J. (2003). Mating systems and strategies. â Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
-
Taylor L.A., McGraw K.J. (2013). Male ornamental coloration improves courtship success in a jumping spider, but only in the sun. â Behav. Ecol. 24: 955-967.
-
Taylor L.A., Clark D.L., McGraw K.J. (2011). Condition dependence of male display coloration in a jumping spider (Habronattus pyrrithrix). â Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65: 1133-1146.
-
Taylor L.A., Clark D.L., McGraw K.J. (2014). Natural variation in condition-dependent display colour does not predict male courtship success in a jumping spider. â Anim. Behav. 93: 267-278.
-
Thornhill R., Alcock J. (1983). The evolution of insect mating systems. â Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
-
Trivers R.L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. â In: Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871â1971 ( Campbell B., ed.). Heinemann, London, p. 136-179.
-
Trivers R.L. (1985). Social evolution. â Benjamin-Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.
-
Vehrencamp S.L., Bradbury J.W., Gibson R.M. (1989). The energetic cost of display in male sage grouse. â Anim. Behav. 38: 885-896.
-
Wells K.D. (1977). The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. â Anim. Behav. 25: 666-693.
-
Williams G.C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection: a critique of some current evolutionary thought. â Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
-
Zahavi A. (1975). Mate selection â a selection for a handicap. â J. Theor. Biol. 53: 205-214.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 833 | 147 | 13 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 284 | 16 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 118 | 31 | 0 |
Insights to the mating strategies of Habronattus americanus jumping spiders from natural behaviour and staged interactions in the wild
äºBehaviourSearch for other papers by Gwylim S. Blackburn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
bDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, 3529-6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4
Search for other papers by Wayne P. Maddison in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
We documented natural behaviour and staged intersexual interactions of Habronattus americanus jumping spiders in the wild in order to clarify three aspects of their mating strategies: (1)Â Do males invest more than females in locomotory mate search? (2)Â Do females exert strong mate choice? (3)Â Do direct contests occur among males? Males apparently invested heavily in mate search, travelling more than females yet eating nothing. Conversely, females frequently hunted and spent 10% of their time feeding. Females encountered one male per hour, likely affording them a high degree of choice among prospective mates. Accordingly, they promoted the termination of each interaction and ultimately rejected nearly all courting males. Maleâmale interactions were brief and did not feature direct antagonism. Our findings suggest that mate competition in H. americanus is characterized by male scramble competition for dispersed females, and that female mate choice may exert strong selection on male sexual display traits.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 833 | 147 | 13 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 284 | 16 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 118 | 31 | 0 |
